Skip to comments.
AOL Liberal Bias
AOL
| 6/11/03
| Outraged
Posted on 06/11/2003 12:38:19 AM PDT by Outraged
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-133 last
To: Jeff Chandler
I agree and disagree.
Obviously, you know more about the technical aspects of their software.
However, if you have a dial-up connection it makes sense to have AOL.
I haven't used AOL's browser in years, even when I had to dial-up.
Now that I have DSL, the AOL account is like a long-held phone number/back-up when DSL is down.
It works.
As for AOL people not knowing how the internet works?
Um, to be sure a lot don't because they're NEW to the game.
As I stated, I was doing HTML nearly a decade ago, and until the high-speed era, AOL was fine(except for that short time they took on more subscribers than they had bandwidth for)
Now, it's just a backup. I also have a bias against NetZero because what WAS free is no longer(not that I expected any different, but don't shove commie-glorifying commercials down my throat on football sundays either)
most broadband connections are NOT 9.95, so if a person can get AOL broadband or Verizon, go for it. Either would be better than
Excite@Home, which is what we had prior to Interquest.
121
posted on
06/11/2003 10:03:55 PM PDT
by
Skywalk
To: Outraged
My favorite Earthlink radio commercial made fun of "Keywords" and other AOL silliness and then asked "Isn't it time you took off the training wheels?"
122
posted on
06/11/2003 10:35:15 PM PDT
by
EricT.
To: Skywalk
I never liked NetZero. My brother had it and could never get in.
I have Qwest VDSL, which is reasonably fast downloading, and smoking fast uploading. It's perfect for me because I upload a lot of files. Their reliability is great, too, which is odd because they have a terrible reputation for their dial-up service.
When I had dial-up I used a local ISP--cheap and reliable. I admit I am biased against AOL, but I have my reasons. I am not a technician, so I try to stay away from programs which tie up my time with glitches (Microsoft is bad enough!)
123
posted on
06/11/2003 11:22:49 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been banned.)
To: EricT.
>>"Isn't it time you took off the training wheels?"<<
That's where I got that! I remember now.
124
posted on
06/11/2003 11:23:51 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been banned.)
To: Outraged
Do you have to have AOL as your homepage if it's your ISP? I prefer mindspring.com (earthlink) for many reasons not the least of which is that it works with Outlook email and it's not web-based. Lose AOL.
To: wardaddy
"Maybe dial-ups like them....??"
Thanks for the grin.
126
posted on
06/12/2003 12:57:45 AM PDT
by
Cindy
To: Jeff Chandler
re post no. 6..."In describing the ease with which one can learn HTML, I like to use the example "even some AOL customers have learned how to write it!""
Well said, Jeff.
127
posted on
06/12/2003 1:02:18 AM PDT
by
Cindy
Comment #128 Removed by Moderator
To: Miss Marple
I'm with you Miss Marple. I've had AOL for years, I might leave one of these days, but for now I'm keeping it. I also have an external ISP and I'm intelligent enough to know how to populate my AIM list and my Buddy List.
It's easy enough to demonize AOL or anything else for that matter, a no brainer. There are Communities on AOL that I enjoy, just as I enjoy Free Republic.
Nuff said.
Jen
129
posted on
06/12/2003 6:20:20 AM PDT
by
IVote2
To: Hank Rearden
If I have to answer one more "how do I turn on FreeRepublic?" type question again, I'm going to pop. And you think that is a problem here? A bit counterintuitive, don't you think?
Is it not FreeRepublic that we are posting on here but where you have mistakenly chosen to register your contempt of AOL users?
I think it is probably fair to say that one can be pretty certain that no one here on FR has sought your "help" in your noted example at all. Which is what makes your posting of distain for AOL users on THIS site to be all the more inappropriate.
To: Sonny M
He has a controlling interest, and has qute alotta pull when it comes to content.
Yes, he does 'own' it.
That's what that would be called.
131
posted on
06/13/2003 1:30:59 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Nox aeternus en pax.)
To: Commie Basher
He still has alotta pull and control over content.
132
posted on
06/13/2003 1:31:31 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Nox aeternus en pax.)
To: Darksheare
He has a controlling interest, and has qute alotta pull when it comes to content.If he had a controlling interest, he would have gotten what he wanted right now, which is for AOL Time Warner to split up. He has been denied several times for things he demanded. The most notable was when they sold his beloved wrestling organization to his publicly hated rival Vince McMahon, but not before embarrassing canceling the wrestling show on his own network TNT and TBS.
Since he has sold of a most of his shares, he is now attempting to buy back the atlanta braves, whom he did own, and now belongs to AOL Time Warner. If he "owned" AOL Time Warner, it would be mighty odd to try and buy assets that he "owns" from it.
He also had the indignity of having been denied when he demanded CNN hire a friend of his, and they refused. His relationship, with Dick Parsons, is at best warm, his relationship with Steve Case, horrid (he has threatened him on several occasions).
Owning shares in a company, and owning the company, are 2 different things, the fact that he could be fired or be able to resign shows that.
133
posted on
06/13/2003 4:52:19 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-133 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson