Posted on 07/12/2003 1:50:35 PM PDT by yonif
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi told a conference of African leaders Saturday that Africans who are "straight" need not fear AIDS, which is ravaging many countries on the continent.
Speaking through a translator, Gadhafi drew some laughter with his reference to AIDS only affected homosexuals.
He told the closing session of the eight-day annual African Union conference, "All you have to do is observe the rules. If you are straight, you have nothing to fear from AIDS." He also described HIV, the virus that causes AIDS as "a peaceful virus, not an aggressive virus."
Of the 42 million people worldwide infected with HIV, 29 million live in sub-Saharan Africa. , at the close of the eight-day summit,
Gadhafi added in his address to 40 African heads of state that they should also not "worry about tsetse flies and mosquitoes" - which carry malaria and sleeping sickness - saying they were "God's armies" protecting Africa from its enemies, apparently foreigners.
"If they come here, they will get malaria and sleeping sickness," he said.
Malaria kills 5 million Africans a year, while sleeping sickness - also known as African trypanosomiasis - kills more than 25,000 people in Africa a year.
Wrong. I have proven my point ad nauseum on this thread and will not do so again for you. Read the studies I have posted and please learn from them.
Trace
Of course it is very different. In Africa they do not have money for expensive testing to verify diagnosis, but they get more money from West if they diagnose tuberculosis, malnutrition or pneumonia as AIDS.
PLEASE READ THIS FOLKS... Don't listen to me or these morons..read and make up your own mind!
http://www.aegis.com/pubs/bala/2000/BA001003.html
Is the Rate of New HIV Infections Rising?: The San Francisco Controversy and Its Lessons for Los Angeles and the USBeing Alive - October, 2000
Walt Senterfitt--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The gay press in California and around the country have spent a lot of ink debating some numbers released just before the Durban International AIDS Conference and an accompanying speculation by San Francisco's chief HIV epidemiologist that "rates of new HIV infections in some parts of San Francisco's gay population have increased to sub-Saharan levels." This news was greeted with loud echoes of everything from "Can't be! It's the health department cooking numbers in a plot to justify more restrictions on gay sex," to "The AIDS crisis is over! This is another detraction from the health needs of the large number of HIV negative gay men and lesbians," to "It's highly suspect! Bogus! A San Francisco plot to keep their unfair share of federal AIDS funding," to "We are not surprised, given the lessening fear of HIV with the advent of HAART and the barebacking craze."
Each of these and most other reactions is at best one-tenth true, but the controversy has been valuable. Its context is the hard-to-dispute fact that HIV prevention has not kept pace with the changes in the epidemic.
What Are the Facts In San Francisco?
It is important to remember that there is no way to count new HIV infections and therefore no way to prove beyond a doubt whether rates of infection are increasing, decreasing or level. New HIV infections are not yet reportable to public health departments in California and even if they were, there is usually no way to tell if a positive test is a new infection or an old one in someone who has not been tested or reported before. Most of all, there is no way of knowing how many new infections occur anew or exist already among people who haven't been tested at all. Thus, the best we can do, and we are getting better at it, is to estimate based on several different kinds of data. The estimates will always be approximate at best, but if we use the same or better methods every year, we can get a pretty good picture of the trends.San Francisco is better than anywhere else in the US at estimating infections (some might say, aided by all that money, its small size and the high visibility of the gay community). There are more studies and surveillance systems to base estimates on and more experts to analyze them. The San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) periodically convenes a panel of these experts and a group of community people living with or working with HIV on the front lines, to develop for planning purposes consensus estimates of people living with HIV/AIDS and the annual rate of new infections. The latest such consensus panel met in May 2000.
One new tool to help determine HIV incidence is what's called the "detuned Elisa assay." This takes advantage of the improvement in HIV testing over the years, the improvement that has shrunk the so-called window period (when one might be HIV+ but not yet show up it on an antibody test) from six months to six weeks. The detuned assay tests a person's blood with both the old, less sensitive test and the new, more sensitive one. If one is negative on the old test and positive on the new one, we can conclude that person is within the old "window period" of a new infection. By doing this double test on thousands of specimens, the CDC has concluded that someone can be identified with this system as being within the first four months of infection. So in a high volume testing center, STD clinic or medical care system, one can estimate how many infections are new. By combining these data with other information about the population that uses the testing system, one can estimate the percentage of negative people in the population who are seroconverting each year.
The San Francisco consensus panel estimated that the proportion of gay and bisexual men becoming HIV infected rose from 1.1% a year in 1997 (the time of the last consensus panel) to 1.7% a year in 2000. Among the much smaller number of gay and bisexual men who are also injection drugs users (IDUs) the rate and the increase were much greater: from 2.0% seroconverting every year in 1997 to 4.6% a year in 2000. Among heterosexual IDUs the rate declined somewhat from 1.0% a year in 1997 to 0.6 % a year in 2000. Among non-IDU heterosexuals, the estimates are tiny and stable: 1/100th of a percent per year in both years.
These estimates from HIV testing sites were bolstered by findings from other sources. There is increased incidence of HIV in a cohort study of young gay men, increased cases of rectal gonorrhea, increased frequency of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among gay men living with AIDS, increased total numbers of people with AIDS and HIV (of whom a big chunk are sexually active), increased self-reports of multiple partners and unprotected anal sex among gay and bi men, increased self-reports of unprotected anal sex among partners of different or unknown HIV status, and decreased consistent condom use overall.
The increase in estimated rates translated to increases in estimated numbers, especially when the rates were applied to upwardly revised estimates of the total number of gay and bi men in San Francisco, derived from studies with stronger methods. The panel estimated that there will be 573 new infections in gay men in 2000 compared to 283 in 1997; 143 in gay/bi IDUs, up from 53 in 1997; and declines in heterosexual IDUs from 117 to 68 and in non-IDU heterosexuals from 45 to 6.
Though some writers in the San Francisco gay press and some community leaders have quibbled with this or that component of the estimates, no one has introduced credible evidence or argument that the basic trend depicted is false. Readers may find a complete presentation of the data as well as the recommendations below on the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) HIV Web Site: http://HIVinsite.ucsf.edu/ari/HIVEstimatesReport8900.html
Why Are Infections Increasing? What's Going On?
A community panel examining the estimates remarked that while the numbers have evinced alarm, sadness and a great deal of anger, almost no one was surprised. The increase is based in their view on several realities.For one thing, and this has been confirmed in studies in West Hollywood and Los Angeles, the perception of AIDS as a death sentence is largely gone among gay men, as a result of the partial reality and the widespread hype surrounding highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and the change of HIV/AIDS to a "chronic, manageable disease." When AIDS were still seen as a death sentence, and people had seen hundreds of their community waste away and die, people made certain choices about risk that became less common when that perception changed. It is not only HAART, but new generations coming of age without the visible swaths of the scythe of the Grim Reaper.
The perception of HIV on the streets has changed, and most HIV efforts have not caught up with that change. Studies indicate that high-risk sexual behavior is on the rise in San Francisco (and most likely in WeHo, Long Beach and LA).
The San Francisco community analysts divided gay men's communities into three distinct groups, all with real but different prevention needs. The first group comprises people who have eliminated high-risk behavior from their lives (whether they are HIV positive or negative). They have a thorough knowledge of HIV transmission and risk reduction techniques, and have chosen to eliminate risk based on personal decisions about their risk and need.
A second group has engaged in high-risk behavior throughout the epidemic, despite years of exposure to risk reduction in media and community prevention efforts. This has not changed. For these men, "decisions about perceived risk are outweighed by their needs for identity, intimacy, pleasure or other considerations. They know about risk, have made choices, and engage in behavior at the level of risk they believe to be appropriate."
A third group of gay and bi men has changed its behavior recently. "This group makes situational decisions about risk behavior. These decisions are based on their knowledge and understanding of HIV transmission, the perceived risk of the behavior in question, and the stated or presumed HIV status of their partners."
The Gist of What's Wrong with Prevention
HIV prevention and education have been based on many theories for the past 20 years. Most of these theories have assumed that reasoning things out can lead to safer behavior. While that is certainly partly true, reason isn't the only thing that guides our behavior in the heat of the moment. Most gay men make decisions on sex at a level far more basic and urgent than one naturally including complex reasoning analysis. The San Franciscans noted, "A brochure can be informative on Tuesday morning; in a moment of passion on Friday night, a different analysis occurs." (Do I hear you say "duh"?)Substance use before and during sex is also a factor. For some individuals, chronic loneliness, isolation and alienation may lead to remedies that include high-risk behavior. So can pursuit of pleasure in a society where discrimination can make life painful.
Finally, prevention has until now largely excluded the needs of HIV+ people. Nearly every positive person wished HIV to stop with him or her, but there has been precious little support for doing that, in the context of a sex-and intimacy-positive full, rounded life.
In a nutshell, the realities of new HIV infections are complex, and prevention needs to change. (I acknowledge that I am limiting this analysis largely to gay and bisexual men who overwhelmingly predominate in the epidemic on the West Coast. There are different but analogous stories to be told about women, hetero-and bisexual communities of color, IDUs and different regions of the country.)
What Is To Be Done?
The San Francisco DPH and its community planning bodies have issued an "11 Point Action Plan" as an opening salvo in a dynamic process of "dialogue, programmatic renovation and community norm building among gay men." The plan is not deemed either exhaustive or complete, but a foundation of assumptions being made to begin to both revitalize HIV prevention in San Francisco and to revitalize the San Francisco gay community's ownership of its own longevity.I present these points here in their original form. I believe that they are worthy of intensive discussion in Los Angeles and elsewhere around the nation.
A Call to Action
New HIV infections are going up among gay men in San Francisco.
San Francisco needs a new prevention model -- one which recognizes the impact that successful HIV therapies have had on the gay community.
The gay community needs to take the lead in developing a community response.
Are you a homosexual?
Only in your wettest dream.
Trace
I think that you are.
You are sick!
AIDS: The Agony of Africa |
Part Five: Death and the Second Sex Harare, Zimbabwe and Nigeri Village, Kenya -- Sipewe Mhakeni used herbs from the Mugugudhu tree. After grinding the stem and leaf, she would mix just a pinch of the sand-colored powder with water, wrap it in a bit of nylon stocking, and insert it into her vagina for 10 to 15 minutes. The herbs swell the soft tissues of the vagina, make it hot, and dry it out. That made sex "very painful," says Mhakeni. But, she adds, "Our African husbands enjoy sex with a dry vagina." By Mark Schoofs
|
This article was originally published in the Village Voice.
More articles by Mark Schoofs.
See #65, there are more, readily accessible via any internet search engine.
Trace
First there is nothing "gay" about homosexuals. Second it is time that you come out of the closet. ZOT?
I don't need to ask my doctor. I can see the number at the CDC on the web. AIDS is NOT running rampent in the hetro community.
I would hate to see you come down with the disease just because of plain old ignorance.
Your concern for me is touching Trace.
I won't get AIDS. I'm not a fairy and I don't shoot needles. Aside from some innocent children and blood transfusion patients most AIDS carriers are homosexual, drug users, or the sexual partners of drug users or bisexual men. If it was not so we would see lots of women with AIDS in America. The numbers don't support your arguments.
Plus all he can steal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.