"Nothing a man and woman could possibly do is morally equivalent to any sex act between two people of the same sex."
To define the act itself and declare it valid between man and woman and then declare it invalid between man and man is inequitable...
To define the act itself and declare it valid between man and woman and then declare it invalid between man and man is inequitable...So you see nothing immoral or wrong about a man performing a sex act with another man? After reading some of your previous posts, I can see you don't.
There's no use trying to reason with someone who's moral compass is that far out of kilter.