I was very surprised to not read mention of them in the article. This is their kind of case. Why are they NOT involved?
I was very surprised to not read mention of them in the article. This is their kind of case. Why are they NOT involved?
Addressed in the thread a few posts up.
I am not sure on the technicalities. One poster said that HSLDA would not tale the case, because they knowingly broke the law. Another poster said the law had ab "opt out" for testing.
And, if they are not dues paying members, HSLDA may not consider the case worthy of engaging.