Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chancellor Palpatine; Grando Calrissian; discostu; MineralMan
PING Check out this lively debate!
133 posted on 06/26/2003 7:44:31 AM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LanPB01
If they're sited on the 14th ammendmant it's clean. The problem with the Texas law was that it specifically target homsexuals performing sodomy, wasn't just a universal sodomy law, straights could cornhole each other and gays couldn't. A clear violation of equal protection. This shouldn't have any effect on sodomy laws that cover gays and straights.
211 posted on 06/26/2003 8:09:33 AM PDT by discostu (you've got to bleed for the dancer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: LanPB01
You kidding? I wouldn't have missed it for all the tea in China.
326 posted on 06/26/2003 8:42:24 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (road trip.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: LanPB01
Smithers - I think women and sea-men don't mix.
Mr. Burns - We know what you think!
665 posted on 06/26/2003 10:25:01 AM PDT by Grando Calrissian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson