Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All; Wednesday's Child
He said that although bodies decompose in water, it is highly unlikely so many parts would be missing.

I was thinking about that when on our news here last night it was reported that a body had washed up. They said it was the duck hunter who went missing in December 2002. They were able to identify the body by the tatoo.

So I was thinking how did he have so much flesh left on him when apparently Laci was almost completely skeleton. Then I realized the difference was she was under the water all those months and he would have been floating.

I still think it is possible if she was weighted down in all those areas (which would be over kill) when that big storm came up the wave action could have broke her loose from the weights in her weakest areas.

He seems to be of the opinion that the body was dismembered before disposal...........as in the killer dismembering the body. He also said killers still try to dismember key body parts to try to hide anything that would aid in identification of the body.

That is so true. We had a murder here where they cut off the hands of the man and then threw him in the river. They figured without the hands they couldn't get prints and ID him.

They were so wrong. He was ID and they were caught.

117 posted on 05/27/2003 9:50:40 AM PDT by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Spunky
I will concede that due to weights, limbs might seperate from a body. But, to be missing three important parts (the head, hands, and whichever leg had the tattoo) can't be a coincidence.
123 posted on 05/27/2003 9:57:12 AM PDT by Wednesday's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson