Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Happened to the NAACP Boycott of South Carolina?

Posted on 05/04/2003 10:34:29 AM PDT by Tacis

Some time ago, the NAACP declared a boycott against the state of South Carolina, as I recall, because of the continued inclusion of some Confederate symbology in the state flag.

Is that boycott still in effect, and, if not, when/why did the NAACP end it?

If that boycott is still in effect, has the NAACP made any recent statements regarding the democrat debate, last night, in South Carolina? If the democrats have violated an established NAACP boycott and all nine candidates "crossed the line," doesn't this simply let us more about democrat hypocracy and their views regarding blacks in this country?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: boycott; debate; democrat; naacp; southcarolina
Has any of the old time, ultra-left wing media mentioned the NAACP boycott of South Carolina and the dems' disregard of NAACP issues?
1 posted on 05/04/2003 10:34:29 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tacis
The NAACP Boycott continues. However it wasn't about Confederate symbology in their State flag, it was about a Confederate battle flag flying on the Statehouse dome.

After dueling protests, a "compromise" was reached. The flag would come down off of the Statehouse dome and go to a more appropriate location at the Confederate memorial on the Statehouse grounds. This way the flag would be in its historical context and could not be confused with being a protest of Civil Rights.

This compromise was backed by tons and tons of South Carolina businessmen who were afraid of the boycott.

BUT.....immediately after the compromise was enacted the NAACP stabbed their businessmen backers in the back. It was more important to them to keep the divisive issue than it was to maintain the compromise. This backstabbing alienated nearly every businessman in the State of South Carolina who had helped them with the compromise. They are unlikely to make that mistake again.

Having been stabbed in the back, the State of South Carolina has pretty well shrugged off the NAACP and currently nobody seems much interested in assisting them remove the flag from the Confederate Memorial.

So the Boycott continues but it is pretty much ineffective. Its only use is to make Democratic Presidential candidates sweat and hurt black South Carolinian businessmen who used to make a lot of money from the Black Homecoming/Reunion that occurred there.
2 posted on 05/04/2003 10:44:21 AM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Selective indignation and blindness....

NAACP will still exhort its members to vote the straight Democrat ticket in any upcoming election. The most "yellow dog" Democrats of all.
3 posted on 05/04/2003 10:45:02 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
The issue probably died quietly due to lack of interest.
4 posted on 05/04/2003 10:49:30 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
I wonder why Mississippi doesn't have the same problem, considering the confederate flag is embedded in their state flag.

Just wondering...
5 posted on 05/04/2003 10:49:59 AM PDT by pianomikey (piano for prez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
To clarify, the NAACP has issued several statements before the debate in regards to the debate and campaigning, but only in regards to the democratic canidates. (Since several canidates contacted the NAACP to give there opinion and get there "blessing"). The NAACP stated, that it understands the issue of the debate is necessary, and that it is important for african americans to have a debate with as many canidates as possible, and it would allow an exception and hold no grudge to the democrats, since they are important to them. I.E. since its the democrats kissing the ring, they'll make an exception, but if it was republicans, they would flip, also on another note, they made it clear that democratic canidates can and should also feel free to campaign in the state without any fear of reprisal.
6 posted on 05/04/2003 10:56:10 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
What ever happened to the Southern Baptist boycott of Disney?
7 posted on 05/04/2003 10:57:33 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Arkinsaw says "BUT.....immediately after the compromise was enacted the NAACP stabbed their businessmen backers in the back."

Yes, also many black state legislators felt stabbed in the back because they went to bat for the NAACP, and after the NAACP did a 180 they felt foolish.

8 posted on 05/04/2003 11:03:11 AM PDT by Reagan79 (Update at Asbury Seminary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pianomikey
Because we called their bluff and said "Bring It On" we don't want your a$$e$ in Mississippi anyway so do us a favor and PLEEEEEAE boycott us. We exposed their huff and bluff for what it was....alot of hot air.
9 posted on 05/04/2003 11:08:19 AM PDT by sandmanbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sandmanbr
"The buzz is, a cable network plans to re-run the series “Roots” backward so that all the slaves will end up back in Africa ... to give it a happy ending --- or a happy beginning – whichever it turns out to be."

Link (( firehat )) ... 'article' --- is there !

10 posted on 05/04/2003 11:13:10 AM PDT by f.Christian (( With Rights ... comes Responsibilities --- irresponsibility --- whacks // criminals - psychos ! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I know a lot of Southern Baptists, and also Assembly of God. None of them have gone to Disney in years. I don't know how much has to do with an official boycott, it's just than Disney has a bad name among Christians.

In my bulletin a few weeks ago there was a big article how Disney is not having Christian services there anymore because there it was "exclusive". I had known this from FR already, but it can't be doing Disney any good to have this published in Christian bulletins. And it wasn't a traditional fundamentalist church either.
11 posted on 05/04/2003 11:18:31 AM PDT by I still care (America is great because it is good. When it ceases to be good, it will cease to be great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
The boycott rages on...... but they practiced a little symbolism by staying away from the hotels/resturants......


12 posted on 05/04/2003 11:25:53 AM PDT by deport (Beware of Idiots bearing gifts.... One maybe the FR Joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
They are still putting their little banners up at the state line saw one last Saturday on US 17 rest stop.
13 posted on 05/04/2003 11:38:24 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
"What ever happened to the Southern Baptist boycott of Disney? "

I'm not a Southern Baptist, but I still boycott Disney.

14 posted on 05/04/2003 12:25:58 PM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
NAACP Lexicon entry: Compromise-cave in to our demands, and give us everything we want. see capitulate
15 posted on 05/04/2003 12:38:56 PM PDT by StDonTheBaptist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Kwiesi Mfume and the NAACP are ineffective because of the corrupt leadership and the organization's own despicable practices. Anything RATS do is acceptable and anything PUBS is wrong regardless of one-sided point of view. This was clearly shown when in 2001 Senator Bobby Byrd called blacks "niggers" on nationwide tv but NAACP refuses to call for his resignation as a RAT leader and as a senator. Yet, the NAACP PERCEIVED and ASSUMED, not based on reality, an insult on Trent Lott's words at a retirement party for Strom Thurmond a few months ago. Regardless, the hue and cry required Lott to step down from his leadership role. This is so one-sided, and I'm not a Lott a fan. But I do have to point out the unequal, biased, corrupt organization's role in the affair. I'm NOT sympathetic to this racist organization.
16 posted on 05/04/2003 1:19:55 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
If the democrats have violated an established NAACP boycott and all nine candidates "crossed the line," doesn't this simply let us more about democrat hypocracy and their views regarding blacks in this country?

The NAACP has said that he boycott does not apply to democrats. The NAACP has granted democrats a "waiver" during the election season.

17 posted on 05/04/2003 1:48:57 PM PDT by aomagrat (IYAOYAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson