Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Voss; Diddle E. Squat; Night Hides Not; AmericanInTokyo
True, it'll be a major bummer for media coverage of the Iraq scandal that isn't, much like the DC sniper coverage spoiled most of the Democrats' attempts to blame Bush for the economy before the November 2002 election. But I really, really, REALLY don't want to have to turn on the TV and see nothing but 24/7 tabloidism when, as AIT has pointed out, North Korea can probably reduce the good city of Los Angeles to radioactive ruins.
127 posted on 07/18/2003 2:33:45 PM PDT by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Angelus Errare
Yes, Angelus, but your choice is much like that faced by third party people, who want their candidate and resent the two main party choices.

We don't get to choose coverage of the war on terror and most particularly North Korea.

Our choice is uraniumgate or the Kobe case. I vote for Kobe, because although I am not particularly interested in it, at least it has nothing to do with President Bush and evil Republicans.

Although the way things are going lately, that nice young district attorney in Vail is probably the county chairman for Bush/Cheney 2004.

143 posted on 07/18/2003 2:37:35 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson