Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Galtoid
I suspect your explanation is valid. I'm wondering if the delay wasn't time to win over a few more Iraqui military leaders.

The problem with that is, if they no longer existed, it negated the reason given to be there in the first place. And, the next thing, liberating the Iraquis...well, I doubt letting a Shiite majority vote for their government was on the screen.

This incursion and the one in Afghanistan will be up to history to judge. But, it'll be hard. You can't evaluate what didn't happen. I suspect that disrupting the flow of things in these Mideast hotbeds stopped at least some terrorist acts.

Meanwhile, something has to be done to stabilize the region. I'm glad GWB is now bringing up the Palestinian issue and insisting the Israelis come along for the ride.

27 posted on 05/31/2003 8:29:41 AM PDT by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: grania
The problem with that is, if they no longer existed, it negated the reason given to be there in the first place.

So you are buying into the Leftists argument that finding the WMD was the only reason to be there?

29 posted on 05/31/2003 9:17:50 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and his Weapons of Mass Destruction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson