[ethical]

The original point, which was not my own but I agreed with it, had to do with the absurd notion that anyone would give any kind of credibility at all to a sexual relationship that is so biologically wrong that if everyone engaged in it it would mean the end of the human race. It would be akin to giving credibility to a group of people who had a strong desire to eat by shoving food into their ears instead of their mouths even though they would end up starving to death.

[ShadowDancer]

But it is a factually baseless reason for not making it legal. Is it factually accurate that if everyone in the world practiced homosexuality that the world would cease to exist as far as being populated by humans? Yes. Is it even remotely sane to try to use that as a basis for why homosexuality should not be legalized? No. That is so far-fetched it doesn't even merit mentioning.