Replies

Before I can reason with you, you first must don an objective hat and realize that those of you who defend bush's obscene socialist spending spree are no better than the clinton apologists who defended their guy's indefensible positions. My first solution would be to polarize the TRUE Constitutional conservatives and the liberals, libertarians, moderates into separate parties.

You sit there day in and day out insulting those of us who disagree with your political savior and when we point out his 2 1/2 year record you choose the insult route rather than address the issues we bring forward. You don't even bother to refute what we post, rather, you use snide remarks
or out and out insults.

Truth be told, if any of you can really defend bush's programs (most of which are the dem's programs), then I suggest that you are closet liberals posing as conservatives. You chalk his embracing and adopting the dem's programs as smart politics, I say it's the same old lies, duplicity and deceit. Can a real conservative win, probably not. I would settle for a 75% Conservative agenda and a 100% honoring of their sworn oath to uphold the Constitution. Bush and his partners in crime have violated their oaths on at least three occasions, i,e,; CFR, "patriot 1" and "homeland" ( that word brings the word Fatherland to my mind). What was wrong with National Security? Probably not european enough for the coming New World Order.