One More Month to Block Rejoining UNESCO!

Status: Congress is now expected to consider H.R. 1950, the bill that would reestablish U.S. membership in UNESCO, in mid-July. If you have not contacted your representative and senators, please do so now. And, in the remaining month please continue to convince others to contact their representatives in Congress about this issue.

Recommendation: Contact your representative by email, phone, or fax and ask him to introduce or support an amendment to H.R. 1950 (Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005) that would block the U.S. from rejoining UNESCO. Base your opposition to UNESCO on its clear intent to be a global school board with a subversive agenda to prepare our children for world government. For example, the Earth Charter crusade to paganize our children is currently one of UNESCO's major projects.

Send a copy of your correspondence to your senators and urge them to oppose any legislation to rejoin UNESCO.

Be sure to ask your friends and others who are concerned about UNESCO's Earth Charter crusade to contact their congressmen. This is yet another uphill fight that will require all the support we can muster.

Status: In 1984, the U.S. withdrew from UNESCO because, according to Gregory Newell, then-Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations, it had "extraneously politicized virtually every subject it deals with. It has exhibited hostility toward a free society, especially a free market and a free press...." However, on September 12, 2002, President Bush said at the United Nations: "[T]he United States will return to UNESCO. This organization has been reformed and America will participate fully in its mission to advance human rights, tolerance, and learning." Contrary to what President Bush has said, UNESCO has not reformed. For more information on this, read "The Global School Board," and "UNESCO's Rotten Track Record," by William F. Jasper in The New American, May 19, 2003.

Although the fiscal 2002-03 State Department authorization (PL 107-228) enacted last year paved the way for the United States to rejoin UNESCO, Congress still has the power to keep the U.S. out of UNESCO.

On May 5th Rep. Hyde (R-Ill.) introduced H.R. 1950 (Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005) which states the sense of Congress that the U.S. will be resuming membership in UNESCO and which would authorize U.S. dues payments to UNESCO for fiscal years 2004 and 2005. When the House Committee on International Relations considered H.R. 1950 on May 8th, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) introduced an amendment to block U.S. dues payments to UNESCO. Paul's amendment was rejected by a vote of 14 to 26. Then, the committee voted 42 to 3 to send H.R. 1950 to the House floor where action on the bill is expected sometime in mid-July.

Reentry by the U.S. into UNESCO membership can still be blocked by amendment of H.R. 1950 on the House floor.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter I
NIXON DECREES U.S. COMPOSED OF TEN FEDERAL REGIONS
Flagrant Violation of the U.S. Constitution

Chapter II
METRO-REGIONAL GOVERNMENT: WHAT IS IT?
Taxation Without Representation

Chapter III
PEOPLE CONTROL VIA EXECUTIVE ORDERS
Nixon Endorses Kennedy’s Dangerous Executive Orders
Role of Federal Regional Councils in Implementing Executive Orders

Chapter IV
NIXON RESTRUCTURES EXECUTIVE BRANCH TO ADMINISTER METRO
Office of Management and Budget - Overseer of Federal Regional Council

Chapter V
THE ROLE OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (CFR) IN METRO
C.F.R. Man in Charge of Carrying out Nixon’s Executive Orders

Chapter VI
THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (CED) AND METRO
C.F.R. Members on C.E.D.’S Research and Policy Committee
C.E.D. Proposals to "Modernize" Local Government
Abolishing Most Elective Offices at the Local Level
Abolishing Most Elective Offices at the State Level
C.E.D. Pushes Metro
"Professionals" to Replace Elected Officials

Chapter VII
"1313" - REGIONAL GOVERNMENT’S TROJAN HORSE
Mail-Order State Constitutions and Laws from "1313"

Chapter VIII
HOW METRO OPERATES AT THE LOCAL AND STATE LEVEL
List of City-County Consolidations Since 1957
Regional Councils - "1313’s" Apparatus at the Local Level

Chapter IX
"REVENUE SHARING" BRINGS INCREASED FEDERAL CONTROL
Present Federal-Grant Programs Will Not be Abolished
Better Communities Act - Newest Version of Revenue Sharing

Chapter X
TIE-IN BETWEEN "REVENUE SHARING" AND METRO-REGIONAL GOVERNMENT

Chapter XI
METRO AND URBAN RENEWAL
Urban Renewal - Vehicle for Seizing Private Property
Federal Metro Forces City-Suburbs Merger

Chapter XII
WHY METRO PROMOTES LAND-USE LAWS
"1313" Backs Land-Use Legislation
"Land-Use" - Vehicle for Regional Government

Chapter XIII
FEDERAL FUNDING FOR METRO-REGIONAL GOVERNMENT VIA LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION (LEAA)
Ten Federal Regional Councils Readying Plans to Rule the 50 States

Chapter XIV
HOW TO IDENTIFY A METRO OPERATION

Chapter XV
WHAT YOU CAN DO

http://www.sweetliberty.org/beware_metro.html

NIXON’S EXECUTIVE ORDER SUB-DIVIDING THE STATES

On February 10, 1972, as the nation’s press and TV were inundating the American people with coverage of Nixon’s upcoming journey to Communist China, the President signed Executive Order No. 11647, which then appeared in the FEDERAL REGISTER of February 12. There was virtually no comment in the nation’s press on this action.

By this Executive Order, the President by a stroke of the pen divided the United States into ten federal regions to be run by "Federal Regional Councils."

In Executive Order No. 11647, the President decreed:

"There is hereby established a Federal Regional Council for each of the ten standard federal regions. Each Council shall be composed of the directors of the regional offices of the Departments of Labor, Health, Education, and Welfare, and Housing and Urban Development, the Secretarial Representative of the Department of Transportation, and the directors of the regional offices of the Office of Economic Opportunity, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.

" The President shall designate one member of each such council as chairman of that council and such chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the President. Representatives of the Office of Management and Budget may participate in any deliberations of each council."

The "ten standard federal regions" referred to by Nixon were delineated by him in a press release issued by the White House on May 21, 1969. Purporting to "streamline the structure and processes of federal agencies in the field," the President then gave the alignment for the federal regions as follows: (The city in parentheses is the federal capital of each region.)

REGION I (Boston) - Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

REGION II (New York City) - New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

REGION III (Philadelphia) -Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia.

REGION IV (Atlanta) -Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.

REGION V (Chicago) -Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

REGION VI (Dallas-Fort Worth) Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.

REGION VII (Kansas City) - Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.

REGION VIII (Denver) - Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.

REGION IX (San Francisco) -Arizona, California, Hawaii, and Nevada.

REGION X (Seattle) - Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

As can be noted in the foregoing list, in all cases the lines drawn for these federal regions cross State lines, thus to all intents and purposes obliterating the sovereignty of the States.

FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution declares:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government..."

A republican form of government is defined in Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary as one in which "the sovereign power resides in a certain body of the people - the electorate - and is exercised by representatives elected by, and responsible to, them."

Under the Federal Regional Councils proclaimed by President Nixon, government in the ten federal regions would be administered by federal appointed bureaucrats accountable only to Washington, D.C.

Thus Nixon’s actions are a clear violation of the U.S. Constitution, according to Article IV, Section 4.

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1, of the U.S. Constitution stipulates:

"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other State, nor any State be formed by the junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress."

Thus, Nixon’s unilateral establishment of the ten federal regions violates this Clause in the U.S. Constitution inasmuch as, prior to the issuance of this edict, the President did not obtain the consent of all the State Legislatures concerned, nor of Congress.

What is behind this ominous consolidation of Federal power over the States and the citizens thereof ?

What is its ultimate purpose? And how far has it progressed?

How will it affect you, your pocketbook and your future liberty?

To answer these, and other questions on this grave threat to Constitutional government in the United States, is the purpose of this book.

http://www.sweetliberty.org/beware_metro.html

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.