To: VRWC For Truth
Now, now, VRWC For Truth. You saw the rules for this thread in Post #1.
This thread is for civil discussion of the different theories and reasons behind this situation. It is not a place for bashing of posters with different opinions.
1 posted on 07/12/2003 2:52 PM CDT by Cathryn Crawford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Implication being, don't question the questioner. Post only if you agree or what you say will be considered bashing. We don't want to become a one-party system, now, do we? < /sarcasm WAY OFF >
586 posted on
07/12/2003 9:12:34 PM PDT by
arasina
(I'm not sure if I really care for indecisive people. Maybe I do; maybe not.)
To: arasina
Jim Robinson sets the rules. Please don't take it personally if I ignore you.
To: arasina
You're on to CC! She imagines that she knows it all and should one disagree, they're automatically wrong and bashing poor, little, high scholl graduate, 20 year old her. LOL
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson