Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gadhafi: 'Straights' Don't Get AIDS
The Tuscaloosa News ^ | July 12, 2003 | ELLIOTT SYLVESTER - AP

Posted on 07/12/2003 1:50:35 PM PDT by yonif

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi told a conference of African leaders Saturday that Africans who are "straight" need not fear AIDS, which is ravaging many countries on the continent.

Speaking through a translator, Gadhafi drew some laughter with his reference to AIDS only affected homosexuals.

He told the closing session of the eight-day annual African Union conference, "All you have to do is observe the rules. If you are straight, you have nothing to fear from AIDS." He also described HIV, the virus that causes AIDS as "a peaceful virus, not an aggressive virus."

Of the 42 million people worldwide infected with HIV, 29 million live in sub-Saharan Africa. , at the close of the eight-day summit,

Gadhafi added in his address to 40 African heads of state that they should also not "worry about tsetse flies and mosquitoes" - which carry malaria and sleeping sickness - saying they were "God's armies" protecting Africa from its enemies, apparently foreigners.

"If they come here, they will get malaria and sleeping sickness," he said.

Malaria kills 5 million Africans a year, while sleeping sickness - also known as African trypanosomiasis - kills more than 25,000 people in Africa a year.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; evil; gadhafi; homosexuals; libya; qadaffi; terrorist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-230 next last
To: chasio649
whacky site huh? ;)
81 posted on 07/12/2003 7:19:48 PM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
This is strange - what is the connection between recognition of the fact that true AIDS affects male homosexuals much more than others and between hating them? Your logic is lacking.

Wrong. I have proven my point ad nauseum on this thread and will not do so again for you. Read the studies I have posted and please learn from them.

Trace

82 posted on 07/12/2003 7:20:36 PM PDT by Trace21230 (Ideal MOAB test site: Paris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink
I know the AIDS dynamic is much different in Africa

Of course it is very different. In Africa they do not have money for expensive testing to verify diagnosis, but they get more money from West if they diagnose tuberculosis, malnutrition or pneumonia as AIDS.

83 posted on 07/12/2003 7:20:54 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
MORE....... this is startling and irrefutable evidence that this myth is fading among public the more the screams of HOMOPHOBIA is claimed.. There are more folks like the few on the thread that are beginning to speak up and stand up!!!

PLEASE READ THIS FOLKS... Don't listen to me or these morons..read and make up your own mind!

 
Is the Rate of New HIV Infections Rising?: The San Francisco Controversy and Its Lessons for Los Angeles and the US

Being Alive - October, 2000
Walt Senterfitt

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The gay press in California and around the country have spent a lot of ink debating some numbers released just before the Durban International AIDS Conference and an accompanying speculation by San Francisco's chief HIV epidemiologist that "rates of new HIV infections in some parts of San Francisco's gay population have increased to sub-Saharan levels." This news was greeted with loud echoes of everything from "Can't be! It's the health department cooking numbers in a plot to justify more restrictions on gay sex," to "The AIDS crisis is over! This is another detraction from the health needs of the large number of HIV negative gay men and lesbians," to "It's highly suspect! Bogus! A San Francisco plot to keep their unfair share of federal AIDS funding," to "We are not surprised, given the lessening fear of HIV with the advent of HAART and the barebacking craze."

Each of these and most other reactions is at best one-tenth true, but the controversy has been valuable. Its context is the hard-to-dispute fact that HIV prevention has not kept pace with the changes in the epidemic.

What Are the Facts In San Francisco?
It is important to remember that there is no way to count new HIV infections and therefore no way to prove beyond a doubt whether rates of infection are increasing, decreasing or level. New HIV infections are not yet reportable to public health departments in California and even if they were, there is usually no way to tell if a positive test is a new infection or an old one in someone who has not been tested or reported before. Most of all, there is no way of knowing how many new infections occur anew or exist already among people who haven't been tested at all. Thus, the best we can do, and we are getting better at it, is to estimate based on several different kinds of data. The estimates will always be approximate at best, but if we use the same or better methods every year, we can get a pretty good picture of the trends.

San Francisco is better than anywhere else in the US at estimating infections (some might say, aided by all that money, its small size and the high visibility of the gay community). There are more studies and surveillance systems to base estimates on and more experts to analyze them. The San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) periodically convenes a panel of these experts and a group of community people living with or working with HIV on the front lines, to develop for planning purposes consensus estimates of people living with HIV/AIDS and the annual rate of new infections. The latest such consensus panel met in May 2000.

One new tool to help determine HIV incidence is what's called the "detuned Elisa assay." This takes advantage of the improvement in HIV testing over the years, the improvement that has shrunk the so-called window period (when one might be HIV+ but not yet show up it on an antibody test) from six months to six weeks. The detuned assay tests a person's blood with both the old, less sensitive test and the new, more sensitive one. If one is negative on the old test and positive on the new one, we can conclude that person is within the old "window period" of a new infection. By doing this double test on thousands of specimens, the CDC has concluded that someone can be identified with this system as being within the first four months of infection. So in a high volume testing center, STD clinic or medical care system, one can estimate how many infections are new. By combining these data with other information about the population that uses the testing system, one can estimate the percentage of negative people in the population who are seroconverting each year.

The San Francisco consensus panel estimated that the proportion of gay and bisexual men becoming HIV infected rose from 1.1% a year in 1997 (the time of the last consensus panel) to 1.7% a year in 2000. Among the much smaller number of gay and bisexual men who are also injection drugs users (IDUs) the rate and the increase were much greater: from 2.0% seroconverting every year in 1997 to 4.6% a year in 2000. Among heterosexual IDUs the rate declined somewhat from 1.0% a year in 1997 to 0.6 % a year in 2000. Among non-IDU heterosexuals, the estimates are tiny and stable: 1/100th of a percent per year in both years.

These estimates from HIV testing sites were bolstered by findings from other sources. There is increased incidence of HIV in a cohort study of young gay men, increased cases of rectal gonorrhea, increased frequency of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among gay men living with AIDS, increased total numbers of people with AIDS and HIV (of whom a big chunk are sexually active), increased self-reports of multiple partners and unprotected anal sex among gay and bi men, increased self-reports of unprotected anal sex among partners of different or unknown HIV status, and decreased consistent condom use overall.

The increase in estimated rates translated to increases in estimated numbers, especially when the rates were applied to upwardly revised estimates of the total number of gay and bi men in San Francisco, derived from studies with stronger methods. The panel estimated that there will be 573 new infections in gay men in 2000 compared to 283 in 1997; 143 in gay/bi IDUs, up from 53 in 1997; and declines in heterosexual IDUs from 117 to 68 and in non-IDU heterosexuals from 45 to 6.

Though some writers in the San Francisco gay press and some community leaders have quibbled with this or that component of the estimates, no one has introduced credible evidence or argument that the basic trend depicted is false. Readers may find a complete presentation of the data as well as the recommendations below on the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) HIV Web Site: http://HIVinsite.ucsf.edu/ari/HIVEstimatesReport8900.html

Why Are Infections Increasing? What's Going On?
A community panel examining the estimates remarked that while the numbers have evinced alarm, sadness and a great deal of anger, almost no one was surprised. The increase is based in their view on several realities.

For one thing, and this has been confirmed in studies in West Hollywood and Los Angeles, the perception of AIDS as a death sentence is largely gone among gay men, as a result of the partial reality and the widespread hype surrounding highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and the change of HIV/AIDS to a "chronic, manageable disease." When AIDS were still seen as a death sentence, and people had seen hundreds of their community waste away and die, people made certain choices about risk that became less common when that perception changed. It is not only HAART, but new generations coming of age without the visible swaths of the scythe of the Grim Reaper.

The perception of HIV on the streets has changed, and most HIV efforts have not caught up with that change. Studies indicate that high-risk sexual behavior is on the rise in San Francisco (and most likely in WeHo, Long Beach and LA).

The San Francisco community analysts divided gay men's communities into three distinct groups, all with real but different prevention needs. The first group comprises people who have eliminated high-risk behavior from their lives (whether they are HIV positive or negative). They have a thorough knowledge of HIV transmission and risk reduction techniques, and have chosen to eliminate risk based on personal decisions about their risk and need.

A second group has engaged in high-risk behavior throughout the epidemic, despite years of exposure to risk reduction in media and community prevention efforts. This has not changed. For these men, "decisions about perceived risk are outweighed by their needs for identity, intimacy, pleasure or other considerations. They know about risk, have made choices, and engage in behavior at the level of risk they believe to be appropriate."

A third group of gay and bi men has changed its behavior recently. "This group makes situational decisions about risk behavior. These decisions are based on their knowledge and understanding of HIV transmission, the perceived risk of the behavior in question, and the stated or presumed HIV status of their partners."

The Gist of What's Wrong with Prevention
HIV prevention and education have been based on many theories for the past 20 years. Most of these theories have assumed that reasoning things out can lead to safer behavior. While that is certainly partly true, reason isn't the only thing that guides our behavior in the heat of the moment. Most gay men make decisions on sex at a level far more basic and urgent than one naturally including complex reasoning analysis. The San Franciscans noted, "A brochure can be informative on Tuesday morning; in a moment of passion on Friday night, a different analysis occurs." (Do I hear you say "duh"?)

Substance use before and during sex is also a factor. For some individuals, chronic loneliness, isolation and alienation may lead to remedies that include high-risk behavior. So can pursuit of pleasure in a society where discrimination can make life painful.

Finally, prevention has until now largely excluded the needs of HIV+ people. Nearly every positive person wished HIV to stop with him or her, but there has been precious little support for doing that, in the context of a sex-and intimacy-positive full, rounded life.

In a nutshell, the realities of new HIV infections are complex, and prevention needs to change. (I acknowledge that I am limiting this analysis largely to gay and bisexual men who overwhelmingly predominate in the epidemic on the West Coast. There are different but analogous stories to be told about women, hetero-and bisexual communities of color, IDUs and different regions of the country.)

What Is To Be Done?
The San Francisco DPH and its community planning bodies have issued an "11 Point Action Plan" as an opening salvo in a dynamic process of "dialogue, programmatic renovation and community norm building among gay men." The plan is not deemed either exhaustive or complete, but a foundation of assumptions being made to begin to both revitalize HIV prevention in San Francisco and to revitalize the San Francisco gay community's ownership of its own longevity.

I present these points here in their original form. I believe that they are worthy of intensive discussion in Los Angeles and elsewhere around the nation.

A Call to Action
New HIV infections are going up among gay men in San Francisco.
San Francisco needs a new prevention model -- one which recognizes the impact that successful HIV therapies have had on the gay community.
The gay community needs to take the lead in developing a community response.

http://www.aegis.com/pubs/bala/2000/BA001003.html
Check the links yourself!
84 posted on 07/12/2003 7:21:10 PM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Gadhafi is very "light in the loafers". He has the inside straight on who gets AIDS and who doesn't.
85 posted on 07/12/2003 7:22:14 PM PDT by Momma Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
Wrong. I have proven my point ad nauseum on this thread and will not do so again for you.

Are you a homosexual?

86 posted on 07/12/2003 7:23:14 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
You may not read it Trace, but others will and call your BS what it has been.. sorry, the curtain is dropping on your sorry act!
87 posted on 07/12/2003 7:23:49 PM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Are you a homosexual?

Only in your wettest dream.

Trace

88 posted on 07/12/2003 7:24:35 PM PDT by Trace21230 (Ideal MOAB test site: Paris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: sojulovecheeks; FPRA; Luis Gonzalez; Emmylou
Had to ping you to show you this thread.

Unbelievable.

Trace
89 posted on 07/12/2003 7:28:29 PM PDT by Trace21230 (Ideal MOAB test site: Paris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
Are you a homosexual?

Only in your wettest dream.

I think that you are.

90 posted on 07/12/2003 7:28:51 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
Only in your wettest dream.

You are sick!

91 posted on 07/12/2003 7:29:15 PM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
I would like to see your references. I checked CDC statistics this week. Acording to the CDC, a US male heterosexual that doesn't inject drugs is more likely to get breast cancer than AIDS.
92 posted on 07/12/2003 7:29:56 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
San Francisco isn't in AFRICA.. AND you wanted documentation .. UH "these morons" btw seems you are the pot calling the kettle black..

AIDS: The Agony of Africa
Part Five: Death and the Second Sex

By Mark Schoofs
December 1-7, 1999

Harare, Zimbabwe and Nigeri Village, Kenya -- Sipewe Mhakeni used herbs from the Mugugudhu tree. After grinding the stem and leaf, she would mix just a pinch of the sand-colored powder with water, wrap it in a bit of nylon stocking, and insert it into her vagina for 10 to 15 minutes. The herbs swell the soft tissues of the vagina, make it hot, and dry it out. That made sex "very painful," says Mhakeni. But, she adds, "Our African husbands enjoy sex with a dry vagina."

Many women concur that dry sex, as this practice is called, hurts. Yet it is common throughout southern Africa, where the AIDS epidemic is worse than anywhere in the world. Researchers conducting a study in Zimbabwe, where Mhakeni lives, had trouble finding a control group of women who did not engage in some form of the practice. Some women dry out their vaginas with mutendo wegudo -- soil with baboon urine -- that they obtain from traditional healers, while others use detergents, salt, cotton, or shredded newspaper. Research shows that dry sex causes vaginal lacerations and suppresses the vagina's natural bacteria, both of which increase the likelihood of HIV infection. And some AIDS workers believe the extra friction makes condoms tear more easily.

Dry sex is not the only way African women subordinate their sexual safety to men's pleasure. In a few cultures, a woman's vagina is kept tight by sewing it almost shut. But in most African societies, the methods are subtler: Girls are socialized to yield sexual decision-making to men. Prisca Mhlolo is in charge of counseling at The Centre, a large organization for HIV-positive Zimbabweans. "You're not even allowed to say, 'Can we have sex?' " she notes. "So it's very hard to bring up condoms."

Mhlolo speaks from both professional and personal experience. She is HIV-positive, infected by her late husband. As AIDS eroded his immune system, he suffered from herpes, which broke into open sores on his penis. Mhlolo suggested condoms, "but he said, 'Now that I'm sick you have gotten yourself a boyfriend.' It was very hard."

Many people balk at discussing the sexual practices of particular cultures because the issue is too sensitive -- and, in Africa, too racially charged. Whites have caricatured African sexuality for centuries, casting black men as sexual beasts, and some whites still whisper that this is why HIV is running rampant among Africans. But such stereotypes miss the point, which is not the libido itself but the culture in which it finds expression. HIV spread through the American gay community because having anal sex with many partners was common, and the virus infiltrated the Thai army because soldiers routinely patronized prostitutes. In Bombay, where AIDS has exploded, slum lords demand payment in sex. I.V. drug use aside, male sexual privilege is what drives the epidemic.

Studies from many different cultures show that men average more partners than women do and have more sex outside marriage. Because a man ejaculates into a woman, men are more likely to transmit the virus, whereas women are more likely to contract HIV without passing it on. So far, males have outnumbered females in HIV cases, partly because having more partners means more chances to encounter the virus. But new figures show that in sub-Saharan Africa, 55 percent of all infected adults are women.

Of course, Africa contains thousands of cultures, some of which have strict sexual codes. But common to many sub-Saharan societies are the gender roles epitomized by dry sex: Women are unable to negotiate sex, and so must risk infection to please the man. In fact, there are very few female checks and balances on male behavior. This stark inequality "is part of our culture," Mhlolo says, "and our culture is part of why HIV is spreading."

Africa today is far removed from its traditional, tightly knit communities that did constrain men, mostly to their wives. Africa is also very different from the West, where women exercise a relatively large degree of power. Many parts of contemporary Africa are suspended in a limbo that combines the worst of both worlds, and HIV has exploited this. For example, men retain the mindset of polygamy, but now have many partners through commercial sex or "sugar daddy" relationships that lack the social cohesion of traditional marriages.

But AIDS is forcing African culture to change -- and because the virus in Africa is spread mainly through heterosexual sex, the epidemic's largest social transformation may well be in the relations between women and men. Women could emerge from the epidemic with more power, and there is a strong push to make that happen. But there is also a backlash, a call to reimpose restrictions on women in the name of strengthening traditional African cultures and curtailing AIDS.

The battles are being fought not only over sexual practices, but also over larger economic and social forces that subordinate women and facilitate the spread of HIV. The World Bank reports that illiteracy rates among women south of the Sahara are almost 50 percent higher than among men. Many African girls cannot attend school because they are assigned time-consuming chores such as fetching water and firewood. Indeed, African women work longer than men -- and harder. Studies from Ghana and Tanzania show that rural women transport four times as much as men, often carrying the loads on their head, and other studies show that women do up to 90 percent of hoeing and weeding. Yet they make far less money than men and rarely own property. In Cameroon, for example, fewer than 10 percent of all land certificates belong to women.

African women also lack authority. Just this year, Zimbabwe's Supreme Court ruled that women have no more status or rights in the family than a "junior male" -- usually an adolescent. If a wife wants to take a trip, explains Thoko Matshe, director of the Women's Resource Center in the capital Harare, "she has to sit her husband down, get the guy in a good mood, and ask him if she can go. If you cannot negotiate that, you cannot negotiate sex."

In most sub-Saharan traditional cultures, men pay for their wives, which gives them license to dominate the relationship. The very concept of marital rape doesn't exist in most of Africa, and even the aunties -- traditional marriage counselors for many young African wives -- tell women that they cannot refuse sex with their husbands. Thoko Ngwenya of Zimbabwe's Musasa Project, which fights domestic violence, explains the mindset: "Once a man has paid lobola" -- the word for dowry in several southern African languages -- "they are not forcing their wife to have sex. It's just their right."

The sexual subservience of women is inculcated long before adulthood. For example, traditional Shona girls are taught to pull the lips of their labia to lengthen them so that men can play with them during foreplay, yet women are not supposed to touch their husband's penis. Indeed, in some cultures, female circumcision removes the most sexually sensitive part of a woman's body -- her clitoris. "For women," says Caroline Maposhere of Zimbabwe's Women and AIDS Support Network, "there is no sexuality, only fertility."

Ironically, the prohibition against wives participating fully and actively in sex can itself promote the spread of the virus. Eliot Ma-gunje runs counseling groups for men at The Centre. He hears men complain that their wives' passivity "destroys the enjoyment of sex -- she's just lying there like a log. 'Why are we going out?' men ask. 'Because a prostitute is 100 percent what I want. My wife is just for cooking and washing.' "

Of course, real-life relations between men and women are more complex. Jane, a Zimbabwean woman who asked that her last name not be used, says, "If your husband demands sex you are not allowed to deny him, but in practice you communicate and understand each other." The trouble is that such communication takes place on a field steeply tilted in favor of the man. Jane, for example, knew that her husband had a girlfriend on the side, and she took the step of asking him to use a condom. "My husband answered, 'I cannot use a condom with my wife,' " Jane recalls. "So I think that's why I got infected." She's not alone. A study from Zimbabwe found that more than half of women with STDs contracted their illnesses from their husbands. Marriage, say many AIDS workers, is a risk factor.

Anecdotal reports indicate that dry sex is waning among educated, urban young people. But there are also loud calls to reject Western gender roles, which are said to emasculate men. Even in the cities, says Matshe, "it's 50-50." Of course, most Africans still live in rural areas or small towns. And changing sexual practices is never easy, in part because they touch fundamental issues of personal identity and sexual roles.

It's not surprising that men like dry sex -- the swollen tissues make the vagina smaller and, therefore, make the man feel bigger. Also, some men (and women) find vaginal secretions repugnant, while others don't like the sound of wet sex. And to many men, a vagina that is too wet and loose can signify infidelity.

But some women also prefer dry sex. Mhakeni stopped only because she is HIV-positive and wants to protect herself against getting any sexually transmitted diseases that might weaken her immune system. Despite the pain of dry sex, she favors it. "It's our culture," she explains. Then she adds a reason researchers and AIDS workers say they hear over and over again: "If I don't use herbs, our men will go with someone else." Indeed, Mhakeni sells the herbs, and even when she warns women of the risks, they still buy. "They say, 'It is okay if HIV is brought in by my husband, because at least I will still be married.' "

Fanuel Adala Otuko looks every inch the leader of Kenya's Luo people: old, ramrod straight, missing six lower teeth pulled at age 12 as a rite of passage. "It is painful," he says, "but you cannot cry."

The Luos no longer pull their children's teeth, but Otuko and other elders want to revive some of the Luo's other traditions, especially those they believe might slow the spread of HIV, which has devastated them. In Kenya, Luo land is one of the hardest-hit areas in the country, with the rate of infection among adults in Kisumu, the city where Otuko lives, topping 20 percent.

All over Africa, AIDS workers are beginning to target male behavior. Around Kisumu, they are especially concerned about the fish merchants on the shores of Lake Victoria, who lure young girls with money. But Otuko and other Luo elders focus on women.

For example, the elders want to revive the ideal of female virginity. Traditionally, on the afternoon of a wedding, a dozen or more married women went to the newlyweds' home to check for blood, believed to be a sign of a woman's virginity. They also checked the man -- not for virginity, but for sexual prowess. They "witness that she has a normal man," explains Otuko, "a man who can have sexual relations with her."

The elders also want to take more aggressive steps. Against the recommendations of most public-health workers, they want to identify HIV-positive women and impose restrictions on them. "They should be controlled, quarantined in their areas," Otuko says. (Only when asked does he say that this restriction could also apply to men.) "AIDS is serious," he says. "There is no cure. So people should avoid contact with infected women, sexual contact especially." There's the rub, because one venerated Luo tradition usually involves sex with a widow -- and AIDS has caused a proliferation of widows.

Like many cultures in East and southern Africa, the Luo practice what is variously translated as home guardianship or, more commonly, widow inheritance. When a husband dies, one of his brothers or cousins marries the widow. This tradition guaranteed that the children would remain in the late husband's clan -- after all, they had paid a dowry for the woman -- and it also ensured that the widow and her children were provided for. When the guardian takes the widow, sexual intercourse is believed to "cleanse" her of the devils of death. A woman who refuses to take a guardian brings down chira -- ill fortune -- on the entire clan. Of course, if her husband died of AIDS, she might very well pass on the virus to her guardian. Millicent Obaso, a Luo public-health worker with the Red Cross, says: "We have homes where all the males have died because of this widow inheritance."

Danger to the inheritors is only one reason AIDS is putting this tradition under strain. Guardians are supposed to provide assistance, but even the elders concede that inheritors often take a widow only for sexual pleasure or to seize her property. According to tradition, a guardian must already have a wife of his own, so no matter how well-intentioned he may be, poverty often makes it impossible to support a second family.

Anna Adhiambo is standing where she and her husband used to live: in Ngeri village, on a fertile hillside that slopes down into the blue expanse of Lake Victoria. It's the first time she has been back since her late husband's family forced her off the property two years ago. Her husband died of AIDS in 1996, and she was inherited by his cousin. She expected him to help her feed her three children and pay their school fees (education in Kenya, as in most African countries, is not free). But he was a fisherman who had a family of his own, and "whenever he came from the lake," Anna recalls, "he said he didn't have enough. That was the song." They quarreled frequently, and five months after she was inherited, Anna decided to separate.

The consequences were swift and harsh. A group of men from the clan told her she and her children would have to leave the next day. She remembers that they called her an ochot, a whore who "goes from one man to another." When she asked them to "please leave me alone in my house," she recalls one of her brothers-in-law retorting, "This is our home. You shouldn't answer me rudely like that, and if you do so again, I will beat you."

Consolata Atieno is Anna's mother-in-law. She has been smoothing the earthen walls of a new hut, and on her hands the thick mud dries and cracks as she talks. Anna "violated tradition, broke a taboo," she says, so "we had to chase her and her children away. We felt the furniture and things in the house were my son's, so we took them. Anna did not buy them. And the land we took: Some we gave to my other sons, some we sold. In our tradition, a woman is the property of her husband's family. He bought her with the dowry."

Unable to farm, Anna now makes less than $10 a month doing odd jobs in a nearby town. The Akado Women's Group, a local agency, is assisting her, but so far only one of her three children is in school. How does Atieno feel about her grandchildren suffering? "When Anna was making this decision, she must have known the consequences." But if Anna cannot provide for them, her children will be at greater risk for continuing the cycle of infection. A study in Zambia, for example, found that a lack of education quadrupled the chances that a woman would contract HIV.

Otuko and the elders believe home guardianship could strengthen families like Anna's. What the elders want is to strip this tradition of its sexual component, transforming it into what they call "symbolic inheritance." They point out that nonsexual cleansing was practiced with aged widows who were past menopause. And in parts of Zambia and Zimbabwe, such symbolic rites have gained ground.

University of Nairobi philosophy professor Oriare Nyarwath believes nonsexual inheritance could bring "a dignified death to the practice, without making people feel culturally destitute." But, he notes, even symbolic guardianship implies that women are subservient to and dependent upon men. "The culture is patrilineal and patriarchal," he says. "The woman goes to live in the man's home, the woman fits within the man's culture. So necessarily she's not on the same footing as the man."

The most pernicious inequality is poverty, by no means a uniquely African phenomenon. Of the world's 1.3 billion living in abject poverty, 70 percent are women -- and most of them face the same basic problems as African women. "In pre-industrial societies women are trapped in their reproductive roles," says Geeta Rao Gupta, president of the International Center for Research on Women. In ICRW's numerous studies on HIV, women from Latin America, Asia, and Africa report that they dare not insist on safer sex -- or object to painful sex -- for fear of being abandoned by their men and spiraling down into destitution. No wonder that in a 19-country study, ICRW found that the lower women's status, the higher HIV.

There are few places where poverty is worse than in Nairobi's slums, vast warrens of tin shanties, open sewers, and garbage-strewn dirt roads. In Korogocho, one of the poorest and meanest sections, a maze of narrow passageways leads into a one-room shack where the aroma of vegetable stew simmering on an open fire competes with the stench of raw sewage wafting in from outside. This is the home of Mary, who asked that her last name not be used. Two babies -- Mary's seventh child and her first grandchild -- lie on the bed.

Just a week ago, one of Mary's johns -- who pay as little as 75 cents for sex -- slapped her in the face when she asked him to use a condom. "I can't eat a sweet in its wrapper," he said. Flashing back eight years to the man who beat her so viciously that she couldn't work for two days, she let her latest violent customer go ahead. He may pay for his pleasure with AIDS, because Mary is HIV-positive.

Mary wasn't born in the slums, but in a rural area 100 kilometers outside of Nairobi. There, rich red earth nourishes broad green leaves of the plantain tree, the billowing shrubbery of coffee plants, and the yellow-tufted stalks of maize. Mary's mother Beth sits in a hut, the door propped open with a machete, and explains why her daughter left. Her account corresponds exactly to the one given independently by her daughter. The tale they tell is an allegory of how women's powerlessness fuels the AIDS epidemic.

Mary's husband "was a drunkard," Beth says. He beat Mary virtually every week, burned her clothes, and denied her food. Once, when he was drubbing Mary, one of their children got in the way. The husband literally threw the seven-year-old girl aside. She landed on a rock, injured her lung, and was hospitalized for two weeks. Mary fled to her parents.

At first Mary's father, who died just this year, welcomed her home. But after a few days he realized that Mary and her children were extra mouths to feed. Mary recalls, "My father told me 'I have my own kids, so you're a burden to me. Pack up and go.' "

There are thousands of women like Mary in Nairobi, not to mention all of Africa, and to help curb the spread of HIV they need much more than AIDS awareness. "The women I work with say they'd rather die of AIDS tomorrow than die of hunger today," says Ann Waweru, director of the Voluntary Women's Rehabilitation Centre, an organization that helps sex workers, including Mary, find alternative work. It's not easy. "Most have no skills and no place to get a loan to start a business. A man is almost never burdened with children, so he can do casual work, earn 20 shillings, and survive on that. But most of the women we work with have children. They are driven to commercial sex by poverty."

According to the custom of the Kikuyu people, Mary's brothers were each given a plot of land to farm. But as a female child Mary was given nothing. At first, she tried to stay in the village, supporting herself and her children by doing odd jobs such as drawing water from the well and helping people till their fields. But her father wasn't satisfied and he would beat Mary and her mother. After six months Mary fled for Nairobi with her children and virtually nothing else.

In the city, she spent her first night at the home of a friend, who told her, "I'm going to show you how to get money." Mary turned her first john that night, and, she recalls, "I was happy because I got money to feed my children."

Research intern: Christine Brownlee

previous article in series | next article in series


This article was originally published in the Village Voice.

More articles by Mark Schoofs.



93 posted on 07/12/2003 7:32:10 PM PDT by Zipporah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
I think that you are. And Carlos.

Gee, isn't it fun to call people gay?

Please only post to me if you are interested in debating issues.

Trace
94 posted on 07/12/2003 7:32:15 PM PDT by Trace21230 (Ideal MOAB test site: Paris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: chasio649
Thanks .. seems culture is the culprit.
95 posted on 07/12/2003 7:33:12 PM PDT by Zipporah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
I would like to see your references.

See #65, there are more, readily accessible via any internet search engine.

Trace

96 posted on 07/12/2003 7:35:43 PM PDT by Trace21230 (Ideal MOAB test site: Paris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
I think that you are. And Carlos. Gee, isn't it fun to call people gay?

First there is nothing "gay" about homosexuals. Second it is time that you come out of the closet. ZOT?

97 posted on 07/12/2003 7:37:07 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
If you truly do believe that vaginal sex does not spread AIDS, you should discuss this with your doctor.

I don't need to ask my doctor. I can see the number at the CDC on the web. AIDS is NOT running rampent in the hetro community.

I would hate to see you come down with the disease just because of plain old ignorance.

Your concern for me is touching Trace.

I won't get AIDS. I'm not a fairy and I don't shoot needles. Aside from some innocent children and blood transfusion patients most AIDS carriers are homosexual, drug users, or the sexual partners of drug users or bisexual men. If it was not so we would see lots of women with AIDS in America. The numbers don't support your arguments.

98 posted on 07/12/2003 7:42:28 PM PDT by Once-Ler (I vote Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
I read the President of Liberia makes about $20,000 a year.

Plus all he can steal.

99 posted on 07/12/2003 7:47:43 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Zipporah
Where did you read in anything I posted that I doubted that AIDS was in Africa, the exact opposite is true.  I have only argued the methods of transmission are overwhelmingly perverted, abnormal, preventable and confinable.. but only if we tell the truth will see see an end to this horrible madness. AIDS is a WORLD WIDE DISGRACE, encouraged by deception, aided by ignorance.. and propagated by selfish greed. AIDS is a preventable scourge if we treat it as we have every other contagious epidemic in recorded history ..detect... trace.... isolate.. contain!
100 posted on 07/12/2003 7:47:57 PM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson