[thatsnotnice]

When was this report dated - - 9-10-2001?

There were at least two "whistle blowers" that submitted reports labelled as "routine" that warned of potential problems, pre-9/11.

Just goes to show that after the fact, everything is important, I guess.

[_Jim]

There were at least two "whistle blowers"

WTC 1993 ... Khobar Towers (sp?) ... USS Kohl (sp?) ... WTC 2001 ...

"Reports? We don't need no stinking reports to know there's a threat out there!"

[Pro-Bush]

When was this report dated - - 9-10-2001?

Not like Drudge to post old news...(unless a Freeper finds a story first)It is from a four-page report titled Terrorist CBRN: Materials and Effects...can't find it on Goggle, seems to be new. There is lots of other stuff regarding CBRN:

[McGavin999]

Sort of like the WMDs in Iraq. The democrats wanted proof before we did anything. You know, proof like a giant hole where New York City used to be, or a couple million people suffereing from smallpox in LA. Wonder why the democrats wanted us to pay attention and do something about unsubstantiated "chatter" before 9-11 and yet expect us to provide absolute proof of WMDs in Iraq?