Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks
Who's changed the subject? I see you got away from that subject pretty quickly yourself when I pointed out that several other studies have consistently shown a higher correlation of sexual orientation among identical twins than among fraternal twins, thus shattering your risible argument.
74 posted on 06/02/2003 5:47:56 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams
I pointed out that several other studies have consistently shown a higher correlation of sexual orientation among identical twins than among fraternal twins, thus shattering your risible argument.

How??? I can show you studies that have a 60% concordance rate. It DOESN"T mean they are right or wrong, only that they were accurate for that sample that day.

What ALL our studies don't have is an ability to be replicated over and over. If you can't answer why that is you have NO credibility to impose your study over any other period.

79 posted on 06/02/2003 5:58:45 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
I pointed out that several other studies have consistently shown a higher correlation of sexual orientation among identical twins

Another lie! You only mentioned the one done by the ASU science building that has no name. But now I'm curious, do these "several other studies" have names either or do we just refer to them as the "several other studies" studies.

82 posted on 06/02/2003 6:06:42 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
My other point is, if Racicot really cared about the attack of the homosexual left on the religious right then he would have argued our point when meeting with them. He would have said, "You need to understand that many in the GOP feel that your organizations are violating their rights to raise their children as they see fit, etc..." But nothing. He ONLY took on their rhetoric. He had no trouble confronting the Christian conservatives he met with. Why us and not them if you are trying to sell us on the concept that he is neutral (and I do not think we should be neutral on morality -- if the only thing the gov't did was take care of national defense then we could narrow that morality focus down, but they put themselves in the business of raising children and the like then morality is a big, important issue).
298 posted on 06/08/2003 9:01:51 AM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson