West Coast Tremors (CA Gov. Grey Davis Recall Effort Gaining Steam)

National Journal and LA Times ^ | May 6, 2003 | Chuck Todd

[ewing]

Aides to House Rep. Darrell Issa (R-49) who himself aspires to be Governor, plan to file papers as early as today to creating yet another campaign to recall Governor Grey Davis.

Aides said that Issa plans to provide six figure donations as seed monies for the new recall effort called Rescue California.

Sacramento political consultant Dave Gilliard who will manage the new effort and represents Issa as well as half a dozen GOP'ers said: 'This funding is substantial and more than enough to do the job that needs to be done.'

Gilliard said the committee will have sufficient money to hire professional petition circulators who will attempt to gather 700,000 to 800,000 signatures of registered voters.

Such fims generally charge $1-$2.00 per name. Other committees already in operation are expected to gather the balance of the roughly 1.2 million signatures needed to put a recall measure before voters.

[bonesmccoy]

It is remarkable to see how the Calif. GOP appears to flap like a trout out of the brook.

Now, the waters are rising, and the fish is still flapping.

Even with all this recall work, the party leadership is still appearing to be on the fence.

What is the question?

Why are they so lame?

[cgk]

When did the dosage shortages occur? Just curious, because there is no shortage at UCLA, where my baby goes.

As for the vaccinations made from aborted babies - this is where I read it: Vaccine Brochure Sample

and here: The 293 and PER C6 Cell Lines Using AD5., which lists patent numbers on these vaccination formulas as well as FDA reports and links confirming this information.

Here's just one sample of the many FDA references to the use of aborted babies in vaccine creation: FDA Report, please refer to page 81, lines 14-22, where this is stated:

(snip...) "So the Kidney material, the fetal kidney material was as follows. The kidney of the fetus was, with an unknown family history, was obtained in 1972 probably. The precise date is not known anymore. The fetus, as far as I can remember was completely normal. Nothing was wrong. The reasons for the abortion were unknown to me. I probably knew it at the time, but it got lost, all this information."

[bonesmccoy]

the FDA report which you linked was fun to read. The science is familar and the nomenclature standard.

Basically, the scientist admits that he is using cells from a fetal kidney. The cells were being exposed to a virus in the attempt to establish a cell line which could be grown in a culture medium.

Without a human cell culture line, it is not possible to grown virus that infects human cells.

I see little recourse than to use fetal tissue samples.

The point is that he does not know the origin of the renal tissue (voluntary abortion or post-mortem analysis).