Skip to comments.
Iran Officials Admit to Holding Al Qaeda Operatives
CNN ^
| May 23, 2003 0227 GMT
| Kelli Arena
Posted on 05/22/2003 8:00:20 PM PDT by ewing
Iranian officials said Thursday that Iran has several unnamed Al Qaeda operatives in custody, The Cable News Network has learned.
The acknowledgement came as Washington has intensified its accusations that Al Qaeda terrorists are inside Iran-something Terhan had previously denied.
United States officials say the key area in question is whether the Al Qaeda operatives in custody are allowed to communicate and recieve visitors.
One Bush Administration official told CNN that Landar Brahimi , the United Nations Special Representative for Afghanistan met Thursday in Geneva with Iranian officials.
It was during that meeting that Iran said it had several Al Qaeda representatives in custody.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 200305; 20030522; againstus; alqaeda; alqaedairan; cnn; iran; qaedainiran; seifaladel; southasia; southasialist; us; withus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: Dog Gone
A covert snatch would be fineAnd a covert "hit" is easier to pull off. Though admittedly the potential intelligence gained by taking them (especially the big fish) alive is quite tempting.
41
posted on
05/28/2003 6:22:08 AM PDT
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: Coop
"Iran is still making noises about releasing these folks to "friendly" (not the Great Satan!) countries."
Well, according to a Sydney Morning Herald story they want to turn the folks over to Saudi Arabia in return for the MEK leadership. Now I'm all for getting rid of the MEK, but they blew the whistle on the Iranian nuclear program and the ayatollahs don't deserve any prizes here.
"But the Iranian Foreign Minister, who the other day said there were no senior AQ officials in Iran, is now saying "Well, we have no way of knowing who these folks are and whether or not they're senior." I expect that within a few days Iran will suddenly have found a way to identify a few names, and I pray (not holding breath here) one of them is a big fish."
I think al-Adel or Zarqawi are probably the biggest fishes at this point. However, I would be extremely apprehensive about letting the ayatollahs turn even these folks over to Saudi Arabia because of the Kingdom's policy of giving al-Qaeda operatives the revolving door jail treatment. One of the reasons Iran was so willing to "deport" them in the past is due to their assurances by the Saudis that they would be released in the near future.
"As you say, once the names of those held eventually come out they may only be token sacrifices to appease the U.S. We'll see. But I think Iran is feeling the pressure. I don't think Iran has changed its actions, so much as the U.S. is now turning its attention east from Iraq to Iran."
We'll just have to wait and see. Like you said, it depends on who they cough up and who's still left.
To: Cindy; the Real fifi; swarthyguy
Links at 6 and 8 bump.
43
posted on
04/15/2004 5:23:46 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: Shermy
Thanks, Shermy. Wonder how open the IranIraq border is today.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson