Skip to comments.
The museum sacking that wasn't
Townhall.com ^
| May 27, 2003
| Rich Lowry
Posted on 05/27/2003 4:51:54 AM PDT by Cincinatus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Yet another left-wing canard hurled at our war effort, exposed for the codswallop it is. I only note in passing that this lie was swallowed -- hook, line, and sinker -- by several FReepers, who shall remain unnamed by me but know who they are.
To: Cincinatus
I didn't buy it from the beginning. How big a loss is a Pez Dispenser Collection and some Elvis on Black Velvet paitings to the world anyway?
2
posted on
05/27/2003 5:08:42 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(If you're looking for a friend, get a dog.)
To: Cincinatus
Yet another left-wing canard hurled at our war effort, exposed for the codswallop it is. I only note in passing that this lie was swallowed -- hook, line, and sinker -- by several FReepers, who shall remain unnamed by me but know who they are.Oh well, cheer up. You can name the codswallop-ingesting Freakers on another site.
3
posted on
05/27/2003 5:09:17 AM PDT
by
xJones
(Aiding the superior people is so tiresome)
To: Cincinatus
Another example of Jayson Blair type reporting?????
4
posted on
05/27/2003 5:09:32 AM PDT
by
duckman
To: Cincinatus
I remember seeing Christianne Ammanpour rant & rave about the looting. But coming from CNN, the Disseminator of lies, Hider of facts, what can else can we expect?
5
posted on
05/27/2003 5:22:20 AM PDT
by
Molly Pitcher
(Is Reality Optional?)
To: duckman
Tragedy of the Commons.
To: xJones
7
posted on
05/27/2003 5:38:07 AM PDT
by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
To: Cincinatus; Grampa Dave; FairOpinion; Howlin; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Best name for it I've seen yet--the Great Museum Heist that Wasn't! Yes, a number of Freepers bought it, and you just really have to ask why. In one breath many of these people will swear up and down that the media can't be trusted, and in the next, they swallow every word the media says or writes, "hook line and sinker" as you say, Cincinatus.
8
posted on
05/27/2003 5:43:23 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: MizSterious
What a wonderful and refreshing point of view this guy has! I would love to get some of this stuff that is stored in museums.
9
posted on
05/27/2003 5:49:50 AM PDT
by
abner
To: Cincinatus; Theresa; Physicist; Fifth Business; Torie; wideminded
"Items that are in private hands are much more secure than what's in the basement of the museum," says Deutsch.I know many Archeologists who would disagree vehemently.
licensed antiquities dealer
Go figure.
From post #1: I only note in passing that this lie was swallowed -- hook, line, and sinker -- by several FReepers, who shall remain unnamed by me but know who they are.
I see you are trying your best to make other freepers look and/or feel bad. I wonder why you would do this?
To: abner
What a wonderful and refreshing point of view this guy has! I would love to get some of this stuff that is stored in museums.You noticed that too!
To: MizSterious
Yes, a number of Freepers bought it, and you just really have to ask why. I personally know someone who was working on his PhD in this very area. He was appalled at the looting.
To: Cincinatus
Looking quickly through your link I only found one FReeper who didn't accept the story--AnAmericanMother. Everyone else was saying "who cares about some dusty old trash", except one or two who thought it was a loss to the world.
I saw no reason to doubt the facts of the reports--they were being reported by everyone. I don't see much reason for doubting them now on the basis of this one opinion piece.
13
posted on
05/27/2003 6:08:37 AM PDT
by
Seti 1
To: RadioAstronomer
Do you mean at the looting that wasn't? Even when the facts are known, why do people continue to repeat the lies?
14
posted on
05/27/2003 6:09:25 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: Seti 1
15
posted on
05/27/2003 6:15:54 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: RadioAstronomer
Looting is horrific. Something just as bad is that most things in museums languish in storage forever where no one can enjoy them.
16
posted on
05/27/2003 6:16:00 AM PDT
by
abner
To: Molly Pitcher
I remember seeing Did you just admit to watching Commie News Network?
17
posted on
05/27/2003 6:17:21 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
("Those who know, don't talk. Those who talk, don't know." (I'm in the 2nd group.))
To: MizSterious
these people will swear up and down that the media can't be trusted,Why is it you find unimpeachable a newspaper piece based on the opinions of an antiquities dealer and a gallery owner?
18
posted on
05/27/2003 6:19:57 AM PDT
by
Seti 1
To: MizSterious
None of this is to deny the terrible damage that did occur, the priceless bits of Iraq's heritage that have been stolen or destroyed -- or the many thousands more works that might be confirmed missing when curators finally go through the storehouses.The quote is from your WSJ link. Did you read it?
19
posted on
05/27/2003 6:24:19 AM PDT
by
Seti 1
To: Seti 1
Check my links above. I believe him because there is lots of evidence to back him up. (Unlike the NYT and CNN reports.) I've read a number of articles that contradicted those early reports of 170,000 artifacts being stolen. But it appears that some people see only what they want to see: if they happen to believe the US and the military are the "bad guys," should not have been there anyway, are incapable of planning, etc.--they'll ignore all reports to the contrary, even those backed up with facts.
20
posted on
05/27/2003 6:24:24 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson