Skip to comments.
Freep This Poll - Smoking Ban Goes Into Effect Today
WFTV Orlando ^
| UPDATED: 6:37 a.m. EDT July 1, 2003
| www.wftv.com
Posted on 07/01/2003 7:37:12 AM PDT by Tank-FL
ORLANDO, Fla. -- No longer will smoking be allowed in Florida restaurants. Today, the new state law goes into effect banning smoking at restaurants and indoor work places.
Restaurants in Central Florida have been warning customers of the new law by placing stickers notifying them that, after Monday, they will no longer be able to light it up inside. Gov. Bush signed the new legislation that voters approved last November
(Excerpt) Read more at wftv.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: florida; pufflist; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Freep this poll, 54 % would drop a dime on you smokers.
1
posted on
07/01/2003 7:37:12 AM PDT
by
Tank-FL
To: Tank-FL; *puff_list; Just another Joe; SheLion; Great Dane; Flurry; dubyaismypresident; ...
PUFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2
posted on
07/01/2003 7:40:38 AM PDT
by
Gabz
(anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
To: Tank-FL
A nation of "Rat Finks"
To: Gabz
I get virus warnings when I try to read thew whole thing. Are bars included or excluded in ban?
4
posted on
07/01/2003 7:52:07 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Read Buddy's, (the labrador retriever), new book about the Clintons, "Living Hell")
To: Flurry
Stand alone bars are excluded, but bars inside restaurants are included.
5
posted on
07/01/2003 7:53:38 AM PDT
by
Gabz
(anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
To: Gabz
Well then I can still go to FLA for now.
6
posted on
07/01/2003 7:54:14 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Read Buddy's, (the labrador retriever), new book about the Clintons, "Living Hell")
To: Flurry
but don't go to Delaware.
Like the Florida Ban, the enforcement of the Delaware ban is driven by customer complaints. Legislation to change who got fined for violations was defeated in the Senate yesterday, because the governor threatened to veto it.
Currently the establishment gets fined, the proposal would have given the fine to the smoker.
7
posted on
07/01/2003 7:57:18 AM PDT
by
Gabz
(anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
To: Gabz
Whut a crock of poop. Pass a law against private business then expect them to enforce it. Smoke Storm Troopers need to be hired to monitor each banned building and be paid for by the business man. SARCASM
8
posted on
07/01/2003 8:00:40 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Read Buddy's, (the labrador retriever), new book about the Clintons, "Living Hell")
To: Tank-FL; LloydChristmas
The poll is:
"It will be up to customers to report smoking ban violations. Would you report a business that was in violation?"
If the ban is a law, is it not our duty to report the crime, or do we only enforce laws we agree with?
To: Tank-FL
It will be up to customers to report smoking ban violations. Would you report a business that was in violation? |
Choice |
Votes |
Percent of 897 votes |
Yes, the first time I see it happen |
346 |
39% |
Yes, but only after I see it happen more than once |
108 |
12% |
No |
413 |
46% |
Not sure |
30 |
3% |
Thank you for voicing your opinion in our online survey! |
10
posted on
07/01/2003 8:13:03 AM PDT
by
metesky
("Let us go among them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, "The Searchers")
To: HarryDunne
While I understand your point, I respectfully disagree in this type situation.
As written, this law, as well as the one in Delaware, are in essence turning over the enforcement to the public.
If the state isn't going to enforce a law - why is it on the books to begin with?
11
posted on
07/01/2003 8:15:15 AM PDT
by
Gabz
(anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
To: HarryDunne
Yes, the first time I see it happen
To: HarryDunne
I'm so happy to know that you are an employees of the state.
13
posted on
07/01/2003 8:17:05 AM PDT
by
Gabz
(anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
To: Gabz
Wouldn't it be wise of the bar owner and smoking customers to start ferreting out the rats?
This method of course does not allow for a smoker who has some secret grudge against the owner or another customer.
14
posted on
07/01/2003 8:17:20 AM PDT
by
metesky
("Let us go among them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, "The Searchers")
To: Gabz
I'm so happy to know that you are an employees of the state.Already resulting to insults?
To: Tank-FL
voted "No". i want a taste of that sweet sweet civil disobediance.
To: metesky
It's been happening in Delaware since the beginning of the ban back in November.
Businesses, particularly the bars, are being hard hit in more ways then one. First of course is the fact that business is WAY down. Then there are the scam artists who have a couple of drinks and step out supposedly for a smoke and don't bother coming back to pay their tab. And then there is the need for increased security outside the establishments. It's an absolute mess - and I understand it is even worse in NYC.
As to the scammer/scrammers more times than not, at least in the establishments I am familiar with - that's what they were: scammers - they were non-smokers who have found a way to get a drink and not pay for it. In those places, unless you are a well known regular, you either pay as you go or must provide a credit card when you order - and that includes in many of the dining rooms.
17
posted on
07/01/2003 8:25:30 AM PDT
by
Gabz
(anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
To: HarryDunne
"I'm really sorry, Harry, but see on my license where it says I can refuse service to anyone, for any reason?
"Get out! And stay out!"
18
posted on
07/01/2003 8:25:50 AM PDT
by
metesky
("Let us go among them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, "The Searchers")
To: HarryDunne
If you chose to read more into my comment than what it said relative to my previous post to you, so be it.
19
posted on
07/01/2003 8:26:32 AM PDT
by
Gabz
(anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
To: Gabz
Oh, ok. I must have misunderstood. Please explain what you meant.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson