Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Is Arnold qualified to be Governor?
http://msnbc.com/news/778726.asp?cp1=1 ^

Posted on 07/02/2003 9:26:30 AM PDT by submarinerswife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: stuartcr
Was Pat Brown more qualified than Reagan?
41 posted on 07/02/2003 11:00:01 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife
I am sure Arnie could bend a few ears in the legislature.
42 posted on 07/02/2003 11:01:33 AM PDT by oldcomputerguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife
Absolutely not! No Gravitas.....(sarcasm - off).
43 posted on 07/02/2003 11:01:34 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife
Ah-nold is just as qualified to be Governor as any other cyborg, but let's face it -- he's going to be liberal about everything except regarding the issue of the 2nd Amendment.

Perhaps in that case he'll be an advocate of personal use laser guided nuclear-tipped armaments.

44 posted on 07/02/2003 11:02:11 AM PDT by F16Fighter (What color pants-suit did Hitlery wear today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TatieBug
There's no way he can promote "Terminator 3" and at the same time do ANYTHING against the 2nd Amendment.

With all due respect, you are fooling yourself.

Have a look at any Hollywood type who's starred in a shoot-em-up film. Almost without exception[*] they are ALL anti-Second Amendment.

Bottom line: just because Ahhnold has been in a bunch of gunslinging films doesn't mean his politics are in sync with gun owners or the Second Amendment. His public statements have made that plainly apparent. And if he were elected and acted on those anti-2A public statements, the Left would not criticize him for hypocrisy; they'd hail him as a "reasoned man."

-Jay

* - Kurt Russell, Charlton Heston and a handful of other actors are the exception, not the rule.

45 posted on 07/02/2003 11:02:32 AM PDT by Jay D. Dyson (Liberty * Liberalism = Constant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife
3974 responses: YES = 59%
46 posted on 07/02/2003 11:05:44 AM PDT by onyx (Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Thanks for this link.
Haven't had time to investigate the entire site, but I found a political quiz that tells you where you stand philosophically. I tested 60% Libertarian.
47 posted on 07/02/2003 11:14:47 AM PDT by stanz (Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
" What is libertarianism?
Decide for yourself."

Actually, I was looking for an explanation or definition of libertarianism. I was more interested in why you thought that fit Arnie OR Kalifornia....to a T or otherwise.

48 posted on 07/02/2003 1:45:47 PM PDT by evad (Hitlary..lying..It's WHAT she does, it's ALL she does and she WON'T stop...EVER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: evad
Live and let live...but take responsibility for your actions and their consequences.

It's not possible to impose a single moral code on as diverse a population as inhabits our state but most people can agree that you should carry your weight.

This may not seem to be the case given the welfare abuses, illegal aliens, etc. but I think it is.

49 posted on 07/02/2003 1:59:16 PM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I don't know.
50 posted on 07/02/2003 1:59:33 PM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TatieBug
There's a pretty big difference between real-life 2nd amend, and the movies.
51 posted on 07/02/2003 2:01:28 PM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: evad
"Actually, I was looking for an explanation or definition of libertarianism. I was more interested in why you thought that fit Arnie OR Kalifornia....to a T or otherwise."

Boy, talk about how a couple of missing letters can change a meaning..the post should have stated..
"Actually, I WASN'T looking for an explanation or definition of libertarianism. I was more interested in why you thought that fit Arnie OR Kalifornia....to a T or otherwise.

Sorry for the confusion.

52 posted on 07/02/2003 4:02:31 PM PDT by evad (Hitlary..lying..It's WHAT she does, it's ALL she does and she WON'T stop...EVER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
"Actually, I was looking for an explanation or definition of libertarianism. I was more interested in why you thought that fit Arnie OR Kalifornia....to a T or otherwise."

Boy, talk about how a couple of missing letters can change a meaning..the post should have stated..
"Actually, I WASN'T looking for an explanation or definition of libertarianism. I was more interested in why you thought that fit Arnie OR Kalifornia....to a T or otherwise.

Sorry for the confusion.

53 posted on 07/02/2003 4:04:48 PM PDT by evad (Hitlary..lying..It's WHAT she does, it's ALL she does and she WON'T stop...EVER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife
Gee, I wonder why Tom McClintock doesn't get a poll question like this, but Arnold does? It's all about Name recognition.

Arnold is no more qualified to be Gub then Ralph Nader. Never held elected office. Never proposed a budget.

Yeah, some catch California, Suck up the swill!

This is what the media is feeding the masses these days. Pap!

54 posted on 07/02/2003 4:44:43 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi..Support FR . "California-Fighting the rising tide of socialism" . http://www.DRAFTTom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
I got your meaning without the correction...and my previous post was meant as a response. I find Arnold's social position to be best described as live and let live but take responsibility...and that seems to me what Californians can agree on.
55 posted on 07/02/2003 4:47:35 PM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Thanks so much for this info - I knew he had a degree, but I couldn't find out what it was.

I'm still partial to Tom McClintock, but if Ahnold runs, it will be a difficult choice.
56 posted on 07/02/2003 6:26:56 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife
Question:"Poll: Is Arnold qualified to be Governor?"

Response: No.

Comment: How has that little fact ever stopped the American people from electing some hack! Especially over the last 40 years or so, i.e. Clinton!

57 posted on 07/02/2003 6:38:27 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife
Poll: Is Arnold qualified to be Governor?

The question should be, is anyone qualified to be Governor of California? The second question should be, does anyone really care?

As for Arnold, he's probably the least qualified, and the most likely to win. And what does that say about California?

58 posted on 07/02/2003 6:42:19 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson