The TRUE Capitol Hill Blue story the PRESS IGNORED:'Dems plan to undermine America to beat Bush'

FR - thru Capitol Hill Blue ^ | January 6, 2003 | DOUG THOMPSON

[kcar]

What if this scorched earth strategery is just the until the summer of '04, with everyone on attack unitl then, when it's discovered that none of the Rats can win the nod, so, Hillary is drafted. In she strides, taking the nomination reluctantly without engaging in any mudslinging, at other Rats or at Bush, and takes her party on a more stately civil course. The Media extols her for returning civility to politics, something they thought Bush had wanted to do but evidently failed, and she is swept into history.

[DannyTN]

What if this scorched earth strategery is just the until the summer of '04,..., so, Hillary is drafted.

That's exactly what I think is going to happen.

They will do anything in their power to bring Bush down and then try to substitute a clean candidate. I think it's going to be a very nasty campaign.

We've seen the SWITCHEROO from the Democrats twice recently. I think they will try it on the Presidential election because they have nothing to lose.

[BOBTHENAILER]

Fortunately, Roger Hedgecock is El Rushbo's substitute today and he's handling it quite well!

Glad to hear that news. I emailed it early this morning on my direct el Rushbo mail. Don't know or care if it was me, all I want is wide dissemination of this info.

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

When Kerry compared the President to a Saddam Insane in Iraq, he cast the patina of dictatorship underpinnings upon our voluteer, honorable military.

No. You are so right and thank you for saying it. Our troops are wondering why we're only hearing the bad news from Iraq. They know the Iraqi people are grateful, they're rebuilding the country and taking out the rats - and their fellow AMERICANS don't know. Nations around the world are also hearing the negative - LIES - and pulling back their support. So what the DEMS-PRESS are doing - intentionally - is absolutely hurting our troops, our efforts in Iraq - WHILE giving comfort and (false) hope to our enemies. It's outrageous.

Undermining the military and the police are old tactics of the activist far-left (Marxists, etc.). Not so easy to push this lie after 9-11, and the example of our brave police and firefighters at WTC - followed by the a whole world watching our honorable troops in action to free Afghani people from the Taliban and Iraqis from Saddam Hussein.

They keep trying.

My mass e-mail subject line yesterday. PRESS AWOL RE. TROOPS. Our fine military kicking bad guy derriere DAILY in Iraq are NO ONE'S "VICTIMS":

Thanks for standing up for the troops, MHGinTN. They need more than concerts and rallies. They need our radio hosts and reporters to REPORT the truth - from CENTCOM, the DoD and the troops - not the spin from the NY Times and socialist NGOS, to keep the big picture in perspective. We've been there FOUR months! Our troops have been doing awesome work across Iraq daily. They deserve better from the AMERICAN press.

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

Thnx, onyx. (^;

[BOBTHENAILER]

But it's not funny. This country is at stake, and I'm starting to think these people would dance on the grave of it if given the chance.

Couldn't have said it better myself. They are in their death throes and they will destroy anything and everything to prevent that.

I see 04 as the most bloody campaign in US history because they KNOW IN THEIR LITTLE RAT HEARTS that the end is near.

[kcar]

Yep, without having to have defined her views through the normal process of democracy. Hidden, locked away until stealth-launched with great fanfare as the great historic repeat of Clinton Vs Bush, like it was the second Punic War.

[Naspino]

My middle of the year resolution: Everytime the left ticks me off (like today's Bush-hate fest about a sentence in a speech 7 months ago) I'm going to donate to Bush's re-election.

[DannyTN]

"Yep, without having to have defined her views through the normal process of democracy."

I think it's the only chance she's got. The only question is who is going to be sacrificed as the frontrunner.

Hillary couldn't survive a year long campaign, not against George.

Watch them go for a very outspoken candidate who is used to running negative campaigns. (Negative campaigns? that doesn't narrow the field much! lol)

[PhiKapMom]

Was just watching Fox News when some ditz sitting in for Cavuto decided to cover this story of the State of the Union speech of Pres Bush -- the Bush lied.

Cong Blunt from MO was on our our side but Fox had Nadler on for the RAT side. Wanted to throw something at my TV with the way the red headed girl asked the questions to Blunt versus the way she asked them to Nadler.

Haven't been watching much Cable News lately, but Fox has sure changed from what I am seeing today or did I just pick a bad day to go watch cable news again? What gives? Fair and balanced is for the birds -- the RATs already have the rest of the cable news and networks locked up.

[FReepaholic]

>>...Capitol Hill Blue obtained a copy of the talking points when the Democratic National Committee sent them to a news outlet recently acquired by CHB’s parent company...<<

Interesting that they sent their talking points to thier toadies in the media. Not as a press release, I'm sure.

[PhiKapMom]

You may go broke in a hurry if today is any example but I sure like the idea!

[onyx]

If the FNC woman you're referencing is a Brenda somethin-er-other who often sits in for Caputo, she's one of FNC's resident democrats. Very partisan and quite rude. In fact, I'd call her a radical-left-winger, along the lines of Ela-manure Clift and Ellen Ratner.

[Grampa Dave]

This is a great position by you:

My middle of the year resolution: Everytime the left ticks me off (like today's Bush-hate fest about a sentence in a speech 7 months ago) I'm going to donate to Bush's re-election.

I just hope that you don't go broke!

I will donate another $24 today as per PKM's tactics.

[hoyaloya]

Were we say that Mexico had a WMD stockpile and was imminently going to use it against us - and use that information to justify removing their government via invasion, I can certainly see that that would be a problem.

However, when you give 100 reasons, and one, two, or ten prove to not have been correct, who cares? I don't think anyone other than hardcore anti-war (or anti-bush) types do.

I posit - which is worse:
(1) lying (giving full faith to what these idealogues don't appear to be able to show) about getting uranium from Africa . . . with the result being the historically unequaled victory in Iraq and the removal of a brutal regime or
(2) lying about a foreign government's offer to turn over Osama Bin Laden years prior to September 11, 2001?

We have multiple respected people stating, on the record, using their names, that (2) happened. We have a couple of unnamed sources saying that (1) happened. (Come on, if these "insiders" really thought this was such a big deal, shouldn't they show some cojones and step up and go on the record?)

I believe that the average American, when presented with these two situations, would say (2) is far worse. I don't think this thing has legs, unless the McCains join the battle.

[PhiKapMom]

Donna Brazille is on with Woodruff slamming Bush I take it because my TV was on mute after seeing the pictures of what the RATs had to say.

This is hitting below the belt with the President in Africa -- has to be Hillary behind this because she is just pure evil!

MSNBC covering a hurricane right now!

[PhiKapMom]

I never thought to ask -- just who is CHB's parent company?

[PhilDragoo]

Phil's note: I prepared the following white paper:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html

President Delivers "State of the Union"
The U.S. Capitol
9:01 P.M. EST
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
January 28, 2003

Excerpt follows:

Paragraph 67 of 86:

The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb. The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production. Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide.

~~~

Phil's note: I went to the online transcript of the President's State of the Union Address (see URL above) and copied the 67th paragraph with its second sentence intact.

That sentence in its unredacted entirety is as follows:

The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.

To this day Tony Blair stands behind his government's statement that Saddam Hussein sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.

He notes the British analysis was secondly sourced.

Certain forged intelligence was planted to sabotage the president, perhaps by our great friends the French.

Be that as it may, Iraq and Niger go back twenty years in uranium deals, and Blair maintains the current dealings took place.

Democrats have distorted the matter, stooping to their standard trick of misquoting: they lop off the attribution to the British government in Democrat attack ads.

Democrats have succumbed to mass amnesia as well, forgetting they supported Clinton's attacks on Iraq in 1998. The contemporaneous statements of Kerry, Biden, Daschle et al cited Iraq's WMD threat.

There's also a great deal of Monday-morning ass-covering by unnamed CIA weasels, O Dear We Pleaded With The President Not To Use That--I think these CIA lowlifes should come forward and fall on their swords.

Add to this the breathtaking failure of George Tenet, the Clinton Director of Central Intelligence, to foresee and forestall the attacks on Continental United States (CONUS) by Osama bin Laden, and one sees a man with his pants on fire and no one to blame but himself.

He might blame his appointer, Clinton, who refused the offer of Osama bin Laden by Sudan three times beginning in 1995.

Tenet pronounced as dogma the meeting of 911 commander Mohammed Atta and Iraqi intelligence agent Al Ani in Prague did not occur--despite the insistence of the Czech government that it did.

Now come the 90% Democrat media to trumpet the smear of "Bush lied".

Lost in their banging of trashcans in the alley are the twin admissions of CIA that the progress of Iran and North Korea in processing their fuel rods into nuclear weapons material is more advanced than previously thought.

[Just remember August 1998 when the CIA said rogue nations wouldn't pose an ICBM threat for fifteen years, North Korea threw a Taepodong over Japan. CIA: Catastrophe Is Assured.]

In sum, the Democrats would have you believe, if they chop up sentence two of paragraph sixty-seven of a seven-month-old speech, you're more endangered by that than by 1) Iraq seeking enriched uranium; 2) Iran producing enriched uranium; 3) North Korea producing enriched uranium.

To review: Iraq, Iran, North Korea have revealed their pursuit of nuclear weapons.

QED (Quod Erat Demonstratum, thus it is shown): Bush was spot on with his Axis of Evil label for these three bad actors.

Phil Dragoo

[BOBTHENAILER]

Great resolution, one I practice myself.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for the information!