Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Garfield is shot - July 2, 1881
The Columbus Dispatch | July 2, 2003 | Gerald Tebben

Posted on 07/02/2003 11:55:26 AM PDT by flutters

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
A bit of history for today.
1 posted on 07/02/2003 11:55:26 AM PDT by flutters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: flutters
I forgot to add a source link. The article can be found at columbusdispatch.com but you have to be a subscriber to read the articles. :(
2 posted on 07/02/2003 11:57:48 AM PDT by flutters (God Bless The USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
I drive past Garfield's home almost every day.
3 posted on 07/02/2003 11:58:20 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
Well I must say, the man sounds just a tinge more sane than today's democrats.
4 posted on 07/02/2003 11:58:31 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
After he shot Garfield, the assassin shouted: "I am a Stalwart! Arthur is now President." Few people know there was a political angle to the murder. See www.republicanbasics.com for more information.
5 posted on 07/02/2003 11:58:53 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
Sherman did no such thing. Guiteau was hanged on June 30, 1882.

Now that's quick justice.

6 posted on 07/02/2003 11:59:52 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
He was hung two days short of one year after he shot President Garfield. Not quick enough justice!

If he was seen doing it and apprehended on the spot, thirty days should have been enough to hold a tial and exterminate this bug.
7 posted on 07/02/2003 12:03:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flutters
Isn't he the one that died as a result of an infection that set in when doctors attempted to dig and dig for the bullet in the belief that the bullet had to come out for survival?
8 posted on 07/02/2003 12:08:04 PM PDT by admiralsn (Yada, yada, yada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: admiralsn
I'm sorry, but I don't know. I should brush up on my history before posting an article. I'll see if I can find the answer for you.
9 posted on 07/02/2003 12:13:15 PM PDT by flutters (God Bless The USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: flutters
bump
10 posted on 07/02/2003 12:14:06 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
Cozzens, in his trilogy The Civil War in the West didn't appear to damn him but certainly didn't confirm him as anything but a politically social climbing soldier of convienience. However, I'm only in the second volume (on Chickamagua) so perhaps he gives him some redemption later.

I did notice a new bio of him at Barnes and Noble today.

11 posted on 07/02/2003 12:15:58 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
The Library of Congress - Today in History
In the President's madness he has wrecked the grand old Republican party, and for this he dies.

Comment of Charles Guiteau, two weeks before shooting President Garfield,
From evidence given at Guiteau's Trial,
John K. Porter's Closing Speech to the Jury in the Guiteau Trial, January 23, 1882.

On July 2, 1881, Charles J. Guiteau shot and fatally wounded the new President James A. Garfield in the lobby of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Depot in Washington, D.C. as he yelled, "I am a stalwart and Arthur is President now!" Guiteau, a lawyer with a history of mental illness, blamed the president for not selecting him for a job at the U.S. Consulate in Paris.

Afflicted with religious delusions, the factionalism of the election of 1880 had given Guiteau's paranoia a political focus. He expressed several times the conviction that he had been commissioned by God to murder Garfield, and was surprised to discover that his action was deplored by Garfield's political opponents and supporters alike. In spite of Guiteau's manifest insanity at his trial, his attorneys were unable to gain an acquittal on that basis.

President Garfield did not die immediately, but lingered for 11 weeks, during which time surgeons attempted to find the bullet which had lodged in his back. In spite of Joseph Lister's discoveries on the use of antiseptics in surgery, the practice of sterilization had not caught on, and Garfield's wound was probed by the unwashed fingers of many physicians. The infection which ensued in his wound caused his death.

On July 2, 1881, Charles J. Guiteau shot and fatally wounded the new President James A. Garfield in the lobby of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Depot in Washington, D.C. as he yelled, "I am a stalwart and Arthur is President now!" Guiteau, a lawyer with a history of mental illness, blamed the president for not selecting him for a job at the U.S. Consulate in Paris.

Afflicted with religious delusions, the factionalism of the election of 1880 had given Guiteau's paranoia a political focus. He expressed several times the conviction that he had been commissioned by God to murder Garfield, and was surprised to discover that his action was deplored by Garfield's political opponents and supporters alike. In spite of Guiteau's manifest insanity at his trial, his attorneys were unable to gain an acquittal on that basis.

President Garfield did not die immediately, but lingered for 11 weeks, during which time surgeons attempted to find the bullet which had lodged in his back. In spite of Joseph Lister's discoveries on the use of antiseptics in surgery, the practice of sterilization had not caught on, and Garfield's wound was probed by the unwashed fingers of many physicians. The infection which ensued in his wound caused his death.

On September 6, Garfield was sent to the New Jersey shore in an attempt to aid his recovery. Despite initial signs of improvement, he died two weeks later of an infection in his back and an abdominal hemorrhage. Charles J. Guiteau was hanged on June 30, 1882.

Garfield's incapacitation sparked a constitutional crisis. The Cabinet was divided over whether Vice President Chester Arthur should assume the office of the incapacitated president or merely act in his stead. Because Congress was out of session, the issue remained unresolved at the time of Garfield's death. The Twenty-fifith Amendment (1967) to the Constitution addresses the succession of power to the Vice President in the event of a President "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."



Washington, D.C.--The attack on the President's life--Scene in the ladies' room of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad depot--
The arrest of the assassin / from sketches by our special artist's [sic] A. Berghaus and C. Upham.


New Year's greeting from presidential assassin Charles Julius Guiteau to his jailer, 31 December 1881.

Presidential assassinations maintain a strong hold on the American imagination. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy (1917-1963) continues to resonate with Americans, and Abraham Lincoln's murder holds a central place in the nation's memory. Many Americans have at least some awareness of the murder of William McKinley (1843-1901), which elevated Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) to the presidency. Far less known, however, is the assassination of the nation's twentieth president, James A. Garfield (1831-1881). Garfield died on 19 September 1881, seventy-nine days after being shot in the back at a Washington, D.C., railroad station. Garfield's assassination is poorly remembered today, largely due to the short span of time he served in office, only four months, and the little that was achieved during his presidency. Yet at the time, Garfield's death was deeply mourned, and his life's achievements would be impressive in any era. The son of poor Ohio farmers, Garfield acquired a Williams College education and later became a teacher and college president. He served as a Union major general early in the Civil War and in 1863 was elected to the United States House of Representatives. A compromise candidate for a divided Republican Party, Garfield defeated Democratic nominee Gen. Winfield Scott Hancock (1824-1886) by a slim margin in the 1880 presidential election.

Garfield's assassin was Charles Julius Guiteau (1841-1882), an Illinois native with a checkered career and erratic personal life. A failure at academic and journalistic pursuits, Guiteau turned to law, embarking on a marginal career tainted by dishonest practices. He also styled himself a preacher and student of religion, and as a young man spent several years at John Humphrey Noyes's utopian community in Oneida, New York. But Guiteau's lectures and writings on Christianity drew only meager audiences. Despite his dim career prospects, Guiteau lived well beyond his means, staying in fashionable hotels and purchasing expensive clothing without paying the bills. He was also known to be abusive, mistreating his wife (who divorced him in 1874 for his dalliances with prostitutes) and at one point threatening his sister with an axe.

By 1880 Guiteau had developed an interest in national politics. He was a hanger-on at Republican headquarters in New York City during the presidential campaign, and published a speech in support of Garfield's candidacy. After Garfield's election, Guiteau repeatedly pestered the president and members of his cabinet for appointments to diplomatic posts. Disappointed by their rebuffs, in spring 1881 Guiteau had what he described as a divine inspiration to take the president's life. Doing so, he believed, would heal the factionalism in the Republican Party and thereby save the nation. After stalking Garfield for several weeks, Guiteau shot the president in a Washington, D.C., railroad terminal on 2 July 1881.

Garfield survived until September, and Guiteau, captured at the scene of the assassination, stood trial for murder in November 1881. The trial was a national sensation and an important legal case as well, as Guiteau's attorney argued that his client was insane at the time of the shooting, an early use of such a defense. The trial became a forum on the issue of legal insanity, as thirty-six doctors testified as expert witnesses. Guiteau's conduct at trial also was notable. He constantly interrupted and berated the prosecuting attorneys, witnesses, judge, and even his own counsel, and he relished his celebrity status. Dozens of people wrote to him, seeking his autograph. Shown here is one such autograph, given to his jailer on the occasion of New Year's Eve 1881. Guiteau viewed the public's interest as an indication of support and a sign that he would be acquitted. But the jury rendered a guilty verdict on 26 January, and on 30 June 1882, Guiteau was executed by hangman's noose.


12 posted on 07/02/2003 12:17:55 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If he was seen doing it and apprehended on the spot, thirty days should have been enough to hold a tial and exterminate this bug.

Maybe in the good old days. Nowadays he'd spend 20 years on death row racking up taxpayer costs for multiple appeals.

13 posted on 07/02/2003 12:19:14 PM PDT by 1Old Pro (The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
No doubt.
14 posted on 07/02/2003 12:31:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: admiralsn
Yes, it was botched. From this link:

http://www.aarrgghh.com/no_way/garfield.htm

His death included all of the worst elements that could be found in a presidential medical crisis: faulty diagnosis, grossly improper treatment, prideful bickering among doctors, a massive cover-up — in short, Garfield never had a chance.
15 posted on 07/02/2003 12:32:59 PM PDT by flutters (God Bless The USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: flutters
As William McKinley lay after being shot in 1901, he spoke the words of the hymn "Nearer My God To Thee."
16 posted on 07/02/2003 12:39:27 PM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If he was seen doing it and apprehended on the spot, thirty days should have been enough...

I think it was a good idea to hold up on the trial until the victim died, which took nearly three months. Then it was a long and complex trial, owing to the insanity defense. There were thirtysome expert witness, if memory serves. The outcome was not affected, and justice was served in the end. He barely had time to get his affairs in order before his hanging. I think justice was swift enough in this case. If this timetable were in use today, think of the human rubbish that would not be using up our air.

17 posted on 07/02/2003 12:41:01 PM PDT by Wingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wingy
I agree with you comments. The death of Garfield being delayed is an important factor. As you said, one year is reasonable.
18 posted on 07/02/2003 12:43:10 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: flutters
Also on July 2 ...

Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789
TUESDAY, JULY 2, 1776

Sundry letters were laid before Congress, and read, viz:

One from General Washington, of the 30 of June, enclosing an extract of a letter from General Ward, of the 23d of said month; a copy of a letter of the 19th from Lieutenant Colonel Campbell to General Howe; a copy of an anonymous letter dated Watertown, 21 of the same month:1

[Note 1: 1 This letter is in the Papers of the Continental Congress, No. 152, II, folio 139. It is printed in the Writings of Washington (Ford), IV, 196. The copy of Campbell's letter is not with it.]

One from the council of Massachusetts bay2 of the 26th: and

[Note 2: 2 The letter from the Council of Massachusetts Bay is in the Papers the Continental Congress, No. 65, I, folio 89. That of Governor Trumbull is in No. 66, I, folio 189.]

One from Governor Trumbull of the 20th of the same month.

A letter from the pay master general, with a return of his weekly account:

Ordered, That the last with the weekly account be delivered to Board of Treasury:

Ordered, That the letter from Lieutenant Colonel Campbell to General Howe, be published:

Resolved, That the other letters be referred to the Board of War and Ordnance.

The Congress resumed the consideration of the resolution agreed to by and reported from the committee of


Page 507

the whole; and the same being read, was agreed to as follows:

Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and, of right, ought to be, Free and Independent States; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and that all political connexion between them, and the state of Great Britain, is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.1

[Note 1: 1 This report, in the writing of Charles Thomson. is in the Papers of the Continental Congress, No. 23, folio 17.]

Agreeable to the order of the day, the Congress resolved itself into a committee of the whole; ∥and, after some time,∥ the president resumed the chair. Mr. [Benjamin] Harrison reported, that the committee have had under consideration the declaration to them referred; but, not having had time to go through ∥the same,∥ desired leave to sit again:

Resolved, That this Congress will, to morrow, again resolve itself into a committee of the whole, to take into their farther consideration the declaration on independence.

The Congress being informed, that, in obedience to their order, Captain Whipple and Captain Saltonstal were come to Philadelphia; Whereupon,

Resolved, That the Marine Committee be directed to enquire into the complaints exhibited against them, and report to Congress.

∥Adjourned to 9 o'Clock to Morrow.∥


19 posted on 07/02/2003 12:49:46 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
Yes. And you have to pay for it if you dont subscribe to their newspaper. That paper isn't worth it.
20 posted on 07/02/2003 3:01:40 PM PDT by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson