Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is 'Wrongful Birth' Malpractice? (slimy lawyers wanna sue more)
CBS News ^ | 6.20.03

Posted on 06/24/2003 7:34:16 PM PDT by mhking

(CBS) Eight-year-old Jade Fields has just come home from a school for disabled children. Her parents, Willy and Cynthia, are there to meet her.

Jade is severely retarded, can't walk, and can only say a few words. She’s also legally blind, fed through a tube in her stomach and often has to be hospitalized.

The Fields take care of her with help from Sharday, their 17-year-old son.

“I really did not know how much work it really was, you know. It's so much work,” says mother Cynthia Fields.

But nine years ago, when Cynthia first saw Jade on a sonogram, it was one of the happiest days of her life.

“I was just so overwhelmed with joy. I'm going to have a little girl, a little girl my husband always wanted, and, oh, it just brings chills to me,” says Cynthia.

Willy Fields, a sanitation worker, rushes home to spend time with Jade every day after work.

“I can't wait to get home to see her, to see her smiling and I know she's not the healthiest girl in the world, but, you know, what she feels I feel, 'cause she's my heart,” says Willy. “That's all I can say; she's my heart.”

But in 1999, the Fields filed a "wrongful birth" lawsuit against their obstetrician, claiming he should have detected Jade's condition and told them about it. Correspondent Ed Bradley contentious issue of “wrongful-birth” lawsuits.

“Jade is the best thing that could have ever happened to us, I mean she's our foundation, she's our rock. But if we had known, I didn't have an option,” says Cynthia, who would have had an abortion if she knew about Jade’s condition.

“When looking at this child, first question is, why wasn't anything picked up on the sonogram,” says Rachelle Harz, the malpractice lawyer who took the Fields' case. Harz won nearly $1.7 million dollars for the Fields when they settled their wrongful birth case out of court.

Since the doctor hadn't saved any of his sonogram pictures, the main piece of evidence in their wrongful birth suit was the hospital discharge record, which described Jade's health at the time she was born.

“And on physical examination it specifically says "neck folds" and it says an ultrasound showed a "right choroid plexus cyst," says Harz, who believes that both of these conditions should have been seen on a second trimester sonogram.

“Those two things in and of themselves would have required further investigation into the condition of this fetus, and nothing was done,” says Harz.

In his defense, the doctor said that to clarify the health of the fetus, he offered Cynthia Fields an amniocentesis, an offer she says he never made. The doctor declined 60 Minutes’ request for an interview, but told a reporter for a local paper that he didn't cause Jade's retardation -- God did.

“He didn't cause the child's retardation, what he caused was not giving the proper information to the parents to allow them the choice to abort the child,” argues Harz. “He caused the birth of this very, very neurologically impaired child. He did not cause the child to have that injury.”

In 1973 the Supreme Court upheld a woman's legal right to an abortion, and that opened the door to the first successful wrongful birth lawsuit a few years later.

But wrongful birth suits are not accepted everywhere. Right now, only twenty eight states recognize them, and nine states prohibit them outright. And most of these cases are settled out of court.

“When your client is offered a certain amount of money that's going to change their life, what more is it that you think you can do for your client,” says Harz.

Wrongful birth suits often settle out of court for less money than a jury might award because insurance companies don't want a child like Jade brought before a jury. Plus, sonograms don't always make the most convincing evidence at trial.

Even the best obstetricians can have a difficult time reading them. Dr. Jim Shwayder is the Director of Ultrasound Medicine at the Denver Health Medical Center.

Dr. Shwayder showed 60 Minutes a tape of an ultrasound where he thought he had seen an abnormality like the one Jade Fields had. He believed this child might also be born retarded.

“We actually labeled this as a possible abnormality. Well, this is in fact a baby that has a great deal of hair, and when it was delivered the baby was perfectly normal,” says Shwayder. “What we were witnessing here was really hair that was free-floating in the fluid, creating what appeared to be a possible abnormality.”

Dr. Shwayder has testified as an expert witness in many wrongful birth cases for both doctors and patients, so 60 Minutes asked him to examine the evidence in Jade Fields case.

“One of the things that's discussed here for instance is a slightly thickened neck fold. That's become a marker for Downs Syndrome,” says Shwayder. “But we also know that only represents about 45 percent sensitivity in detecting a Downs Syndrome baby. That means that over half those babies that have a thickened neck fold so not have Downs Syndrome.”

According to Shwayder, the evidence indicates that there needs to a be heightened awareness to her case, but the document is not proof of malpractice.

Are these suits driving good doctors out of the profession?

“I think they are. I think what's happened is physicians now are held to a level that perhaps many people could not see in their own life, they're basically held to perfection,” says Shwayder.

And that standard, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, is a major problem for doctors. They currently list twelve states where malpractice suits have caused insurance premiums to increase so much that they threaten to drive obstetricians out of business.

One of those states is New Jersey where, last June, over a thousand doctors and their supporters rallied at the state house, calling for tort reform and a cap on malpractice lawsuits.

Does Harz, as a malpractice lawyer, feel any responsibility for driving good doctors out of business?

“If you want to get rid of malpractice premiums, wouldn't it be better to get rid of the malpractice,” says Harz.

“If there wasn't to be a medical malpractice case, where's this victim supposed to turn? Who's going to be policing the doctors then?”

It's estimated that thousands of wrongful birth lawsuits have been filed since 1973, and there are no restrictions on the birth defect for which parents can sue.

The disabled child that parents claim would have been "better off dead" might be severely retarded, like Jade Fields, or might be like 9-year-old Ryan Powers, who is also one of Harz's clients. After his parents won an out of court settlement, his story was profiled in “The Record," a New Jersey newspaper.

Ryan was born with spina bifida, and is paralyzed from the waist down. But mentally, he's normal. He’s mainstreamed in a Catholic school, and on his last report card, his mother Karen told us he got straight A's. She didn't want to talk on camera about the wrongful birth lawsuit she brought against her doctor, saying she wanted "to put all that behind us."

But in these cases, you have to ask yourself, is this the kind of child that would have been better off not being here?

“Are you saying that someone should come up with a criteria as to what injuries are okay and what injuries aren't okay to be determined prenatally for abortion,” asks Harz. “Who are we to make these judgments?”

“It seems as though we're questioning not only the value of life, but the value of people who are not perfect,” says Anita Allen-Castellito, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania and a bio-ethicist.

Castellito worries that Ryan will be damaged emotionally if he learns that his mother testified that she would have had an abortion if she had known about his condition.

“Realistically how many children are going to hear that complicated story as opposed to the simpler message that ‘I didn't want you, you're disabled, I didn't want a disabled child,’” says Castellito.

“I know that it's not true that spina bifida causes people to have miserable lives,” says Marsha Saxton, who was born with spina bifida and now works with disabled children as a researcher at the World Institute on Disability.

“Wrongful birth suits give children and adults with disabilities the message that our very existence was a tragic mistake,” says Saxton at a disability conference.

“The message is that these children’s' lives are so miserable and such a burden to the family that the only compensation would be millions of dollars. And this is such a distortion, of what these children’s' lives are like.”

In fact, Saxton says that children with spina bifida, or with Downs Syndrome, two of the more common causes of wrongful birth suits, can and do live perfectly happy lives. But she understands why parents would bring a wrongful birth lawsuit.

“It's a vulnerable time for parents, and they're trying to figure out how best to care for this child with different kinds of needs than they had anticipated, and somebody comes along, maybe it's somebody from the medical system or a relative, or a neighbor who says ‘You could make some money here,’" says Saxton.

And money can solve a lot of problems for the family of a disabled child. With their portion of the settlement money, around $1.2 million dollars, the Fields family bought a van with a wheelchair lift and plan to finally get some outside help to take care of Jade.

“With this settlement or whatever, we'll see what it feels like to have nursing,” says Jade’s mother, Cynthia.

“When you can recover for a family such as this so that the parents know that when I can't take care of him anymore, he'll be able to take care of himself, do you know what I have done for those parents,” asks Harz. “They know when they go to sleep, someone will take care of their child.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2003 7:34:16 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
"Hold muh beer 'n watch this!" PING....

If you want on or off this list, please let me know!

2 posted on 06/24/2003 7:34:34 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Can we, as a society, sue Mr. and Mrs. Hartz for the wrongful birth of future lawyer Rachelle Harz?
3 posted on 06/24/2003 7:41:24 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
It is poverty when a child must die so that you may live as you wish- Mother Theresa
4 posted on 06/24/2003 7:44:05 PM PDT by Bogey78O (check it out... http://freepers.zill.net/users/bogey78o_fr/puppet.swf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
The concept of "wrongful birth" is nihilistic, and is it also philosophically incoherent:

1 - To be WRONGED is to be HARMED.

2 - The concept of HARM depends upon the antecedent concept of LIFE, because it is only a living being that can be harmed; HARM is an injury to LIFE.

3 - But here, the plaintiff wold have to claim that his very LIFE is a HARM, a contradiction, and also an evil idea.
5 posted on 06/24/2003 7:54:14 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
The concept of "wrongful birth" is nihilistic, and is it also philosophically incoherent:

1 - To be WRONGED is to be HARMED.

2 - The concept of HARM depends upon the antecedent concept of LIFE, because it is only a living being that can be harmed; HARM is an injury to LIFE.

3 - But here, the plaintiff wold have to claim that his very LIFE is a HARM, a contradiction, and also an evil idea.

6 posted on 06/24/2003 7:54:45 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
Whoops.
7 posted on 06/24/2003 7:55:25 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Wonder how long it will be before parents are compelled by the state to abort possible imperfect pre-born babies to reduce medical expenses? Or, forced to have their child euthanized later if found defective? Tobacco yesterday, fast food today, undesirables tomorrow?
8 posted on 06/24/2003 7:59:15 PM PDT by bluesagewoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluesagewoman
Left wingers like Peter Singer (who also came up with the absurd concept of 'animal-rights') have been advocating this for years.
9 posted on 06/24/2003 8:25:12 PM PDT by Guillermo (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bluesagewoman
Absolutely, that's what socialism is all about. When the government pays the bills, they call the shots. Forced abortion is well entrenched in China, for example.
10 posted on 06/24/2003 8:33:37 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mhking
That is disgusting!
11 posted on 06/24/2003 8:51:53 PM PDT by Calpernia (Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Trust me, you don't want to see this post.
12 posted on 06/24/2003 8:54:43 PM PDT by Calpernia (Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mhking
There are days when I wish I had never been born, Who can I sue?
13 posted on 06/24/2003 9:05:10 PM PDT by fifteendogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Bradley, of course, did not ask how much of the $1.6MM actually got to the "aggrieved" family - the lawyer admitted that they got about $1.2 - but actually, they must pay tax on the whole $1.6MM(figure another $500k) and so they "netted" around $700k - that is why the Feds are not as interested in tort reform as they might want people to think - the lawyer makes around 25 to 40 percent depending if there is a trial - the Feds make a cut of around 40% of the gross off the plaintiff and another 30+% off the lawyer's cut - so the big winner is the Feds, then the lawyers, then the so-called victim - lastly, the consumer must pay more for his medical treatments to off-set the premiums the doctors must pay - interesting system.
14 posted on 06/24/2003 9:24:07 PM PDT by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Cynthia, who would have had an abortion if she knew about Jade’s condition

Heck, you know about it NOW, Cynthia... Why not just drag her out back and beat her to death with a shovel?

15 posted on 06/24/2003 9:27:12 PM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
I watch this story on Sixty Minutes Sunday evening. It brings tears to my eyes to see how far down the funneled slippery slope my nation has slid in my lifetime. Cannibalism is now raising its demonic head, of course in the name of enlightened medical advancement. Lousiana and New Jersey, so far, have embraced it, allowing designer embryos for dissection and harvesting of stem cells. That we can do somethin in science doesn't mean we should do it. Well, it used to be that way. Now, the amorality of science has taken over our society as the handmaid of secular humanism. I won't live long enough to see the evil fruits of these newest dehumanizations, but I fear my granddaughter will be immersed in the sludge.
16 posted on 06/24/2003 9:29:21 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...

Please let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

17 posted on 06/24/2003 9:52:09 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (“My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge.” Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mhking
That's why OBGYNs are forced to pay $110,000 a year for malpractice insurance.
18 posted on 06/24/2003 9:59:31 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Maybe the handicapped child should sue the parents for "wrongful conception", on the grounds that parents who cannot accept their child as he or she is, should not conceive any children.
19 posted on 06/24/2003 10:01:07 PM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluesagewoman
Not long. I read a news article today where Belgium is planning to extend their euthanasia campaign to those under the age of 17.
20 posted on 06/24/2003 10:01:41 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson