Replies

That being said, if her arrogant ego and love of herself could be toned down a bit, I would find Coulter more respectable.

But this is why I respect her. I love someone who has a healthy self esteem. Toning down in this day and age usually means dumbing down. Arrogant usually means you have the facts to back up an opinion.

If arrogance is a sign that you have the facts to back it up, Congress must be the most factual place on earth. The DNC must be the repository for all known assembled information.

My point is that if you want to be the platinum blonde, loud mouthed, arrogant definition of vanity........, that may sell plenty of books, get you on talk shows, and get a bunch of lonely wankers worshiping you but it does not further the cause or bring people to your side.

Being right and factual does not automatically make you an effective communicator. It just makes you a good read to people who are already sold on your technique and background.

The question is Ms.Coulter, Just who do you want to be in twenty years? A smart author or a real force of change? Let's see what she brings to the show? My bet is that who she is is more important to her than the mark she could leave on the terra-firma. Talent wasted.

Hannity, Coulter, Shep Smith, Brian (fox dude), and the like need some fefinement and maturity. Linda Vester for one example of a classy smart lady.

If I want to see hot babes who present well with facts I can watch the weather channel.

If Coulter were married to the president of this country I bet she'd make Hillary's stint as first lady look like a pussy cat. Coulter would throw more than ash trays, lamps, and stares.