[FreedomCalls]

No, I'm not suggesting it and I can't fathom how you could imagine I did.

By suggesting that simply because it "pulls huge ratings" and "means more SSS for stockholders" that anything goes. I provided an example of something that would pull even more ratings and would mean even MORE $$$ for stockholders -- so by extension you should be for it.

My point is that there is a point where the search for greater ratings crosses the line. I think the Laci wall-to-wall coverage has gone too far past that line.

[BunnySlippers]

This is not like hard core porn. If it was we'd have masses of people complaining. But the masses of people aren't complaining, they are watching!

Fox excels in tabloid TV ... do you rail against Fox all the time? And were you like this during the OJ trial?