Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yonif
If the CSA would have won, don't you think they would have tried to take over the North?

No, they weren't interested in controlling the north, or forcing their culture on the north; they only wanted the sovereignty to govern themselves as free states. They weren't pro-slavery per se, they were pro-choice. Their position could be paraphrased "If you don't like slavery, don't own any slaves; just don't try to force your anti-slavery views on everyone else." Obviously, that's a ridiculous over-simplification, just as those who claim the civil war was fought over slavery choose to ignore the more central issue of states' rights/sovereignty that led to the secession of the CSA.

202 posted on 05/13/2003 8:49:06 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]


To: VRWCmember
I recall reading somewhere that after Lincoln's Emancipation Prolamation, there were still slaves in the North. Is this true?
213 posted on 05/13/2003 9:25:08 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson