Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brownie
Well, while I agree that the sword of Islamdid a lot of damage (as evidenced by my tag line), they didn't carry out mass genocides -- they never had the strength to do so, they just subsumed the culture. Pockets of the original culture still hung on - witness the Copts and the assyrian Christians.

The American Indian heritage claimed is land, not artifacts. The artifacts can be moved to the country of origin, handed over to the descendents. Land is a more difficult proposition to which there is no easy answer, if there is one at all
125 posted on 07/22/2003 12:37:10 AM PDT by Cronos (Mixing Islam with sanity results in serious side effects. Consult your Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
American Indians ARE claiming things which aren't theirs and styming anthropological research to boot. Then, there are the tribes demanding ( and often getting ) old Indian artifacts, from museums and burying them/sticking them away, where no one can study them or even appreciate them. It's a dog in the manger attitude and does no one any good at all.

The " sword of Islam " did, indeed, carry on genocide. Again, facts and history matter; learn some...please.

129 posted on 07/22/2003 1:13:18 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson