1 posted on
05/24/2003 7:42:17 AM PDT by
veronica
To: veronica
~snort...LOL...you owe me a new keyboard...I blew coffee out my nose this was so funny.
2 posted on
05/24/2003 7:44:13 AM PDT by
Drango
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those that understand binaries, and those that don't.)
To: veronica
Thanks for more good news today about the NY Slimes!
3 posted on
05/24/2003 7:55:46 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Time to visit this website and join up: http://www.georgewbush.com/)
To: veronica
If it's libel shouldn't they be liable even if they're liberal?
4 posted on
05/24/2003 7:57:07 AM PDT by
Consort
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
5 posted on
05/24/2003 7:57:53 AM PDT by
Timesink
To: Liz; Timesink; Miss Marple; BOBTHENAILER; MeeknMing
Ooops, apparently this lie ended up in court, and the Slimes just got hammered.
6 posted on
05/24/2003 7:58:44 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Time to visit this website and join up: http://www.georgewbush.com/)
To: veronica
My,my! It never rains but it pours!! It seems that the NYT has suddenly become that Andy Capp character Joe Btfsplk (sp)(the unlucky little guy who always had a rain cloud over his head).
To: veronica
Aren't cub reporters taught in Elementary Reporting 101 that if someone's enemy accuses them of doing something wrong, that they should crosscheck it before assuming that the accusation is is true?
Maybe this isn't premeditated libel, but isn't it sloppy, reckless, unprofessional libel?
13 posted on
05/24/2003 8:31:49 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: veronica
But the jury said it was done without malicious intent and refused to award damages.
I was under the impression that Sulivan V NY Times stayed that there had to be malice shown for there to be libel in regards to a "public person".
18 posted on
05/24/2003 9:54:49 AM PDT by
Valin
(Age and deceit beat youth and skill)
To: veronica
A pyrrhic victory, but I'll take it.
20 posted on
05/24/2003 10:49:48 AM PDT by
martin_fierro
(A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
To: veronica
Fox Butterfield The biggest gun grabber at the paper. Figures.
21 posted on
05/24/2003 10:52:03 AM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("It's the same ole story, same ole song and dance, my friend")
To: veronica
"HA HA" (c)Nelson
26 posted on
05/24/2003 4:03:36 PM PDT by
ChadGore
(Frustrate one liberal a day, that's all we ask.)
To: veronica
Advice to the NYT - when you are in the hole, stop digging. Anyone should know not to trust a reporter named Jayson or Fox Butterfield.
28 posted on
05/24/2003 5:24:24 PM PDT by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
To: veronica
This just in:
THE NEW YORK TIMES has found a replacement that is guaranteed to bring them to an
EVEN HIGHER LEVEL OF EXCELLENCE than they were known for, before all this trouble occurred:
"YES SIR MR RAINES, I'LL GET RIGHT ON IT!!!"
31 posted on
05/24/2003 6:53:07 PM PDT by
Vetnet
("WHO'S NEXT?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson