1 posted on
05/28/2003 10:59:58 AM PDT by
IR8-1
To: IR8-1
The report I heard on FNC is that Ritter will be on and will disclose that SH TRIED to bribe him...I don't think this is new stuff..I believe there was a report some time ago that SH offered Ritter some gold jewelry for his wife.
To: IR8-1
It said Ritter to "come clean" on the Factor tonight.He's going to confess to being a "child molester"??
3 posted on
05/28/2003 11:03:30 AM PDT by
Mister Baredog
((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
To: IR8-1
I really wish they'd quit giving Ritter a platform. The man is a lower life form capable of selling out his own nation and seeking the company of underage girls. Enough already!
To: IR8-1
Why does everyone think money is the only way to bribe someone? A few hours in the children's prison alone with some of them would have been Scotty's idea of heaven and worth way more than gold to him.
8 posted on
05/28/2003 11:06:55 AM PDT by
techcor
(Admin Moderator wannabe)
To: doug from upland
ping
18 posted on
05/28/2003 11:22:30 AM PDT by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: IR8-1
Scott Ritter now belongs to the same fraternity as Ramsey Clark and Noam Chomsky.
To: IR8-1
Sounds like he might be worried that a couple of documents might show up. Setting the stage for
plausible deniability. Remember the Brit and the $10,000,000!
To: IR8-1
Fox has fallen into the habit of throwing too many teasers.
29 posted on
05/28/2003 12:30:32 PM PDT by
latrans
To: IR8-1
I would be remiss without including the great work of Registered on this thread.
![](http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/picturejokes/8424.jpg)
31 posted on
05/28/2003 1:34:19 PM PDT by
amused
(Republicans for Sharpton!)
To: IR8-1
On Hannity now.
32 posted on
05/28/2003 1:39:12 PM PDT by
b4its2late
(Blessed are those who hunger and thirst, for they are sticking to their diets.)
To: IR8-1
I watched it, he is such an idiot. He said we lost the war.
To: IR8-1
Something to ponder and speculate about:
What might Ritter and Hatfill have in common, or what common purpose might they both be said to serve?
Both are from similar communities, with similar professional paths (didn't make it as career military but stayed with international-security work through nontraditional means; also, both are connected with the UN Iraq inspector community; could be they know a lot of the same people).
Both are reported as having checkered pasts (and even presents) which have tended to discredit them though not to completely shut them down.
Both keep popping back up in the public eye with an interesting timing, after one has almost forgotten about them, and getting another 15 minutes of fame.
For whatever reason, the message of each, stated by one, implied by the other, is the same - Iraq (i.e. Saddam Hussein) is no anthrax threat.
43 posted on
05/28/2003 9:59:09 PM PDT by
pttttt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson