Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarian Party: Color-Coded Terror Alert System is Useless and Should be Scraped
Libertarian Party press release ^ | July 4, 2003 | George Getz

Posted on 07/04/2003 10:14:58 PM PDT by Commie Basher

===================================
NEWS FROM THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY
2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, Suite 100
Washington DC 20037
World Wide Web: http://www.LP.org
===============================
For release: July 4, 2003
===============================
For additional information:
George Getz, Communications Director
Phone: (202) 333-0008
====================================

Color-coded terror alert system is useless and should be scrapped, Libertarians say.

WASHINGTON, DC -- The national color-coded terror alert system should be scrapped, Libertarians say, because it only alarms the public with warnings that are too vague to be useful.

"Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge risks becoming like the boy who cried wolf with his frequent, unsubstantiated orange alerts," said George Getz, Libertarian Party communications director. "Soon the public might start ignoring him -- and that could be a real disaster."

As the Fourth of July weekend approached, Department of Homeland Security officials declined to say whether they planned to raise the terror alert level from yellow to orange, the second-highest category. Since the system was instituted last fall, the threat has been raised to orange four times, and no attacks have taken place -- raising questions about the reliability of the underlying intelligence data.

One example: In February, Americans stockpiled food and water and rushed out to buy duct tape and plastic sheeting to seal their homes after the government warned about the risk of a chemical or biological attack.

At the time, Ridge claimed the intelligence reports were based on "multiple sources, obviously credible and corroborated." But days later he quietly canceled the alert after being forced to admit that the reports were "not as accurate as we thought."

An unreliable terror alert system may be worse than none at all -- which is why the program should be dismantled, Libertarians say.

"Telling a nation still reeling from the September 11 terrorist attacks to be on alert for another horrific attack -- without telling them when, where, or how it might occur -- is nothing more than scaremongering," Getz said. "In fact, every orange alert that is issued based on flimsy evidence actually endangers the nation by making Americans more likely to ignore future warnings."

The federal system also forces local police departments to squander tax money on unnecessary security precautions, he added.

"The U.S. Conference of Mayors estimates that cities spent $2.6 billion on additional security costs since the September 11 attacks, much of it related to 'code orange' overtime costs for police and other emergency personnel," Getz said. "These warnings actually made America less safe, because every dollar spent on imaginary threats is a dollar that can't be spent arresting an actual murderer, robber or rapist."

The solution is to replace the gimmicky color-coded system with one based on law enforcement needs rather than political posturing, he said.

"If the federal government obtains a specific, credible threat, it should share it immediately with local law enforcement officials and let them take the appropriate steps to warn and protect the public," he said. "But in the absence of solid information, it should cut the political chatter and refrain from alarming 280 million Americans with a vague, generalized terror alert."

Libertarians believe that preventing another terrorist attack is one of the most important functions of the federal government -- and that's why Americans should insist that it's done right, he said.

"This Fourth of July, let's declare our independence from unnecessary fear by pulling the plug on this counterproductive terror-alert system," he said.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; homelandsecurity; libertarianparty; libertarians; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-269 next last

1 posted on 07/04/2003 10:14:58 PM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
bump
2 posted on 07/04/2003 10:20:55 PM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher

Okay, get in there with your scraper!

3 posted on 07/04/2003 10:21:55 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
*yawn* libertarians once again demonstrate their limited grasp of reality and their futile fixation on dogma over common sense.... *yawn*
4 posted on 07/04/2003 10:22:02 PM PDT by ahadams2 (I studiously avoid responding to libertarians to avoid them seeing themselves as adults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
Libertarian Party: is Useless and Should be Scraped
5 posted on 07/04/2003 10:22:42 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
Too bad the administration isn't as smart as the Libertarians.
6 posted on 07/04/2003 10:22:43 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahadams2
Oh, c'mon. You know they're not happy unless their panties are in a wad over one thing or another.
7 posted on 07/04/2003 10:23:03 PM PDT by The Coopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher

That's kind of describes the L.P.

8 posted on 07/04/2003 10:23:12 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
HA! This from the party that gave us.....

Oh, that's right. They've never made enough impact for us to remember a single candidates name......
9 posted on 07/04/2003 10:24:41 PM PDT by The Coopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
You know why Commies are better than Libertarians ?

Because at least Commies know what they're doing. LOL

10 posted on 07/04/2003 10:25:24 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Coopster
Be fair. They had that guy get elected to a school board in Nebraska or some place around there. Of course most voters thought he was a "Librarian" when they voted for him.
11 posted on 07/04/2003 10:26:06 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ahadams2
Libertarianism is liberal "let's pretend" swung so far around they claim to be on the right of the spectrum. Please, no trifling about 'consequences' when you're talking to a Libertine (or a liberal)

I have some ideas for my new Libertarian world: First, no stop signs. People will stop because it's their duty.

< yawn >
12 posted on 07/04/2003 10:26:20 PM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
LOL!
13 posted on 07/04/2003 10:28:13 PM PDT by The Coopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher

Seems that the Consentius Maximus Party should first make sure that the vast majority of Americans do not consent to being murdered by terrorists first before making such broad generalizations, and even then care must be given to the small minority who may actually give their consent to it.

14 posted on 07/04/2003 10:30:25 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
Always one toke over the line.
15 posted on 07/04/2003 10:30:45 PM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Coopster
The sad thing is, my comment was only half jest.

Before the last elections I used to monitor the lp website so I could post the "facts" directly from the source and not the redone stuff their supporters were posting here.

On their main website the lp was all excited because they had one a school board election somewhere in middle America.

The Not Ready For Prime Time Party.

16 posted on 07/04/2003 10:30:49 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
LOL, Here we go again :-)

This nonsense from the LP makes Ozzie Osbourne's family look less disfunctional than the Libertarian Party. Maybe we should disolve the Department of Defense as well?

:-)

17 posted on 07/04/2003 10:31:32 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The Gifted One is Clueless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
Man. A post cant' even be made with the word libertarian in it w/out people hurling insults.

So, will you attack Rush now since he also has criticised the color coded system?
18 posted on 07/04/2003 10:33:43 PM PDT by LilithUnfair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher

Tom Ridge should ask Harry Browne how he copes with being ignored.

19 posted on 07/04/2003 10:34:43 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
On one side there are the people who claim that the LP shouldn't bother with presidential elections and should instead start small. On the other are those who deride local elections won by libertarians. The LP might as well ignore both sides and do what it thinks best.
20 posted on 07/04/2003 10:37:23 PM PDT by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-269 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson