BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD

Capitol Hill Blue ^ | July 9, 2003 | Doug Thompson

[scott7278]

Ping!

[ClancyJ]

"Yes, this seems to be a familiar pattern from Mr. Thompson of writing hate articles about the White House and then apologizing when he can't back it up."

In reading through this thread and the links - I just thought the same thing.

Looks like a new ploy to create distrust of the Bush administration. Throw out lies, then come up with an elaborate reason for the error. Of course, the impression and the junk has been thrown into the media mill - any retractions are ignored when it can be used to hurt Bush. Yet, how can the author be at fault - he apologized for his erratic efforts. In fact, he receives accolades about his honesty.

I am not impressed with Mr. Thompson. Too quick to sprout off, too lax in verification, too willing to destroy the reputation of George Bush.

Another thing. Does anyone really believe that a person sets up a phony id and persona for 20 years to get in a propaganda lie against a GOP president to come along somewhere in the future?

[nopardons]

Right you are ! It's long past time, that all FREEPERs see Doug for exactly who and what he is; a liar, a fraud, and a weasel.

[MeekOneGOP]

Thanks for the heads up, folks !! Wow !

And great work , W.M.!

A thousand pardons if you've been pinged or seen this already. Thanks.

Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.

[Glenn]

Doug,

The scary thing about your actions is had Bill Clinton been the man you are, there would have been no impeachment. FreeRepublic would have been a footnote.

[happygrl]

If I am not mistaken, Cap said that the guy who ran the editorial in the NYT was not asked by the VP to look into the uranium story.

This is another huge story then.

Excellent that you took note. Anymore details ?

[happygrl]

Bush has been slimed in a big way and his character questioned. Now we see the story was picked up and printed elsewhere.

This was a matter of discussion last night on a long distance phone call

Yes, the original story will have legs, while the correction will have to be advocated for and explained again and agian.

[happygrl]

...the mystery "source" could be Deepthroat 2, or a clever, cynical journalistic stalking creation horse for one said...Doug Thompson?

I believe this nails it.

He made up the original story and the so-called Terrance J. Wilkenson.

He's much too volatile for a journalist.

Must be a hormone thing.

[piasa]

bttt

[metesky]

bttt

[William McKinley]

You are asking what I think, but I suspect my answer would get taken (perhaps not by you) as being what is true.

I do not at this time know what is true.

I suspect, however, that at this point Thompson is telling the truth now.

[Dog]

fyi...

[happygrl]

So, Pitt registered truthout.org on September10, 2001, the day before the WTC and Pentagon were hit and thousands died, uses the site to try to damage a US president, and then goes on to coauthor a book by a former UNSCOM inspector who's been carrying Iraqi water since at least 1999, a perv inspector who has admittedly accepted money from an Iraqi-American who happens to be one of Hussein's supporters? And then Pitt puts all of his efforts into opposing the strikes on both Afghanistan and Iraq? Ritter has his handler; maybe Ritter is Pitt's handler. Wonder how he gets paid?

In Bayer stock.

Cipro (Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride) Tablets, IV Solution, IV in 5% Dextrose, IV in 0.9% Saline, and Oral Suspension Company: Bayer Corporation Application No.: 19-537/S38, 19-847/S24, 19-857/S27, 19-858/S21, & 20-780/S8 Approval Date: 8/30/2000

You've just connected the dots between Saddam - 9/11.

[an amused spectator]

Thus I am unwilling to allow Free Republic to be used to damage Bush or ANY of the Republicans chances, especially with fabricated leftist propaganda. For this, I am labeled a traitor to the conservative cause. So be it. Come hell or high water I'm sticking to my guns on this one. The Democrats are NOT going to be allowed to retake control of our government any time soon and that's a fact!

You just know that the 'Rats are paying people full time to use this forum to damage Bush, since we're the most credible and widely-read conservative forum. ;-)

[an amused spectator]

I don't understand why it's taking more than 2 and a half years to get rid of the clintonistas in the judiciary.

Fred, why in the world do you think that the 40 Dems in the Senate are trying to control the 800 people in the federal judiciary?

They're trying to create an unappointed superlegislature that rules us for life. You know that. I've been following this issue since the Clintonistas tipped their hand back in the impeachment wars with "the Magnificent Seven".

Unfortunately, I believe the courts have gone past the "Dred Scott" point of no return in regards to their credibility.

[MEG33]

Speaking of TLBShow...Where is he?

[Neets]

Gawwwwd I LOVE YOU!!!!!

[Neets]

He is at the Little Peoples site holding feets to the fire.

[MEG33]

It's really depressing to think he'd been fooled for 20years by a trusted news source.

[an amused spectator]

Dunno. Heard he got booted by JR hisownself. I'm still looking around to see what happened, but only cursorily.