Skip to comments.
The Psychology Underlying "Liberalism"
FrontPageMagazine ^
| September 12, 2002
| John J. Ray
Posted on 07/23/2003 12:13:31 PM PDT by sbw123
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
This is long but well worth the read.
1
posted on
07/23/2003 12:13:32 PM PDT
by
sbw123
To: sbw123
read later
To: sbw123
The appeal of Leftism to the average person is simple: The Leftist offers something for nothing. There ya go...
3
posted on
07/23/2003 12:20:39 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
(Anyone can see a forest fire. Skill lies in sniffing the first smoke. ---Robert Heinlein)
To: sbw123
thanks. i'm new to FR as of today, though have been lurking for some time. great article. i'm going to read this in sections, to digest it all!
To: sbw123
read later
5
posted on
07/23/2003 12:25:16 PM PDT
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: sbw123
6
posted on
07/23/2003 12:29:56 PM PDT
by
w_over_w
(80% of house dust is dead skin . . . makes you think about who you invite inside.)
To: second_semi_annual_toast_throw
Welcome to Free Republic! :)
7
posted on
07/23/2003 12:30:14 PM PDT
by
Fraulein
To: sbw123
Leftists simply reject what does not suit them regardless of the enormous evidence that shows how wrong and dangerously stupid they are.
8
posted on
07/23/2003 12:31:11 PM PDT
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
Bump for later.
9
posted on
07/23/2003 12:34:04 PM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(Make South Korea an island)
To: sbw123
The Psychology Underlying "Liberalism" Interesting timing in contrast to this article.
UC BERKELEY STUDY - Researchers help define what makes a political conservative
To: sbw123
Modern liberals in the US are mostly just "the useful idiots"; what lies behind the mask, however, is a central cadre of dedicated Neo-Marxists. Here is the opening from an interesting book that puts the lie to the "peaceful" nature of these so-called "peace-loving liberals":
"The problems connected with the creation of the armed forces of the revolution are of immense importance for the Communist Parties of all countries. Disregard of these problems, or, even worse, a negative attitude towards them, hidden behind humanitarian pacifist phraseology, is really criminal.
Arguments to the effect that all violence, including revolutionary violence, is evil and that Communists therefore ought not to engage in glorification of armed struggle and the revolutionary army, amount to a philosophy worthy of Quakers, Dukhobors [A Russian Christian sect who refused to perform military service. To escape persecution many emigrated to Canada at the end of the nineteenth century] and the old maids of the Salvation Army.
Permitting such propaganda in a Communist Party is like permitting Tolstoyan propaganda in the garrison of a besieged fortress. He who desires the end must desire the means. The means for emancipating the working people is revolutionary violence. From the moment of the conquest of power, revolutionary violence takes the form of an organized army. The heroism of the young worker who dies on the first barricade of the revolution when this is beginning differs in no way from the heroism of the Red soldier who dies on one of the fronts of the revolution after state power has been taken.
Only sentimental fools can suppose that the proletariat of the capitalist countries is in danger of exaggerating the role of revolutionary violence and showing excessive admiration for the methods of revolutionary terrorism. On the contrary, what the proletariat lacks is, precisely, under-standing of the liberatory role of revolutionary violence. That is the very reason why the proletariat still remains in slavery. Pacifist propaganda among the workers leads only to weakening the will of the proletariat, and helps counter-revolutionary violence, armed to the teeth, to continue."
-Leon Trotsky, 1918.
11
posted on
07/23/2003 12:38:41 PM PDT
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: sbw123
i do not like his agnosticism but realize he is right about the dangers in religious tyranny.I found it an interesting read.
12
posted on
07/23/2003 12:39:14 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: sbw123
Good article, thanks for posting it.
In any event, liberalism truly is a chronic mental/emotional illness.
13
posted on
07/23/2003 12:40:46 PM PDT
by
.577 Tyrannosaur
(In fuda foeda mors est; in victoria, glorosia. -Cicero-)
To: Noumenon
Good point. Also I think an often overlooked feature of leftist political thought is that we all (or most of us) grew up in a planned economy, one might say a commune. It's called "the family". The family is definitely an example where it's pretty much from each according to his ability and to each according to their needs.
I think the left basically never outgrow the economic view of the world that they had as children. They think that the benevolent father (i.e. the state) should provide for the dependent children (i.e. them). They never quite figure out that a state is different than a family. Put another way, they don't grow up.
Liberalism can be thought of as largely a case of arrested development.
To: sbw123
Read soon bump
15
posted on
07/23/2003 12:44:03 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: sbw123; Grampa Dave; glock rocks; Mo1; Fiddlstix; RottiBiz; Brad's Gramma
Bump & Ping - read later...
16
posted on
07/23/2003 12:44:28 PM PDT
by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
To: Noumenon
Philosophical Discourses ...
http://sincronia.cucsh.udg.mx/modr.htm The very concept of postmodernism is defined by Lyotard (1984, 55) as incredulous towards metanarratives and asks where after the metanarratives can legitimacy reside. For Lyotard (1984) what Habermas is offering one more metanarrative of communicative action which is a generalist and abstractual narrative of emancipation. Lyotard (1984) is against the language games of metaphysics and philosophy of science. Lyotard (1984) calls for an irreducible plurality of language games each with its own local rules, legitimations and practices.
Postmodernism offers to move beyond Habermas modernist narratives and is rapidly gaining currency throughout social and human science disciplines way into the 21st century (Powell, 2001). There are several themes that are shared in postmodern analysis, which consolidate Lyotards (1984) interpretation.
First, there is distrust in the concept of absolute and objective truth. Truth is viewed as contextual, situational, and conditional (Biggs and Powell, 2001).
Second, emphasis is placed on fragmentation rather than universalism, again pushing away from the general and encompassing toward the particular (Powell, 2001).
Third, local power is preferred over the centralized power of the nation state, and the decentralization, or the process of democratization of power, is a pervasive theme of postmodern narratives (Mestrovic, 1994).
Fourth, reality is simulated but is otherwise not a very meaningful concept; reality conceived as a general and universal truth is profoundly doubted (Foucault, 1977).
Fifth, we are seeing the rise and consolidation of consumer culture that tends to put power in the hands of the consumers, but can also equally manipulate consumers through marketing ploys and interpolating discourses of consumer freedom by dictating costs in global market place (Biggs and Powell, 2001). Finally, diversity and difference is emphasized and valued above commonality based on homogeneity (Powell, 2001).
Postmodern analysis of culture is no longer a fringe perspective as it promotes strategies of individualism and diversity; and it is critical of strategies that devalue individuals because of any characteristic that control access to knowledge, and that assault identity (Biggs and Powell, 2001). It sees ethics as situational.
17
posted on
07/23/2003 12:53:00 PM PDT
by
Helms
(GWB is Lance Arm-strong-ing the Euros.)
To: sbw123
Soon to finish reading later BBBT
18
posted on
07/23/2003 1:00:52 PM PDT
by
kAcknor
To: Gabrielle Reilly
read later.
To: second_semi_annual_toast_throw
Welcome to the fray.
20
posted on
07/23/2003 1:08:43 PM PDT
by
Lee'sGhost
(Crom!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson