To: CyberCowboy777
I didn't claim that he is lying but I don't necessarily believe him either. But I'm sure you would believe him simply because what he says helps your distorted little cause.
To: ConstitutionLover
I didn't claim that he is lying but I don't necessarily believe him either. But I'm sure you would believe him simply because what he says helps your distorted little cause. So you have no fact, you just don't believe him. Simply because doing so helps your distorted little cause?
By what standard do you accuse me of believing lies (that you cannot prove are lies) just to push my agenda? You are the one accusing him of lying without proof. At least what I think happened is accounted, your just making stuff up.
387 posted on
06/18/2003 11:59:22 AM PDT by
CyberCowboy777
(They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.)
To: ConstitutionLover
I didn't claim that he is lying 2. You would believe a statement made by a nutcase like that.
378 posted on 06/18/2003 10:55 AM PDT by ConstitutionLover
I think you are pretty much calling him a liar. Make up your mind.
389 posted on
06/18/2003 12:02:04 PM PDT by
CyberCowboy777
(They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson