To: William McKinley
I guess I am in the minority. I don't consider anything of the Niger/uranium tempest in a teapot to be of the utmost importance. I'm with you.
Btw, the Rats are gearing up for their (seemingly) bi-monthly "this is the next Watergate" mode. I wish I had a Ben Franklin for every "next Watergate" they've predicted.
47 posted on
07/12/2003 1:23:25 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: Mr. Mojo
Can you imagine how rich you would be?
52 posted on
07/12/2003 1:26:20 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: Mr. Mojo
I hate to show my stupidity here but what is the big deal about what GWB said in his SOTUA. I don't have the quote but didn't he say that from reliable British sources they had learned that Saddam had tried to purchase uranium ore from African nations. My question is, how would one prove or disapprove that inquiries had not been made to try to make these purchases? would these inquiries necessarly leave a paper trail? Would the people that Wilson talked to admit that they had conversed with Saddam's people?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson