Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John O
Regardless of what the laws stated at that time, the OATH that REL swore to was to the states (plural) not to the nation.

That's no help. Eleven states wrote secession documents. Twenty Two remained loyal. On what basis could Lee fight for the minority, or figure he had a fig leaf to cover the idea that he was fighting "any opposers whatsover" of the United States?

Walt

265 posted on 05/13/2003 12:32:35 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Be copy now to men of grosser blood and teach them how to war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
Eleven states wrote secession documents. Twenty Two remained loyal. On what basis could Lee fight for the minority

He was fighting for his state. He swore an oath to the collective states and when his state was no longer part of the collective his oath had no more power.

Picture if our soldiers swear an oath to the UN for whatevere purpose and we leave the UN. Are our soldiers supposed to fight against us if the UN says so? I don't think so.

331 posted on 05/14/2003 9:04:45 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson