[habs4ever]

You are being much more fair minded than me to DT.Read further into the thread, as my opinion and questions do change as I become more aware of DT's track record.This post by him is self serving tripe, as I hope you'll come to realize.It's worth the trouble to read the thread fully :)

[PhiKapMom]

I second reading this thread in its entirety as one of the most important threads ever on here. It has opened up the possibility of anonymous sources that quote the Administration in other news outlets as being plants IMHO!

[FairOpinion]

I'll scan the thread -- over 1000 posts!

I did have the idea that there was more to the story.

That is why I suggested that he has reasons to atone, because when it was something that embarrassed President Bush, he just jumped and printed it, instead of checking it out.

At the same time, I was trying to point out that if he is serious, he should do more than just write this one article and consider the matter closed, he should do what you suggested to find out who that guy really was and become an activist for truth and accurate reporting in the media, of which there seems to be less and less of.

I liked your suggestion of finding out who that guy really is and what his real connections are to those who may have political motives to plant certain fraudulent information in the press. This could just be the tip of the iceberg.

I hope he follows up on it.

He should also print a correction for every single article which was based on this fraudulent unnamed source, instead of just removing them from the archives, he owes that to all who were maligned by those previous various allegations printed as facts.