To: Flurry
but don't go to Delaware.
Like the Florida Ban, the enforcement of the Delaware ban is driven by customer complaints. Legislation to change who got fined for violations was defeated in the Senate yesterday, because the governor threatened to veto it.
Currently the establishment gets fined, the proposal would have given the fine to the smoker.
7 posted on
07/01/2003 7:57:18 AM PDT by
Gabz
(anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
To: Gabz
Whut a crock of poop. Pass a law against private business then expect them to enforce it. Smoke Storm Troopers need to be hired to monitor each banned building and be paid for by the business man. SARCASM
8 posted on
07/01/2003 8:00:40 AM PDT by
Conspiracy Guy
(Read Buddy's, (the labrador retriever), new book about the Clintons, "Living Hell")
To: Gabz
Wouldn't it be wise of the bar owner and smoking customers to start ferreting out the rats?
This method of course does not allow for a smoker who has some secret grudge against the owner or another customer.
14 posted on
07/01/2003 8:17:20 AM PDT by
metesky
("Let us go among them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, "The Searchers")
To: Gabz
Like the Florida Ban, the enforcement of the Delaware ban is driven by customer complaints. I kind of like this.
Let me see if I have this right.
If a weenie boy shows up and calls the cops, can a half dozen people call the cops with his name and car license plate so they can pull him over and cite him for "smoking"?
Will a "nicotine" test be required?
With pay phone in bars I see endless possibilities.
He he he.
36 posted on
07/01/2003 9:24:48 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(Californians are as dumm as a sack of rocks)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson