[Ichneumon]

You are blathering again.

Readers are capable of making up their own minds on that matter, trying to lead them won't change it.

Breadboard it, evidently it has not been done.

Answer the question first; I want to make sure it's not a waste of my time. You'll find the highly relevant question in the part you tried to write off as "blathering".

[AndrewC]

Answer the question first; I want to make sure it's not a waste of my time

That is what I asked with my initial post. All of this since then has been to get you to produce real evidence to back up your assertions. But remember the circuit must operate at 1Ghz and 2 volts as stipulated in the patent. And use diodes for the patented circuit. If the evolved circuit is the one SciAm, you are going to need the schematic. The SciAm circuit does not indicate which transistors are NPN or PNP. It also seems to be missing the 2V connection for the voltage to current input source.

The other stipulation is that the patented circuit as modeled in the SciAm article has a very important resistor. It is the resistor that provides a "reference" current into the patented circuit(I_out = I_in³ / I_c² It provides the I_c). We don't want to select it so as to handicap the patented circuit.

[null and void]

Interesting that these threads usually die out early. But here, where there is actual proof that an evolutionary process works, It's deny reality city.

If the facts do not fit the theory theology, they must be disposed of...

[Lurking Libertarian]

Blather-resistant placemarker.