Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: prairiebreeze
I can't summon up much sympathy for her. From what I understand it is the covering up and not cooperating that is nipping at her heels.

Thing is, she was being pursued for something ("insider trading") that is not wrong, and that is based in terrible law. Anyone who values liberty, capitalism and the free market SHOULD have sympathy for her.

38 posted on 06/04/2003 5:19:07 PM PDT by wizzler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: wizzler
Anyone who values liberty, capitalism and the free market SHOULD have sympathy for her.

Wiz, insider trading is antithetical to all of the above.

46 posted on 06/04/2003 5:25:21 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: wizzler
the free market

The market isn't free if there is insider trading.

58 posted on 06/04/2003 5:37:40 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: wizzler
Anyone who values liberty, capitalism and the free market SHOULD have sympathy for her.

Or at least have sympathy for what this might do to others in the future as a result. The fact of the matter is that "insider trading" laws are just plain wrong. It allows the feds to stick their noses where they don't belong. Anyone who thinks these laws serve to help the free market doesn't understand the concept of a free market.

93 posted on 06/04/2003 6:27:44 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: wizzler
So, seeing as I am ignorant of the law to which you refer, you are saying that if all the posters here own stock in a company and 5 of us are on social terms with the CEO and board members, that it is just astute business for the 5 who are on the "in" to receive information about the stock's upward or downward movement that will net them an increase in capital and that the rest of us will just have to suck it up and deal with the results of being kept in the dark, for reasons of personal gain by the 5?

You never took the time to think this through, really. Or, you have been brainwashed and are beyond redemption.
127 posted on 06/04/2003 7:23:23 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts (I see the world and my surroundings in a new light and I still hate all things Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: wizzler
Thing is, she was being pursued for something ("insider trading") that is not wrong, and that is based in terrible law. Anyone who values liberty, capitalism and the free market SHOULD have sympathy for her.

How can you say it is NOT WRONG to steal from others?

When Martha makes a killing overnight with insider knowledge, SOMEONE ELSE looses money. Perhaps some soon-to-be retirees in their pension funds.

When Hillary miraculously turned $1000 into $100,000 on cattle futures, SOMEONE ELSE had their $100,000 instantly reduced to $1000.

If Hillary did anything illegal or unethical in that trade, she effectively STOLE $99,000 from a fellow citizen.

It's not quite as black and white with Martha, but she was STILL STEALING from others based on an uneven playing field.

172 posted on 06/04/2003 10:47:26 PM PDT by Doompieyashick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: wizzler
Thing is, she was being pursued for something ("insider trading") that is not wrong, and that is based in terrible law

BS. Insider trading is a corruption of the capital markets. It shouldn't be tolerated.
193 posted on 06/05/2003 11:09:42 AM PDT by Bush2000 (R>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson