At some point, they will begin to ignore it -- as if it isn't happening. Judith Miller and Matt Cooper could be sent off to the big house...and all it will earn them is a column inch of agate type on page C-18.
From a CNN interview
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0502/20/rs.01.html
COOPER: Well, first of all, it's not entirely -- I -- without saying, disclosing, what everyone wants to know, I wouldn't be entirely certain about, you know, the motivation of the leakers, who leaked what, when, where, how.
But that said, look, journalism needs to be able to protect its sources in order to be able to function. It's the only way to ferret out information. And we need to be able to do that.
Now, I will readily concede that at times that may not make the life of a prosecutor easier. But that's not my job in society is to make the life of a prosecutor easier. You know, I gave limited testimony to a prosecutor last year after one of my sources absolved me of our promise of confidentiality, and I was happy to do so, and would do it again.
KURTZ: An aide to Vice President Cheney.
COOPER: I would do it again, right. But this time the prosecutors asked for really, basically, every one of my sources and my notebook. That's much harder to comply with.
The case says less about miller:
Supbpenas "seeking documents and testimony related to conversatins between her and a specified government official "occuring from on or about July 6, 2003 to on or about July 13, 2003,...concerning Valerie Plame Wilson...or concerning Iraqi efforts to obtain uranium."
Presumably that person isn't Libby since long before he released the reporters. Who could it be...and just how did she get involved in this matter...she apparently wrote nothing about Plame