Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH CALLS FOR FULL $15 BILLION FOR AIDS IN AFRICA
Reuters ^ | Sat July 12, 2003 10:08 AM ET | By Patricia Wilson

Posted on 07/12/2003 10:56:40 AM PDT by Uncle Bill

Bush Calls for Full $15 Billion for AIDS in Africa

Reuters
By Patricia Wilson
July 12, 2003 10:08 AM ET

President Bush pledged on Saturday to help Africa in its "courageous fight" against AIDS and called on the U.S. Congress to fully fund his $15 billion plan to combat the disease.

At the last stop on his five-day, five-nation African tour, Bush also said Washington would stand with its friends and allies to end regional wars. He and Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo were expected to discuss the possibility of the United States contributing troops to a mainly African peacekeeping force for Liberia at their meeting on Saturday.

Bush says he will join efforts to enforce a fragile cease-fire to end Liberia's civil war, but is waiting on reports from U.S. military experts in the West African state before deciding whether to send troops.

"Progress in Africa depends on peace and stability, so America is standing with friends and allies to help end regional wars," he said in his weekly radio address.

But Bush focused mainly on AIDS, a disease he said posed "one of the gravest dangers" Africa has ever faced.

He said the need for help was urgent, with almost 30 million people in Africa living with HIV/AIDS including three million children under the age of 15.

"People in Africa are waging a courageous fight against this disease," Bush said. He cited progress in Uganda, which he visited on Friday, saying the country had significantly reduced the rate of infection through a program of abstinence, faithfulness and education.

"Yet current efforts to oppose the disease are simply not equal to the need. ... Africa has the will to fight AIDS but it needs the resources as well."

CONGRESS UNDER PRESSURE

Bush's pledge came after Republicans in the House of Representatives moved bills backing his request for $2 billion next year to fight the global pandemic -- $1 billion less than the amount provided for in a plan he signed in May.

The $2 billion is in line with the White House request for the first year, but White House officials have said Bush would seek greater amounts in subsequent years.

"I urge the entire Congress to fully fund my request for the emergency plan for AIDS relief, so that America can help turn the tide against AIDS in Africa," he said.

In May, Bush signed into law a $15 billion plan to help combat the disease in Africa and the Caribbean, tripling U.S. spending over five years.

The new law, a surprise priority in the president's State of the Union address, means anti-viral treatment will be available to about 2 million HIV-infected people in Africa and the Caribbean who cannot afford the costly cocktail of drugs that can prolong and improve their lives.

It also provides hospice care for the dying, helps some of the 13 million children who have lost one or both parents and intensifies prevention programs through strategies like sexual abstinence, education and promotion of condom use.

The White House said the plan had the potential to prevent 7 million new HIV infections within a decade.

The AIDS initiative focuses principally on Botswana, Ivory Coast, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia, as well as Guyana and Haiti in the Caribbean.


LIMITED GOVERNMENT


President George W. Bush - Biography

SOURCE: http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html

"George W. Bush is the 43rd President of the United States. Formerly the 46th Governor of the State of Texas, President Bush has earned a reputation as a compassionate conservative who shapes policy based on the principles of limited government,..."


DON'T BE FOOLED AGAIN


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News
KEYWORDS: aids; bush; bushdoctrine; georgewgore; spending; worldsocialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: annyokie
preserving the health of children in any country

Exactly. There are over a billion children in the world under the age of 15, and I believe the US taxpayer is responsible for the health of every last one of them.

I think spending only $1000 dollars per year for each child is a trivial amount -- we're talking about a human child here, after all.

That works out to 1 trillion dollars, which is roughly a 50% increase in all taxes across the board. Income tax -- up 50%. Social security tax -- up 50%. Corporate tax -- up 50 %.

But remember, it's for the children.

21 posted on 07/12/2003 11:58:33 AM PDT by 7DayRepo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
How much of that money is actually part of the hidden intelligence budget? And limited government is an ideal that probably won't catch on in our lifetimes.
22 posted on 07/12/2003 12:01:08 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Unfortunately, politicians and the media are well aware that attaching the word "children" to anything guarantees the sucker moms will fall all over themselves supporting it.
23 posted on 07/12/2003 12:03:59 PM PDT by 7DayRepo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
The reason the US Government has decided to spend so much money on AIDS is to help keep the price of AIDS drug high and to enforce the Intellecutual Property rights of the AIDS drug owners.
Drug companies own patents on these drugs and several years ago Brazil dropped the patent for AZT and other drugs so they could afford to take care of their AIDS population. The US Governemnet and the drug companies immediately negioted a deal with the government of Brazil so they could produce and/or provide AIDS treatment for their citizens. Africa has
a low economic ability to pay for these drugs, this threatened the IP and Patent rights of the drug companies. So the US government has stepped up to the plate to help keep the drug companies from losing patents and money.
Of course 10% of the money will go to AIDS education and it will be some fat cat in Nigeria that will take the money, print up some pamplets and pass them around before he goes on a vacation around the world.
That is the real reason $15 billion US is being spent. Maybe the agony of a few AIDS suffers will be relieved, but what good does it do for a AIDS sufferer to receive AZT when he or she is starving to death or lives in a country riped apart by civil war?
24 posted on 07/12/2003 12:11:22 PM PDT by ac7xc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Thing
"But when oh when is a President going to get to our Veterans."

Good point, Wild Thing!
Clinton cut our vets programs, and GW has not reinstalled them.
Some families on active duty are still forced to live like poverty families.
Our VA Hospitals are still without the necessary items to make a vet's stay livable, much less comfortable.

Let's take care of our own like they took care of us!

25 posted on 07/12/2003 12:12:15 PM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ac7xc
Excellent analysis. Corporate welfare strikes again.
26 posted on 07/12/2003 12:14:29 PM PDT by 7DayRepo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
"reduced the rate of infection through a program of abstinence, faithfulness and education."

ABSTINENCE??!
That's a joke!

27 posted on 07/12/2003 12:15:27 PM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
I say we should triple it. Lets give them 40 billion! Make the cheap tax payers pay up. Most of Africa's problems are our fault anyway, and besides our economy is booming and theirs isn't.
28 posted on 07/12/2003 12:15:38 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
I'm all for sending the $$$ and educating the people. What I have problems with is who's pocket will it all go into without ever reaching the people.
29 posted on 07/12/2003 12:20:39 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
"Dubya is a compassionate conservative, IMHO."

No, in this instance Dubya is a liberal.
Giving money to Africa is pouring it down a gopher hole, and it will achieve the same result - none.
I've lived there and worked there for many years, which is something that GW and his advisors have not done.

30 posted on 07/12/2003 12:20:57 PM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
I don't think this is a bad thing. Why should millions of infants and children suffer? Dubya is a compassionate conservative, IMHO.

It is NOT his money! It is easy to be compassionate with money confiscated from someone else, if you haven't noticed it is always "FOR THE CHILDREN!" Somehow the money never gets to "The Children," it always seems to end up in the pockets of corrupt thugs.

31 posted on 07/12/2003 12:21:46 PM PDT by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
See #21.
32 posted on 07/12/2003 12:27:41 PM PDT by 7DayRepo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
"If it's about saving lives, why not push for DDT use in Africa? DDT will save more lives than any AIDS initiative, and it will be much cheaper."

There's no concern for lives, DDT, or Aids. Just elephants.


Bush as President:

Bush Asks for $15 Billion to Fight AIDS in Africa
I agree with you! Believe that Senator Bill Frist, M.D., who has gone to Africa and has seen how devastating this disease is to so many people that have gotten AIDs in Africa through no fault of their own. This epidemic could go around the world and strike more than the gay community.
20 posted on 01/29/2003 8:10 AM PST by PhiKapMom(Bush/Cheney 2004)
SOURCE


Clinton as President:

Clinton Wants $175 Million for AIDS Programs
"Can someone tell me how putting more money into prevention is going to help? It is actually quite simple -- safe sex and don't share needles. Probably the most basic answer is "Just Say NO! If someone doesn't know that by now after all the warnings during the last ten years then they are a moron! Is this State of the Union going to be the big give-away? Every day I read about another give-away. Only when it comes to the Defense Department is it a take-away."
2 Posted on 01/17/2000 19:44:57 PST by PhiKapMom
SOURCE


Vote Bush. There must be a reason why, somewhere.

33 posted on 07/12/2003 12:55:00 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
No problem just print more
paper and ink are cheap
34 posted on 07/12/2003 12:59:58 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
"Lets give them 40 billion!"

Maybe prescription drugs too! No, I know, how about a down payment on a hut:

Who stated the following:

"Government ought to have a policy that helps people with a downpayment."

A. - OR - B.

Answer

You are not hallucinating, he really wants to have the government provide downpayments.

35 posted on 07/12/2003 1:05:48 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
And we've set this goal, by the way, that we want there to be 5.5 million minority families owning a home over the next 10 years. Which means government ought to have a policy that helps people with a downpayment. People take a look at owning a home and they realize the downpayment is a frightening thought. We ought to have a downpayment assistance program out of Washington, D.C.

When I first read this statement from Bush, I knew right then and there, we were NOT dealing with a conservative President!

36 posted on 07/12/2003 1:24:37 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Just elephants.

I trust you don't mean this kind -


37 posted on 07/12/2003 1:26:21 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy; c-b 1
I agree that much of the monies for these babies ends up in someone's pockey (look at UNICEF). I don't see the harm in trying to help the sick and down-trodden. We do need an oversight commitee, though, and not the UN.
38 posted on 07/12/2003 1:38:05 PM PDT by annyokie (Admin Moderator has got it in for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
They are people, too. Would you like your own child to suffer and die? There is no stealing involved. It is AID. We can afford it and I think we should do it.
39 posted on 07/12/2003 1:40:27 PM PDT by annyokie (Admin Moderator has got it in for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Deport Billary
How is humanitarian aid unconstitutional?
40 posted on 07/12/2003 1:42:08 PM PDT by annyokie (Admin Moderator has got it in for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson