Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tenet Takes Responsibility for False Iraq Intelligence
AP via Drudge | 7/11/03 | By John Solomon

Posted on 07/11/2003 8:09:24 PM PDT by randita

Tenet Takes Responsibility for False Iraq Intelligence

CIA Director Admits Analysts Had Doubts About Information

By John Solomon

Associated Press Writer

Friday, July 11, 2003; 6:53 PM

WASHINGTON (AP) - CIA Director George Tenet acknowledged Friday his agency wrongly allowed President Bush to tell the American people that Iraq was seeking nuclear material from Africa when analysts had doubts about the quality of the intelligence.

"These 16 words should never have been included in the text written for the president," Tenet said in a statement released after Bush and his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, blamed the miscue on the CIA and members of Congress called for someone to be held accountable.

"This was a mistake," the director's statement said.

Tenet said the responsibility for vetting the allegations included in Bush's State of the Union address about Iraqi efforts to get uranium from Africa beloing to the CIA and ultimately with himself.

"Let me be clear about several things right up front," he said. "First, CIA approved the president's State of the Union address before it was delivered. Second, I am responsible for the approval process in my agency. And third, the president had every reason to believe that the text presented to him was sound."

Tenet said CIA officials reviewed portions of the draft speech and raised some concerns with national security aides at the White House that prompted changes in language concerning allegations that Iraq sought to buy uranium from the African nation of Niger. But he said the CIA officials failed to stop the remark from being uttered despite the doubts about its validity.

"Officials who were reviewing the draft remarks on uranium raised several concerns about the fragmentary nature of the intelligence with National Security Council colleagues," Tenet said. "Some of the language was changed. From what we know now, agency officials in the end concurred that the text in the speech was factually correct that the British government report said that Iraq sought uranium from Africa."

"This should not have been the test for clearing a presidential address," the statement continued. "This did not rise to the level of certainty which should be required for presidential speeches, and CIA should have ensured that it was removed."

Tenet's two-page statement came at the end of a tumultous 24 hours in which reports surfaced suggesting the CIA had raised concerns about the nature of the African allegations before the president made his speech.

That prompted Bush and his Rice to take issue. On a trip in Africa, they said Tenet's agency approved the language in the speech and never raised objections to them.

Members of Congress called on the CIA to be held accountable. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kansas, said Tenet was ultimately responsible for the mistake.

"The director of central intelligence is the principal adviser to the president on intelligence matters," Roberts said. "He should have told the president. He failed. He failed to do so," Roberts said.

Tenet said there were "legitimate questions" about the CIA's conduct and he sought in his statement explain his agency's role in the matter.

Although the CIA did not learn until well after the president's speech in January that some documents obtained by British intelligence that formed the basis of the Iraq-Niger uranium allegations were forged, CIA officials recognized at the beginning that the allegation was based on "fragmentary intelligence gathered in late 2001 and early 2002," the director said.

A former diplomat was sent by the CIA to the region to check on the allegations and reported back that one of the Nigerian officials he met "stated that he was unaware of any contract being signed between Niger and rogue states for the sale of uranium during his tenure in office," Tenet said.

"The same former official also said that in June 1999 a businessman approached him and insisted that the former official meet with an Iraqi delegation to discuss 'expanding commercial relations' between Iraq and Niger. The former official interpreted the overture as an attempt to discuss uranium sales," Tenet said.

The diplomat sent to the region has alleged he believed Vice President Dick Cheney's office was apprised of the findings of his trip. But Tenet stated that the CIA "did not brief it to the president, vice president or other senior administration officials."

Tenet said when British officials in fall 2002 discussed making the Niger information public, his agency expressed their reservations to the British about the quality of the intelligence.

A CIA report that came out in October 2002 mentioned the allegations but did not give them full credence, stating "we cannot confirm whether Iraq succeeded in acquiring uranium ore." In addition, the report noted that State Department intelligence analysts found the allegations "highly dubious."

Because of the doubts, Tenet said he never included the allegations in his own congressional tetsimonies or public statements about Iraqi efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction.

© 2003 The Associated Press


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; bushdoctrineunfold; iraq; josephwilson; niger; stateofunion; tenet; uranium; warlist; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Grampa Dave
If you have the time, check out the :

instapundit.com blog/

21 posted on 07/12/2003 12:08:51 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Wouldn't I like to see a major expose on Wilson. That would be the icing on the cake--which could be served with baked crow to the dems and the press.
22 posted on 07/12/2003 6:14:00 AM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; William McKinley
FYI...


23 posted on 07/12/2003 7:03:43 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
The real investigation should be why the CIA thought such a clearly political, partisan and unqualified person should be sent to Africa to resolve this sensitive issue.
Badabump!
24 posted on 07/12/2003 7:06:10 AM PDT by William McKinley (From you, I get opinions. From you, I get the story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randita
Has it been confirmed one way or another if Wilson was sent to Niger by the V-President's office?
25 posted on 07/12/2003 7:12:33 AM PDT by mystery-ak (The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
Is this like Janet Reno "taking responsibility" for Waco?
26 posted on 07/12/2003 8:35:29 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
You caught and nailed the whole point in your # 17.

Leni

27 posted on 07/12/2003 8:38:12 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Intelligence agencies often get things wrong..it's nothing new

The same media leftists and gimmies that are SO apoplectic about this TRUE statement (READ IT!) made in the SOTU address are the same simpletons that want to know WHY bits and pieces of intelligence were NOT put together from ANY source, despite it's reliabiltity, to paint the mosaic to PREDICT 911. Politics.......a game for the ages!

28 posted on 07/12/2003 8:48:54 AM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
1995-97 Political Advisor CinC US Armed Forces ,Europe

I did some research yesterday on Wilson....guess who was named CinC U.S. Armed Forces Europe in 1997??

Wesley Clark.

Then who do I see commenting on the uranium story yesterday.....Wesley Clark.

Clark is in up to his eyeballs in this uranium story..

29 posted on 07/12/2003 10:43:40 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
You may be very interested in this article where Straw stands by the uranium story and cites Wilson:

Straw defends UK dossier uranium claims

Excerpt:

"First, press reporting has claimed that this statement is contradicted by the report of a US envoy, Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who visited Niger in early 2002 to investigate the subject on behalf of the CIA. I want to make clear that neither I nor, to the best of my knowledge, any UK officials were aware of Ambassador Wilson's visit until reference first appeared in the press, shortly before your hearings last month. In response to our questions, the US authorities have confirmed that Ambassador Wilson's report was not shared with the UK.

"We have now seen a detailed account of Ambassador Wilson's report. It does indeed describe the denials of Niger government officials in early 2002 that a contract had been concluded for the sale of yellowcake to Iraq. But, as CNN have reported, Ambassador Wilson's report also noted that in 1999 an Iraqi delegation sought the expansion of trade links with Niger - and that former Niger government officials believed that this was in connection with the procurement of yellowcake.

"Uranium is Niger's main export. In other words, this element of Ambassador Wilson's report supports the statement in the Government's dossier.

30 posted on 07/12/2003 10:52:16 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
Good work everyone! Why are we the only ones doing any digging? PhiKapMom posted yesterday on another thread:
" And prior to going to Iraq, Wilson worked for Sen Albert Gore and Speaker Foley!"

Can you imagine if after Clinton's 98 bombing of the aspirin factory-the CIA sent a political ally of Newt Gingrich over to the region, as the primary fact finder???The cries and howls of partisan politics would have been deafening and anything the aide discovered,would have been immediately discounted.
31 posted on 07/12/2003 11:12:52 AM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bisesi
The same media leftists and gimmies that are SO apoplectic about this TRUE statement (READ IT!) made in the SOTU address are the same simpletons that want to know WHY bits and pieces of intelligence were NOT put together from ANY source, despite it's reliabiltity, to paint the mosaic to PREDICT 911. Politics.......a game for the ages!

Exactly. These people are such double-talking hypocrites.

I expect this will go the way of the anti-Bush hysteria over arsenic in the water, his supposed Enron connections, accusations that Bush "KNEW" about 9-11 ahead of time etc etc etc.

The Dems are so desperate for ANYTHING to bring Bush down they keep making total fools out of themselves.

32 posted on 07/12/2003 8:24:04 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson