Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scripter
Y'know, I don't doubt Clinton was capable of it, but Broaddrick, by lying in her affadavit, made herself as much a perjurer as Clinton did, and therefore, suspect in her accusations, sorry.
2 posted on 06/25/2003 10:38:56 PM PDT by BritExPatInFla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BritExPatInFla
by lying in her affadavit, made herself as much a perjurer as Clinton did, and therefore, suspect in her accusations, sorry.

I like to look at a total picture and context to make my evaluations, and therefore your assertion that Broaddrick's false affidavit makes her as much of a perjurer as Clinton falls, in my book.

After all, she has corrected the record, and multiple witnesses and circumstantial evidence support her story. Plus, there is the ability to observe her when she relates her story and evaluate truthfulness. It helps that witnesses, this friend being just one, corroborate Juanita Broaddrick.

3 posted on 06/25/2003 10:44:23 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
Y'know, I don't doubt Clinton was capable of it,

Plus, there are other women who were sexually assaulted...

4 posted on 06/25/2003 10:46:26 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
Almost every person around Bill Clinton chooses to lie or is pressured to lie - at least until they get far enough away from the creep that they feel free to talk.

By not going public, Juanita was just stayin' alive. In her recent Hannity TV interview, Broaddrick remembered thinking that after Clinton left her hotel room the next person to enter would be someone to "get rid of the body."

The fact that Juanita told five close friends about being raped by Clinton very soon after the attack bolsters her credibility.

I wish Juanita had owned a gun and had it with her that day to use in self-defense. If Clinton had forced her to use it, Juanita wouldn't have been raped and America might've been spared its most corrupt and evil president of all-time.
11 posted on 06/25/2003 11:07:14 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
Y'know, I don't doubt Clinton was capable of it, but Broaddrick, by lying in her affadavit, made herself as much a perjurer as Clinton did, and therefore, suspect in her accusations, sorry.

It's not as simple as that.

The other "Jane Does" in the Paula Jones civil lawsuit were being followed, threatened, harrassed, bribed, wiretapped, and subjected to other abuses. The Clinton team would certainly have stopped at nothing to destroy her if she had given a full account of her assault in the Jones affidavit - and she filed that false statement to protect herself from Clinton's abuses of power. It wasn't right, but it was understandable.

But when the FBI interviewed her for the independent counsel's criminal investigation of the Clinton administration, she could not continue the cover story. Eventually she realized it was safer to talk about it publicly.

That affidavit was the only untrue statement she made during the ordeal. One untrue statement - compared to the countless lies Bill Clinton has told. Any reasonably objective person comparing her record for truthfulness against Clinton's must conclude that she is telling the truth about what happened in the Camelot Hotel that night.

13 posted on 06/25/2003 11:08:33 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
She was told that by signing the affidavit she would never have to testify and be cross-examined. Juanita did not want to relive the nightmare. To compare to Clinton's behavior her desire to keep this awful event hidden from public view is disgusting. Shame on you.
14 posted on 06/25/2003 11:13:27 PM PDT by doug from upland (Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
Hello.
17 posted on 06/25/2003 11:15:29 PM PDT by fatima (Few words,more action.I freeped Hillary and it felt good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
The Clintons' M.O. is always about the absuse of the police powers of the state colored by heavy handed use of their secert police, aka law firms' P.I.s, protected by att'y work product rules.

If you were raped or just sexually assaulted 20+ years ago by an A.G. or governor with a followup visit by heavies explaining costs of speaking up, you would fear for your wellbeing, until the actual Clintons' record has come to light.

Bill and Hillary are just bullies out of office. In office and with their defacto control of the DNC Politburo hundreds of million$, they are dangerous to their enemies.

If Gore were president, do you think that all this would have made it to the light of day? Granted Bill and Hillary were given cover ups by the feds, to the shame of lawful law enforcement. GW should have tried to indict them in Virginia.

There are still some 20 women who are in some form of seclusion since Bill and Hillary's strong arms explained the rules of the road.

I always favor menfolk of ladies so insulted to whup ass and knee caps of even less than rapists at first assault so he never repeats without recalling that he has already completed his intro course on biofeedback.

If rapist A.G. Bill had been called out 2x4 first, he would have peed himself red crying and quivering calling for Momma. Only then when he thought it safe, if TV lights were ever off, called in his Arkancides, but forever looking over his shoulder hoping non-surgical castration neuopathies could heal and that family raped and murdered was small. He would never had made it to 60 Minutes and Chelsea might never have found out who her daddy was.
21 posted on 06/25/2003 11:33:21 PM PDT by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
Hello,"Blindsided by whom? Disney has nothing to do with Gay Days and actually goes out of their way to 'warn' people that it is going on by placing signs at the entry to the parks that the event is taking place, but that is not sponsored nor endorsed by Disney. Honestly, the event is not an orgy of same sex public displays of affection, sure, there is hand holding, but you see little else. Face it, you're kids are gonna realize that there are gays and lesbians in the world sooner or later, and you won't be able to sheild them from that fact forever, the only thing you can do is teach them your feelings on the matter, whatever they may be."
23 posted on 06/25/2003 11:36:42 PM PDT by fatima (Few words,more action.I freeped Hillary and it felt good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
Y'know, I don't doubt Clinton was capable of it, but Broaddrick, by lying in her affadavit, made herself as much a perjurer as Clinton did, and therefore, suspect in her accusations, sorry.

This is the same charge that all the Clintonite flying monkeys use when they come here.

An analysis of your "logic" shows this: any corrupt law enforcement official only need use the law to force his victims to also commit "crimes". After that, their testimony against the corrupt official can be thrown out.

You're gullible.

42 posted on 06/26/2003 8:16:04 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
"...by lying in her affadavit..."

Don't you remember the line Monica L. said about revealing anything about the Clintons? Paraphrasing: "You don't know these people. I have to be very careful."

Until you've been personally threatened (or the hint of a threat made to you), you can't really understand what you'll sign or what you'll do.
47 posted on 06/26/2003 9:45:47 AM PDT by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BritExPatInFla
So the victim is to blame. Obviously, you have never been raped by a powerful person who could squash you like a bug. Shame on you for being so pious. You know nothing about the dangerous game of politics, do you?
54 posted on 06/30/2003 3:05:04 AM PDT by democratsstealvotes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson