Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laci's things in tug of war
The Modesto Bee ^ | May 31, 2003 | Garth Stapely and John Cote'

Posted on 05/31/2003 8:41:50 AM PDT by runningbear

Laci's things in tug of war


Laci Peterson's brother Brent Rocha loads a rocking chair from her Modesto home into the back of a truck Friday morning.

Laci's things in tug of war

By GARTH STAPLEY and JOHN COTÉ

BEE STAFF WRITERS

Published: May 31, 2003, 07:16:10 AM PDT

Laci Peterson's family and friends removed truckloads of items from the slain Modesto woman's house on Friday, touching off controversy between her family and that of her husband.

Police responded to the Covena Avenue home at about 10 a.m. after a security company reported that the alarm had been triggered, Capt. Greg Savelli said.

Officers determined that Laci Peterson's family and friends were removing items that belonged to Laci, said Savelli, who added that officers documented what was taken.

"We're treating this as a civil dispute over property," he said. "It was clear to the Police Department that this was not a burglary.

Peterson's husband, Scott, 30, has been charged with double murder and faces the death penalty in the killings of his 27-year-old wife and their unborn son, Conner.

Savelli said the fallout from Friday's property removal "was best handled between the families and their attorneys."

Adam Stewart, an attorney for Laci Peterson's family, said the family had been in contact with Scott Peterson's defense team, who had agreed to allow Laci's mother, Sharon Rocha, to go through the house on Tuesday. She was to be accompanied by representatives of the defense team, and all items taken were to be photographed and videotaped.

Scott Peterson's parents and lawyers expressed outrage that the Rochas did not follow the agreement.

Jackie Peterson said the people who went into the home Friday had "absolutely no permission to be in that house. I have a lot of empathy for Sharon, but she does not have a right to go in our house and take what she wants."

Rocha did not appear to be among the packers. Calls placed to the Rocha home were not accepted.

Seven vehicles loaded

Among the items loaded into seven vehicles were a crib, a rocking chair and a box with Graco printed on the outside. Graco makes such products as strollers, highchairs and car seats.

Laci Peterson's family announced Wednesday that it had hired attorneys to help recover items from the house. A list included her wedding dress, jewelry and Conner's crib.

Jackie Peterson told The Bee that the security company notified her by telephone in San Diego County that the house alarm had been tripped.

The property removal appeared to take Scott Peterson's defense team by surprise.

Matthew Dalton, an attorney with lead defense attorney Mark Geragos' law firm, drove to the house and asked reporters if someone had reported a burglary.

Dalton went to Stewart's Modesto law office Friday morning and dropped off some items requested by the Rocha family, Stewart said.

Monday, the defense team moved other items, including what appeared to be gifts, to the Modesto office of defense co-counsel Kirk McAllister, for transfer to Laci Peterson's family. But the items had not been picked up by Friday morning, McAllister said.

Stewart said in front of the home that it would be "ridiculous" to suggest that the Rochas broke into the home.

"I apologize for it coming down to this," he said. "This is not the way we operate. This is for Laci, for Conner and Laci's family. It is not for the media or Mr. Scott Peterson's defense in any way, shape or form. It's depressing that it's come down to this."

Stanislaus County Chief Deputy District Attorney John Goold said prosecutors had no legal authority over the house.

"It's not a crime scene," Goold said. " This is a civil problem between the Rochas and the Petersons."

The house title is in Laci and Scott Petersons' names, county records show. In such a joint tenancy, when one titleholder dies, the title goes to the other.

------------------------------------------------------------

Incident brings Peterson case close to home
Victim's family moves items from house, raising the issue of ownership.

Incident brings Peterson case close to home
Victim's family moves items from house, raising the issue of ownership.

By Garth Stapley and John Coté
The Modesto Bee

(Published Saturday, May 31, 2003, 4:47 AM)

MODESTO -- Laci Peterson's family and friends removed truckloads of items from the slain Modesto woman's house Friday, touching off controversy between her family and that of her husband.

Police officers were dispatched after a security company notified them that the alarm at the Covena Avenue home had been triggered, Capt. Greg Savelli said.

Officers determined that members of the Rocha family and friends of Laci Peterson were removing items that belonged to the slain woman and documented what was taken, Savelli said.

"We're treating this as a civil dispute over property," he said. "It was clear to the police department that this was not a burglary. It was a dispute over property and was best handled between the families and their attorneys."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judge cites Peterson right to fair trial in denying report access

Judge cites Peterson right to fair trial in denying report access

By JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITER

Published: May 31, 2003, 07:16:56 AM PDT

A Stanislaus County judge on Friday ordered that arrest and search warrants remain sealed in the case against Scott Peterson, who is accused of murdering his pregnant wife and unborn son.

Superior Court Judge Al Giro-lami's ruling also ordered the autopsy reports for Laci and Conner to stay sealed.

Thursday, District Attorney James Brazelton reversed his position and asked to have the autopsy reports made public, and the matter is set for hearing June 6.

Brazelton's about-face came after part of the fetus's autopsy report was leaked to the media. Prosecutors said that portion was clearly "skewed in favor of the defense."

Defense attorneys, coroner's officials, police and prosecutors have denied leaking the information.

Friday, in his ruling on all the documents, Girolami said releasing them "might irreparably harm the continued investigation into this criminal matter."

"Despite the fact that the complaint has been issued and a suspect has been arrested, the investigation and search for both incriminating and exonerating evidence in this matter continues," Girolami wrote.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys argued that releasing the documents could impede Peterson's right to a fair trial and damage an ongoing investigation.

Girolami agreed, saying in his ruling that releasing the documents "might result in the evidence being destroyed and witnesses being reluctant to step forward."

A group of newspapers, including The Bee, are seeking to have the documents unsealed.

Right to view reports argued

Charity Kenyon, an attorney representing the newspapers, argued that the public's right to view court documents was fundamental in an open legal system.

Other means exist for ensuring

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judge orders Laci Peterson autopsy report sealed

Judge orders Laci Peterson autopsy report sealed

The Modesto Bee

The Associated Press

Published: May 31, 2003, 06:49:17 AM PDT

MODESTO, Calif. (AP) - A judge ruled Friday that an autopsy report on the deaths of Laci Peterson and her unborn son should remain sealed along with other search warrant and arrest records.

Superior Court Judge Al Girolami said releasing the information could hamper the murder investigation and prejudice public opinion before a trial begins.

Girolami is scheduled to hear more arguments June 6 from prosecutors preparing a murder case against Peterson's husband, Scott Peterson. Prosecutors on Thursday asked that the autopsy reports be released to the public. They argued that media leaks of the reports are biased toward the defense.

Girolami also ordered that leaks of sealed information stop and indicated he would consider a gag order to stop the prosecution and defense teams from talking to the media.

Scott Peterson, 30, is accused of killing his wife and unborn son, whom the couple had planned to name Conner, last December in their home. Laci, 27, was eight months pregnant at the time. The bodies washed ashore in San Francisco Bay last month.

Contra Costa County authorities concluded their autopsy report earlier this month, but did not disclose the cause of death.

Several media outlets have released details of the coroner's report, and a spokeswoman for Laci Peterson's family members said Thursday they were "devastated" at hearing autopsy reports without warning on television.

The leaked reports indicated the unborn son had plastic tape wrapped around his neck and a significant cut across the shoulders.

Meanwhile, friends of Laci Peterson removed several personal articles Friday from the single-story Modesto home where she and Scott Peterson lived.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

MOM'S MOVING MOMENT

MOM'S MOVING MOMENT

By HOWARD BREUER and MARSHA KRANES

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 31, 2003 -- Laci Peterson's mother - shattered by the graphic details leaked from the 25-page autopsy of her unborn grandson - yesterday began removing her slain daughter's belongings from the home she had shared with her accused murderer husband, Scott.

Sharon Rocha, accompanied by several friends and relatives, was seen at the Modesto, Calif., house removing the rocking chair Laci had bought to use when she nursed her infant son, as well as unopened Christmas gifts, clothing, chairs, lamps and artwork.

In doing so, she ignored the advice of her lawyer, Al Clark, that she wait until he, Scott Peterson's lawyers and court officials work out the procedures to be followed when she entered the house.

Modesto police arrived while Rocha was there, and she and her entourage left a short time later after packing seven cars full of Laci's belongings.

Hours later, lawyers representing Laci's family and Scott Peterson started haggling over whether removing the items was legal.

Scott Peterson's mother, Jackie, expressed outrage that the items had been removed since Laci's family had "absolutely no permission to be in that house."

Scott Peterson has pleaded not guilty to killing his wife and their unborn son.

Laci's family said Wednesday that they had hired lawyers to help them retrieve a baby crib and jewelry from the home.

Meanwhile, Clark told Fox News his client's anger over the grisly revelations leaked from her daughter's and grandson's sealed autopsy reports drove her to go get her daughter's possessions.

A family spokeswoman said Rocha was "devastated" by the reports describing how the near full-term fetus of her grandson Conner had plastic tape wrapped around the neck and a large cut across the chest when he was found in the shallow waters of San Francisco Bay last month.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 881-894 next last
To: Chad Fairbanks
For the record, I don't like the concept of trial by media either. If you noticed, on this thread, I'm mostly expressing opinions (and that's all that they are) about the behavior of the lawyers and the family. I'm leaning towards the "he's guilty" side, but we haven't seen much actual evidence (just spin). I have no idea what the State's case will look like.

But Geragos' tactics are kind of slimy, from the "declaration of war" against the grieving parents, all the way to the leaks. And I have to say, the satanic cult defense just really sounds hokey--almost as hokey as "we know who did it and we will prove it" sounds. If they already know, they should turn it over to the police--several attorneys have said that as officers of the court, it's their duty to turn it over to the police. They haven't, which makes it look pretty bogus. My opinion--Geragos and company are making Peterson look really, really guilty.

161 posted on 05/31/2003 10:51:01 AM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
I think if they wanted this stuff they did the only and right thing.
Are they going to spend $10,000 contesting maybe $2,000 in stuff in court.

This for them puts some stuff to rest. It was closure in part and they deserved that.
162 posted on 05/31/2003 10:51:43 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
I heard that most of the furniture taken (wicker chair set, stained glass lamp) was given to Laci from her grandmother. They also took unopened Christmas gifts, and stuff like diplomas, pictures. That's all they have left of Laci, so I can understand their desperation.
163 posted on 05/31/2003 10:53:02 AM PDT by arichtaxpayer (We will not tire. We will not falter. And we will not fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
His lawyers certainly don't appear to be helping. True enough... Still doesn't negate what the Rochas did though... We can't just give them a pass on this because they had their feelings hurt by leaked reports, and we can't just give them a pass because the Peterson Family is a pack of scumbags...

Well, maybe everyone else can, but I can't...
164 posted on 05/31/2003 10:53:44 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (A blind man received a cheese grater as a gift - said it was the most violent thing he had ever read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
You don't know lawyers, when you contest items in court, only the lawyers get the items.

Had one friend decades ago left with a $250,000 lawyer bill from his divorce and my own sister had a $60,000 bill over nothing, so if you are smart, you take what you want and later let the other side decide if they want to spend $20,000 trying to get back $500.
165 posted on 05/31/2003 10:55:30 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Are they going to spend $10,000 contesting maybe $2,000 in stuff in court.

This for them puts some stuff to rest. It was closure in part and they deserved that.

Oh, well, ok. You convinced me. SInce they did it for 'Closure', then let's give them a pass on their actions. After all, everyone knows that the most important thing in life is 'closure'...

If they really wanted 'closure', then $10,000 dollars in legal fees is chump change - can one put a price on 'closure'?

166 posted on 05/31/2003 10:56:01 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (A blind man received a cheese grater as a gift - said it was the most violent thing he had ever read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Oh, ok. Good advice. SInce laywers will screw us, let's break the law...

Ok, I'm in!!!!
167 posted on 05/31/2003 10:56:52 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (A blind man received a cheese grater as a gift - said it was the most violent thing he had ever read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
I hadn't heard that about the house--now if cleaning the house isn't changing a "crime scene," I don't know what is!
168 posted on 05/31/2003 10:57:26 AM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
I think this is a little bit too strong

" certainly can't abide thieves (The Rochas)... "

I understand what your saying, but as RG stated, the house is still currently 50/50 of Laci and Scott. Until Probate! And since that is the case, anything of Laci's values from Laci's parents would be, in my humble opinion, theirs, NOT scott's nor the Lee and Jackie peterson's show!

This is civil, and that is why the police were on 'stand-by'..... If criminal, they, Rocha's would of been arrested on the spot.

okay, bookmarking... have errands to take care of today...

Oh, scroll down to the power of attorney docs

Sailingacross

Might help ya some in this civil matter, not criminal matter.

169 posted on 05/31/2003 10:59:22 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Absolutly they get a pass. Why let the lawyers end up with her stuff?
Why go to court and pay $10,000 to get possessions valued at $1000. Let the other side spend $20,000 chasing the issue in court instead.

This issue is over. The expense of chasing this isn't worth it.
That is why it would have been prohibitive for Laci's family to act through the court. That would be INSANE cost wise!

Would you through away $25,000 in court or just go get your sister's belongings for your mother yourself as well? I would.
170 posted on 05/31/2003 10:59:42 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
"If the wife dies, it belongs to the husband 100 percent, including the right to determine who goes in there."

Are you speaking for your state, or the state of California? And if the latter, are you an attorney? I ask because some California attorneys on FNC insisted otherwise--that the house is not in fact owned by Scott until this case is decided one way or the other. If he is found guilty, they say, the house will go to Laci's heirs, probably her parents.

171 posted on 05/31/2003 10:59:50 AM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
The Petersons have been moving stuff out of the house, staying there, swimming in the pool.

Trashy.
172 posted on 05/31/2003 11:01:20 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Did they, or did they not go into a home (which did not belong to them) and remove truckloads of items (which did not belong to them)?

A simple yes or no will suffice. No need for, "Well yes, but they did it because...". A simple yes or no? If yes, then no matter what the reasoning or excuses, it was Theft. If they did not do that, then I am wrong....

173 posted on 05/31/2003 11:01:49 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (A blind man received a cheese grater as a gift - said it was the most violent thing he had ever read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I ask because some California attorneys on FNC insisted otherwise--that the house is not in fact owned by Scott until this case is decided one way or the other. If he is found guilty, they say, the house will go to Laci's heirs, probably her parents.

Exactly.

And the Rochas attorneys contend that because there is no death certificate, the Rochas have just as much right in that house as do the Petersons, regardless of their POA; Scott CANNOT benefit from a crime he committed.

174 posted on 05/31/2003 11:02:42 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: WellsFargo94
Not sure if you can see anything

these are most likely the last near her disappearance pics taken.

175 posted on 05/31/2003 11:02:59 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Aren't refies a matter of public record? They are in the state I live in.
176 posted on 05/31/2003 11:03:14 AM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Why go to court and pay $10,000 to get possessions valued at $1000. Let the other side spend $20,000 chasing the issue in court instead.

Cool! Cuz my sister-in-law has some really cool stuff that I'd like to have...

177 posted on 05/31/2003 11:03:16 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (A blind man received a cheese grater as a gift - said it was the most violent thing he had ever read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: fxrdeb
LOL... too funny....
178 posted on 05/31/2003 11:03:41 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
understand.... ;o)
179 posted on 05/31/2003 11:04:11 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Scott CANNOT benefit from a crime he committed

Sorry, Howlin, I have to call you on that - he hasn't been convicted yet. Once he's convicted, then you are correct. Until then, it's still his home...

180 posted on 05/31/2003 11:04:41 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (A blind man received a cheese grater as a gift - said it was the most violent thing he had ever read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 881-894 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson