Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sparta
That post was taken from the Washington Dispatch site and I posted the link. Full disclosure you know! Any first year journalism student with "Ethics in journalism" knows all about disclosure!

You would do yourself a favor not to treat us like we cannot read. If she supported the war fine -- that posting was an attack on SecDef Rumsfeld who I respect a lot more than ANY journalist!
227 posted on 07/12/2003 2:40:58 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom

The hawks, characterized by Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and Scooter Libby, found themselves at a distinct advantage after September 11, 2001. Suddenly they had a fully legitimate reason to do exactly what they had wanted to do for so long: completely restructure the Middle East. Consider the change in rhetoric concerning the regime in Saudia Arabia; our relationship with them went from being characterized as America’s "good friend in the Middle East" on September 10, to the Saudi family being suspected Al-Qaeda supporters on September 12. Coincidence? I don't think so. The hawks are using public rhetoric and private recriminations to set up the public for a series of American led attacks – whether they be financially, diplomatically, or militarily – on certain governments in the Middle East.

The chances of the current Operation Iraqi Freedom expanding into a regional war seem to be astounding. And the influential hawks that produce America's foreign policy have no qualms about admitting it. Richard Perle, resident fellow at AEI and one of Donald Rumsfeld’s main advisors at the Pentagon, says that with victory for the United States in Iraq, "We could deliver a short message, a two-word message: 'You're next.' " Perle is a man who know of which he speaks, as he was actively involved in the Pentagon before, during, and after the first Gulf War. The implication of that statement is that regimes like Iran, Syria, and Saudia Arabia could be the first to fall, followed shortly by Libya and Sudan...and so on and so forth.

The strategy in and of itself is brilliant. It began with the downfall of the Taliban. Do you remember all the talk of Afghanistan being ‘only the beginning’? Bush, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and company were quite serious when they said it. They were preparing the American people for a long campaign against dictatorships in every Middle Eastern country, with the long-term goal being the spread of democracy.

Where is the attack on Rumsfeld? It's simply restating his widely known views. She didn't attack them or defend them.

247 posted on 07/12/2003 2:48:28 PM PDT by Sparta (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
I have a lot of respect for Rummy, too.

He was the next level up boss of a good friend of mine.

I still suspect Rummy of being on of the leading puppet masters working for one world government to be led by the Anti-Christ. I do NOT respect that.

And I don't trust Rummy's personal lust for power. Nor would I put it past him as a puppet master to exercise some control over Bush.
417 posted on 07/12/2003 6:05:25 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson