Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
I don't really know anything about genetics, DNA, etc., so someone correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it true that scientists can only trace the mitochondrial DNA of these ancient remains, i.e., the DNA that comes down from females in the family line? Therefore, isn't it true that if the remains are those of a male, his mitochondrial DNA (the hardiest DNA) would not have been passed down. Only the female's mitochondrial DNA would have survived. So we'll never be able to establish a familial link to a male mummy, right? Or wrong?
25 posted on 05/05/2003 7:15:33 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker
True, in a sense. Mitochondria come from the egg, and they have their own DNA, all the mito that you and any of your sibling have came from your mother. And unless a mutation has occurred in you or your siblings, it is the same. But still, a match would mean he was a cousin or an uncle, that sort of thing.
26 posted on 05/05/2003 7:29:12 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson