Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THAT URANIUM STORY
NRO ^ | 7/14/2003 | David Frum

Posted on 07/14/2003 8:59:22 PM PDT by Utah Girl

On the ground floor of the White House is the Map Room, so-called because it was here that Franklin Roosevelt used to get his briefings on the progress of World War II. Over the mantel is the last map FDR saw before his death. It shows American, British, and Soviet troops racing toward Berlin. It also shows a frightening concentration of German forces in the Nazis’ last redoubt, the mountains of Bavaria.

We now know of course that this last redoubt did not exist. American intelligence had been deceived. And it’s possible that policymakers also deceived themselves. Roosevelt, for reasons of his own, wanted to let the Russians have the honor – and suffer the losses – of an assault on Berlin. The belief in the last redoubt was a very useful belief: It justified FDR’s wish to avoid joining the battle for Berlin.

Intelligence is a very uncertain business. And there’s no doubt that consumers of intelligence tend to be quicker to accept uncertain information that confirms their prejudices than uncertain information that calls those prejudices into question. Since consumers of intelligence are usually prejudiced in favor of doing little, most of the time they prefer intelligence that errs on the side of minimizing dangers.

9/11 changed the way American officials looked at the world. So when they got reports that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium in Niger, you can understand why they took the information seriously. That information has since turned out to be false – and its falsity has generated a major political controversy, as bitter-end opponents of this president and the war on terror try to exploit the administration’s error.

The controversy turns on the fact that some in the CIA doubted the story from the start. Their warnings were apparently disregarded, that is assuming that they were adequately communicated in the first place. Why? One reason may be that the CIA’s warnings on Iraq matters had lost some of their credibility in the 1990s. The agency was regarded by many in the Bush administration as reflexively and implacably hostile to any activist policy in Iraq. Those skeptics had come to believe that the agency was slanting its information on Iraq in order to maneuver the administration into supporting the agency’s own soft-line policies.

So when the Bush administration got skeptical news on the Niger uranium matter, it would not be surprising if mid-level policymakers mentally filed it under the heading “more of the same from the CIA,” filed it, and discounted it. The tendency was redoubled by the origin of the Niger-debunking report: Joseph C. Wilson. For more about him, see Clifford May's important post in last week's NRO. The result was the strange formulation in the State of the Union speech, in which the Niger story was cited – but attributed to British intelligence.

The story is an embarrassment for all concerned. But it no more undercuts the case for the Iraq war than FDR’s mistake in 1945 retroactively discredited the case for World War II. The United States did not overthrow Saddam Hussein because he was buying uranium in Niger. It overthrow him because he was a threat to the United States, to his neighbors, to his own people, and to the peace of a crucial region of the globe. All of that is just as true as it was on the day the President delivered his speech containing the errant 16 words – and the war is just as right and justified today as it was then.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: britsstandbystory; cia; davidfrum; frostedyellowcake; intelligence; josephwilson; mycousinknowsclay; niger; opus; sotu; uranium; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780781-790 next last
To: A Navy Vet; OWK; unsycophant; SunnyUsa
Just thought I'd jump into the fray...for old times sake.

Me too!

There are too many posts on this thread for me to follow. But it's nice to be back, all be it as a bizarre American experiment!!!

761 posted on 07/17/2003 3:08:53 PM PDT by jjbrouwer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
all be it as a bizarre American experiment!!!

I heard this might happen. Just don't undo the bolts, or your head will fall off. CS too.

762 posted on 07/17/2003 6:24:49 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant
CS has had a screw loose for some time so I cannot speak for him...
763 posted on 07/17/2003 6:26:51 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Sometimes they come back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
First time I've seen "loose" used correctly.

Yep, I have an appeal for the surreal...
764 posted on 07/17/2003 6:31:17 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Yeah, its that guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Hey, you are following me. Stalker!!!
765 posted on 07/17/2003 6:36:40 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Sometimes they come back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
Guess who noticed us already?

Too funny!

gotta go
766 posted on 07/17/2003 6:40:35 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Yeah, its that guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 765 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
This article makes too much sense. The liberals will never believe it.

And just who gave you permission to comment on the article this late in the thread?

;^)

767 posted on 07/17/2003 6:45:03 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Hey, Scroots - they can post here too, you know. They don't because they apparently have that "integrity" thing. Or they've forgotten their passwords!
768 posted on 07/17/2003 6:49:08 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Sometimes they come back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
The "skulked back" part was hilarious! But Nicky always aims to make folks laugh, unintentionally, but hey, a laugh is a laugh.

And I don't take anything seriously anymore, not worth it...
769 posted on 07/17/2003 7:57:52 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Yeah, its that guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 768 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant; Central Scrutiniser; jjbrouwer
Good to see some 'new' faces..

Has there been a general amnesty, or have only a few selected sycophantics been paroled?
770 posted on 07/17/2003 8:01:50 PM PDT by tpaine (Really, I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but principles keep getting in me way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Has there been a general amnesty, or have only a few selected sycophantics been paroled?

Probably the latter, I am afraid. CS and I are well-known boot-lickers who are always preaching the FR gospel.

771 posted on 07/17/2003 8:04:17 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Sometimes they come back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Hey man! My last freepmail that I never got to read was from you.

Just enjoying myself and having some fun catching up with old friends. Just a note that my account was open, pure suprise. Oh well...
772 posted on 07/17/2003 8:11:20 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Yeah, its that guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
I fear you are behind the curve on bootlicking..

Bare feet are in fashion for the summer. Toes first.
773 posted on 07/17/2003 8:12:47 PM PDT by tpaine (Really, I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but principles keep getting in me way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 771 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Damn. I didn't get that memo. Hopefully, smelling salts will be provided.
774 posted on 07/17/2003 8:17:03 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Sometimes they come back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 773 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
Bad Joe may have them in stock. Ask for Bin #10.
775 posted on 07/17/2003 8:24:51 PM PDT by tpaine (Really, I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but principles keep getting in me way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Cool. Do I get a chair too...?
776 posted on 07/17/2003 8:33:47 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Sometimes they come back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 775 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
Chair? No kneed. This is not a sit down job.
You have to grovel like the rest of us.
777 posted on 07/17/2003 8:42:26 PM PDT by tpaine (Really, I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but principles keep getting in me way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
Chair? No kneed. This is not a sit down job.
You have to grovel like the rest of us.
778 posted on 07/17/2003 8:42:27 PM PDT by tpaine (Really, I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but principles keep getting in me way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 776 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
I heard you the first time - but thanks for the advice.
779 posted on 07/17/2003 8:46:21 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Sometimes they come back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer; Central Scrutiniser; SeaDragon
"But it's nice to be back. . ."

Well, my oh my, look at what the cats brought in! Welcome back, you two.

Hey, Sea, jj is back!

780 posted on 07/17/2003 10:06:55 PM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780781-790 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson