Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade
You didn't see a problem with the law in that it was legal for a man and woman to do it but wrong for two men?

No problem at all. Nothing a man and woman could possibly do is morally equivalent to any sex act between two people of the same sex. God never placed any retrictions on sexual acts between man and wife, but he absolutely forbids any kind of homosexual act. If TX law forbade any sex act between man and wife, it was a bad law and should have been repealed. Personally, I believe heterosexual anal intercourse is depraved and demeaning, especially to the female, but it shouldn't be made illegal.

BTW, sodomy is a general term to describe homosexual acts of all kinds. The notion that it only means anal intercourse is simply wrong. The word is derived from Sodom, as in Sodom and Gommarah, and nowhere in the bible is the homosexual sin of the Sodomites specified as being any one particular act. Sodomy is just the practice of homosexual sex in any form.

119 posted on 06/29/2003 2:58:06 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: epow
"Nothing a man and woman could possibly do is morally equivalent to any sex act between two people of the same sex."

To define the act itself and declare it valid between man and woman and then declare it invalid between man and man is inequitable...
153 posted on 06/29/2003 4:22:07 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson