To: Pro-Bush
... and the *whole* point of the last two *successful* 'wars' has been to head this sort of thing off - RIGHT???
26 posted on
06/02/2003 10:15:08 PM PDT by
_Jim
(http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
To: _Jim
... and the *whole* point of the last two *successful* 'wars' has been to head this sort of thing off - RIGHT???
Right....Has there been another terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11/01?
No there hasn't.
Did I miss your point or something?
41 posted on
06/02/2003 10:22:35 PM PDT by
Pro-Bush
To: _Jim
... and the *whole* point of the last two *successful* 'wars' has been to head this sort of thing off - RIGHT???Yes. And there have not been any successful attacks in the USA since 911. You seem to be blaming the victim for fighting back. They started this, we did not. If we had not gone into Afghanistan, the Al Qaeda terror machine would still be humming along on all four cylinders. It is now sputtering on 2 cylinders. Yes, they could still inflict harm, but they are not as organized and potent as they were. And that IS the SUCCESS that you seem to jeer. If we had not gone into Iraq, Al Qaeda would have been successful in getting Afghanistan-II off the ground. That we disrupted that is also a SUCCESS.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson